Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

Megan Fox, all is forgiven!

That English chick can't even act. Why did Bay hire her? She is not even remotely attractive and way too tall for Sam. Is Bay porking her or something? It is more than evident the reason for selecting her as the lead female was not based on logic or her acting prowess.

Transformers-UK03.jpg

We know they've seen each other naked...

Since

Megatron

is now dead, do you think you think we'll see

Galvatron

in the next movie?

Personally, I would love to see the DinoBots and RodimusPrime in the next installment... you know there's going to be one despite Bay's claims.

Bay is done, someone will carry it on but it won't be Bay

^ Some great things in his blog posts...things I never even thought of... but, the one which is plaguing me at the moment is.... If Sentinal Prime is the only person able to open the Space bridge...how does Jetfire open a Space bridge to egypt in ROTF?

Do i need to have watched second film before watching the third one?

Ive seen the first but couldnt sit through second, i want to watch a 3d film but only film showing at my local Vue is the third film.

Nope, no need.

^ Some great things in his blog posts...things I never even thought of... but, the one which is plaguing me at the moment is.... If Sentinal Prime is the only person able to open the Space bridge...how does Jetfire open a Space bridge to egypt in ROTF?

Transformers films aren't meant to be thought about... you'll get a nose bleed if you think about them. Human minds can't make the logical gymnastics needed to comprehend a Michael Bay film.

^ Some great things in his blog posts...things I never even thought of... but, the one which is plaguing me at the moment is.... If Sentinal Prime is the only person able to open the Space bridge...how does Jetfire open a Space bridge to egypt in ROTF?

I think it's more of a mechanism to stop people from misusing it. More like if you have a code to a safe, only you can access it etc.

Finally saw it last night. Optimus is just bad ass. at the end.

Indeed, though, I think you should use spoiler tags, haha!

Watching Optimus **** up Sentinel and Megatron was amazing to watch, even with one arm, haha!

.

Indeed, though, I think you should use spoiler tags, haha!

Watching Optimus **** up Sentinel and Megatron was amazing to watch, even with one arm, haha!

.

I don't think it needs spoiler tags. lol He's been badass throughout all the 3 movies anyway. :laugh:

I don't think it needs spoiler tags. lol He's been badass throughout all the 3 movies anyway. :laugh:

Yeah, each movie has an outstanding Optimus scene, and it was the same in Dark of the new moon.

Still though I think the best scene in the trilogy was the forest scene in ROTF. EPIC!

Paramount?s Transformers: Dark of the Moon has transformed into the third best worldwide debut of all time, smashing records and grossing a whopping $372 million through Sunday.

With the actual July 4th holiday still to go, Michael Bay?s Dark of the Moon should finish Monday with a total opening gross of $405.8 million. That would not change its status compared to Half-Blood Prince and Spider-Man, since Monday's grosses don't count in terms of the record.

Domestically, Dark of the Moon?s gross through Sunday was $162 million. It?s expected to earn another $18.8 million Monday for a total domestic launch of $180.8 million.

Saw it tonight in 3d.

Only seen a few 3d films and this was by far the best.

i also think its probably the best of the trilogy.

i didn't pay atttention to the depth of the script of anything, but the NSA general lady with blonde hair annoyed the hell out of me.

if she was in charge of the autobots being on earth or w/e her role was, surely she would have known about Sam and what he has done and why he should be involved in everything, rather than try stopping him being involved. her attitude to it all was one thing that annoyed me in the movie

i would also have liked to have known

where the other tiny robot came from (not the one from T2) and also where the other new autobots came from. AND finally, what about the other decepticons that were all over the planet, i find it hard to believe that no more than approx 10 autobots survived and escaped cybertron but theres 100's of decepticons

Overall, for what it was, its clearly going to be my favourite movie.

Saw it tonight in 3d.

Only seen a few 3d films and this was by far the best.

i also think its probably the best of the trilogy.

i didn't pay atttention to the depth of the script of anything, but the NSA general lady with blonde hair annoyed the hell out of me.

if she was in charge of the autobots being on earth or w/e her role was, surely she would have known about Sam and what he has done and why he should be involved in everything, rather than try stopping him being involved. her attitude to it all was one thing that annoyed me in the movie

i would also have liked to have known

where the other tiny robot came from (not the one from T2) and also where the other new autobots came from. AND finally, what about the other decepticons that were all over the planet, i find it hard to believe that no more than approx 10 autobots survived and escaped cybertron but theres 100's of decepticons

Overall, for what it was, its clearly going to be my favourite movie.

I agree with you 100% so many people are going into this movie expecting something it's not trying to be.

It can still do well and not be good.

And who said it wasn't good? Some critics liked it. Some didn't. It's all a matter of taste. I thought it was the best of the three. It was damn good action and great effects.

Loved it. A bit sad that Bay might not be making more, he's really good at it. Knowing the studios they'll probably try and keep the franchise going to milk it, but I don't think it will be the same without Bay.

Well, if you think about it, what else can they do? They need to give the franchise a rest for a few years otherwise people will get tired of it. Look what happened to Star Trek (original and TNG). 8 years without a Trek movie until JJ Abrahams re-invented the franchise because the last Trek movie before JJs, Star Trek: Nemesis, was an epic failure.

I love the Transformers and personally, I could watch a movie every 2 years, but not everyone is like me so I think they should give the franchise a rest and come back in a few years and do another one. Maybe Michael Bay will return to the helm then because for now he said he had enough directing robots.

Maybe they should do a prequel on how the whole war at their planet began but then again that would be quite expensive since it would have to be all CGI and if memory serves, Michael Bay said on an interview that every robot movement cost thousands of dollars so I would imagine it would be quite expensive.

By the way, I really laughed when I heard the line: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" from you know who. That was too funny. Wasn't expecting that one!!!!...LOL

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!