Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

@RottenTomatoes: Roger Ebert gives Transformers 1 star. "One of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies." http://t.co/Kt3bi9D

:rofl:

the guy seems to hate everything :p...everytime I see his name mentioned its always because a review or controversy over a tweet

I thought she was Scottish. I didn't think they were one and the same.

She is Scottish.

The English, Welsh and Scottish are all technically British, regardless of if any might moan about being put under the label that has anything to do with being part of the UK but that is usually just some angry Scots, lol.

But isn't Irish not = Scottish. Don't they get twisted if someone confuses the two, I thought the same thing goes with British and Scottish.

What do you mean by twisted?

And ignoring the double negative, :p, Irish aren't Scottish, those from Northern Ireland iirc can be Irish and British because northern island is governed and part of the UK, just like the Scottish are Scottish and British, the same goes for the rest.

The point being, lol, Karen Gillan is Scottish, but that doesn't mean she isn't British, the same would go for anyone from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

@RottenTomatoes: Roger Ebert gives Transformers 1 star. "One of the more unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies." http://t.co/Kt3bi9D

:rofl:

He's a ****ing dip****, I hate him and his reviews :angry: Going to see it Thursday with my girl and not expecting a A+ storyline because that's not what Transformers is about in my opinion, it's all about the fighting :woot: We were going to see it in IMAX but our IMAX decided Cars 2 was a better movie to show :blink: From all of the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes I think people are going in to this movie expecting Schindler's List or something..... This movie is supposed to be dark, gritty and high octane action which I am sure this delivers in every way and I am sure the majority of the people who see it are expecting the same thing I am. Movie critics are just that, I would love for them to make a movie so we can all cut them down and call there stuff ****! :laugh:

Yeah, the 3D was so worth it. Saw it last night, and it was incredible. Only the second time I've ever enjoyed 3D, and I feel like it really added to the experience. It made Michael Bay really slow down his cuts so we could understand and take in what was going on more. See it in 3D for sure.

P.S - Avatar wasn't the other 3D film I enjoyed, it was Tron: Legacy. It's all about value added, not just random 3D... Avatar just felt like 3D for the sake of 3D.

Yeah, the 3D was so worth it. Saw it last night, and it was incredible. Only the second time I've ever enjoyed 3D, and I feel like it really added to the experience. It made Michael Bay really slow down his cuts so we could understand and take in what was going on more. See it in 3D for sure.

P.S - Avatar wasn't the other 3D film I enjoyed, it was Tron: Legacy. It's all about value added, not just random 3D... Avatar just felt like 3D for the sake of 3D.

I really want to see it in 3D but my first time is going to be with my family and 3D makes my mom sick as a dog so that's a no go. Maybe next weekend I will take my little brother again for 3D :cool:

Just got back from seeing it, 3D is amazing, never been a huge fan of 3D, didnt even like the 3D in avatar but for Transformers i loved it. While the script i didnt feel was great (not so much the story but the speech) it was a great action film. The CGI effects i thought were amazing, possibly the best iv seen, the fight scenes were awesome. Its defo the best of the 3 films.

Possibly my only complaints would be that the start felt very rushed (felt that if you blinked you'd miss it all) then the middle slowed right right down which made it feel a very long film. You could also tell that alot of the budget went into the effects rather than the script which is a bit annoying, but was a good story line i felt none the less.

Seeing it again at the imax though as the 3D was that good in my opinion

This movie is supposed to be dark, gritty and high octane action which I am sure this delivers in every way and I am sure the majority of the people who see it are expecting the same thing I am. Movie critics are just that, I would love for them to make a movie so we can all cut them down and call there stuff ****! :laugh:

Response to bold and underline: Welp, it's not, it's bright and explosions take place every other thirty seconds.

Response to underline: That's about all it is... brainless action..

Sad to say, the bad acting and cheesiness is still there.. and so are the paid advertisements for products. I can't count how many times you see a Lenovo monitor in shot.

It might be I'm a douchebag *******, but the gay jokes made me laugh. Going to convince the wife to go see it this weekend if she ever stops working. But now, I'm back and might as well stay awake another hour then go for my run, expected I would get bacl earlier from a midnight showing than 330. And I was more annoyed by the blatant Nokia N9 advertising at the end of the movie. It was fun, and that's what movies should be while you watch them, especially the summer blockbuster variety. To me it was well worth the money, especially loved ones.

Shia LaBeouf has revealed that he hooked up with Megan Fox while filming the first two Transformers films.

The actor cautiously nodded in agreement when asked whether the two had developed any romantic feelings during their time together on the film set.

"Look, you're on the set for six months with someone who's rooting to be attracted to you, and you're rooting to be attracted to them," the actor explained to Details magazine.

"I never understood the separation of work and life in that situation. But the time I spent with Megan was our own thing, and I think you can see the chemistry on screen."

When asked whether Fox had been dating her now-husband Brian Austin Green at the time, LaBeouf repeated the phrase "I don't know" 12 times over with different intonations, before adding: "It was what it was."

LaBeouf recently described Fox's absence from Transformers: Dark of the Moon as "a blessing", as it allowed his character Sam Witwicky to have more of a story arc.

can't blame him :p

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

They bother me, and I don't wear glasses. I normally don't go to 3D movies, but the screening for this was free, so I did.

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

I've seen a few 3D movies this way & tbh it doesn't bother me at all. Within minutes I forget about the annoyance.

About the girl, you guy's expectancy must be high. She's no godess but she ain't no dog either. It wouldn't make or break movie for me.

got a question for you guys about 3D.. i've never actually been to see a 3d movie yet, but wanted to see TF3 in 3D, however i wear glasses and was always worried that wearing another pair of glasses over mine would be uncomfortable and generally mess up the 3D experience, anyone with glasses have experience with 3D?

^^ Yes, I wear glasses too (my left eye is short sighted and my right is not =P) and it didn't feel too uncomfortable imo.

Just came back from watching Transformers 3 also and I cried when

Sentinel shot Ironhide

and it made me cry :'( He is my favourite Transformer alongside Bumblebee. Overall I thought the movie was really good and heaps better than the second one. I still prefer the first one though since it has a nice amount of comedy, action and seriousness to it than the other 2. Overall 7/10 for the action and story stuff despite the ending felt really rushed imo.

one things that seam to bother me while watching it

  • Blood (c'mon when do robots bleed lol)
  • Headshots to kill (i always thought u killed the robots via the spark they had)...
    They seam to focus on headshots in the third film, even mention it a few times in the fighting scenes at the end etc...

oh and i wear glasses, they dont really affect the 3D'ness but more of the fact they sit slighty uncomfy on the bridge of my nose but you kinda get use it.

Hot british chicks = Rachel Hurd-Wood, Naomi Watts, Kate Beckinsdale, Elizabeth Hurley (there are more this is just a short list)

And I'd certainly add Rachel Aldana to that list.

Not british but hot = Karen Gillan

Oh hell yeah, give me Amy Pond any day!! My wife (also named Amy) even thinks she's hot!

That being said, we are going to see TF3 in 3D tomorrow afternoon. That's my anniversary present this year (will be married 11 years tomorrow).

Headshots to kill (i always thought u killed the robots via the spark they had)

Optimus used headshots nearly every time he killed another character in the other movies, so that isn't much of a change at all.

And I'd certainly add Rachel Aldana to that list.

I didn't go pron for a reason. There are quite a few adult stars I like. Faith Nelson being one of them.

As far as head shots go, the ROTF video game gave extra bonus for headshots. Headshots is nothing new for the franchise.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!