Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

NoLiMiT06

Posted
Posted
Empty, soulless special-effects laden extravaganza that wows the eyes, but does nothing for the heart or mind. You were expecting something else?

About sums up all of Bay's movies and thats what I like about them. The way a summer action flick should be ;)

Grand Master

NoLiMiT06

Posted
Posted

LoL @ critics commenting on story.

There just mad they don't make the kind of money Bay does :p As I have said before, none of Bay's movies have been that story driven they have been more about the action and how big of a explosion you can get on screen while staying in budget :p

Grand Master

Southern Patriot

Posted
Posted

I didn't go pron for a reason. There are quite a few adult stars I like. Faith Nelson being one of them.

Well, while Faith is a porn star (and a very lovely one at that, even though I don't typically like blondes), I really don't consider Rachel Aldana one since she has only (as far as I've ever seen) done topless and maybe a few nude sets.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

In what way is Karen Gillan not British?

this has been discussed :p

because she is scottish...keep up.

Alicia Rhodes is another pretty hot UK pron star...kind of reminds me of one of the Dr Who's girls (the one in 2005 I think).

I just googled her and oh my :alien:

Grand Master

Scorbing

Posted
Posted

just saw the movie,,, imo transformers just got worse :/ only saving grace was 3D - much better and seamless than avatar imo... as immersive as it can get...

The same thing was said about Transformers 2 and it made almost 1 billion in ticket sales. This one will do the same no matter how bad the reviews are.

Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
The same thing was said about Transformers 2 and it made almost 1 billion in ticket sales. This one will do the same no matter how bad the reviews are.

Didn't comment on ticket sales, commented on the quality of the movie. Sales != great movie!

Grand Master

ThePitt

Posted
Posted
oh... jezzz is not Megan Fox on this movie, I wont see it

Being faithful to that bitch is just wrong. She is a piece of **** in real life.

About the movie?, well, just stupid like was 2 and 1. No storyline, only a retard with thie Michael Bay IQ might like it. Deal with that.

Grand Master

sc302 Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

The movie is about large menacing robots that don't exist. If you ever watched the 80's transformers you would know that there is 0 story line outside of the beginning of the series and there is 0 character development. Bay has done more for the chars then the original series did. I loved the original series which was geared to children under 10. These movies are geared towards 9 to early teens.

To really get into char development the first movie would have been extended or we would have several parts. I honestly don't know of a good action flick that has a good story line. Turn off your brain and enjoy the eye candy, if you can't do that you shouldn't watch anything that centers around fiction, explosions, or action.

I actually stand corrected, one good flick is princess bride. But there were no explosions and there was decent char development. They weren't spending screen time blowing things up or transforming or flying, the majority of it was dialog even during the sword play. Perhaps if action movies did away with the rushing sound effects and motion and more on dialog it would be better suited for you. But in general you can't have sound effects while people are talking, try having a witty battle with someone standing 10 feet away while a jet is thrusting for take off...if you can hear yourself talk that will be the last thing you hear.

Mentor

John Freeman

Posted
Posted

Saw if few days ago in 3D and it was spectacular. thinking about going and seeing it again tonight. This time in 2D. Feels good to be overwhelmed by action and all for a change. But yeah, Sams new girlfriend looks just brain damaged.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Saw if few days ago in 3D and it was spectacular. thinking about going and seeing it again tonight. This time in 2D. Feels good to be overwhelmed by action and all for a change. But yeah, Sams new girlfriend looks just brain damaged.

f2b9bbd7.png

Grand Master

NoLiMiT06

Posted
Posted

Well I went last night to go see it and I loved the movie, we saw it in 2D and it was great except for the fact that the movie was completely out of focus and they would not fix it then the projector lamp goes out...... Still finished the movie and we got tickets to see it in 3D for free! Just got back from the 3D version and it was amazing, by far the best of the series IMO. I can't wait for the Blu-Ray release so I can *iss off my neighbors :D Sam's new girl is growing on me :blush: Megan Fox might have been a tad hotter on the hotness scale but this girl is more real to me :rofl: Still want to see it in IMAX but our IMAX is sorry as hell and are only showing Cars 2 and Harry Potter :angry:

Grand Master

DirtyLarry Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Saw it in 3D today, went to a matinee.

I was entertained, definitely.

Effects were pretty astounding to be honest, I would say easily the best effects of this type. Meaning just the hyper realistic really technical effects. Just the whole part of if that takes place in Chicago, pretty amazing visually.

As far as acting, just incredibly cheesy, nothing really good about it at all. I actually felt slightly embarrassed for John Malkovich and Frances Mcdormand the acting is pretty much that bad. And stupid LaBoof really just annoys me.

Story was also pretty much forgettable.

Then again, I did not go to see this movie for the acting or the story, I went for the effects and nothing else, and from that standpoint, I am absolutely satisfied.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android

      By ad47uk · Posted

      UK need to do the same thing as well,
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026

      By ad47uk · Posted

      I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android

      By zikalify · Posted

      Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!