Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

Yup, plus you have to remember, Megatron's body at that point was pieces of his original body, mashed up with a couple grunt decepticons from his resurrection, with even more garage modifications apparently between movie 2 and 3. By this point I'd say it's safe to say he was nowhere near his original strength, plus he was kinda off his rocker after losing so many times. Overall I think the point they were trying to convey was that this Megatron is not the same as he was in the first movie.

that or you can't have two major antagonists. Remember, the 1st and 2nd movies were all about Megatron. The third one, not so much, it was more towards Sentinel Prime. Just think, even Shockwave (as big of a character as he is) is just filler. I'm just happy Soundwave got more screen time! :D

that or you can't have two major antagonists. Remember, the 1st and 2nd movies were all about Megatron. The third one, not so much, it was more towards Sentinel Prime. Just think, even Shockwave (as big of a character as he is) is just filler. I'm just happy Soundwave got more screen time! :D

IMO The Fallen was the central antagonist in the second movie.

Anyway, I was pleasantly surprised to hear Leonard Nimoy's voice. I especially liked the reference to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.

While pretty much everyone seems to have caught the obvious one, did you catch the subtle one that I mentioned earlier

(the "my friend" in Bumblebee's farewell to Sam)

?

Enjoyed it a lot! Love the twist on the Apollo missions and history. A lot of re-used footage though (Not just the island scenes... or the missile room footage... ) but the re-use of Apollo footage and nixon etc was all great. However it was pretty obvious when they switched to newly recorded stuff...

While pretty much everyone seems to have caught the obvious one, did you catch the subtle one that I mentioned earlier

(the "my friend" in Bumblebee's farewell to Sam)

?

I caught that one as well because I always pay extra attention to Bumblebee's radio voices. :)

Saw it tonight in 3d.

Only seen a few 3d films and this was by far the best.

i also think its probably the best of the trilogy.

i didn't pay atttention to the depth of the script of anything, but the NSA general lady with blonde hair annoyed the hell out of me.

if she was in charge of the autobots being on earth or w/e her role was, surely she would have known about Sam and what he has done and why he should be involved in everything, rather than try stopping him being involved. her attitude to it all was one thing that annoyed me in the movie

i would also have liked to have known

where the other tiny robot came from (not the one from T2) and also where the other new autobots came from. AND finally, what about the other decepticons that were all over the planet, i find it hard to believe that no more than approx 10 autobots survived and escaped cybertron but theres 100's of decepticons

Overall, for what it was, its clearly going to be my favourite movie.

They kept calling her national intelligence director which could be the person who oversees all of the intelligence in out country. But the title is Director of National Intelligence so maybe it's something else.

they stated their ship brought the second wave of autobots. And as for the number of deceptions with the autobots losing wouldn't it make sense that there would be more of the other side?

While pretty much everyone seems to have caught the obvious one, did you catch the subtle one that I mentioned earlier

(the "my friend" in Bumblebee's farewell to Sam)

?

Caught that, wasn't that subtle. Did you catch

Bee calling Sam an "ass h0le again?

:laugh:

IMO The Fallen was the central antagonist in the second movie.

yeah my bad on that. Was trying to make a point. lol.

It's not wrong if someone says they didn't like the film. It generally means they are unique to you.

Generally, I found Transformers 3 boring with some fun action sequences and interesting scenes. Some scenes had amazing direction but the mass of the film was a bore for me.

At times Transformers 3 really felt special like the old cartoons, though it would just end up coming back to watching weird uninteresting scenes.

I'm not a grump, but I was disappointed to see young children watching this film with humans flesh being vaporised on screen and so much swearing and insulting.

The parent can't be fully to blame for taking their kids to a film like this and subjecting them to, in the children's eyes, cool robots swearing at each other. Parents trust the rating, which has clearly failed.

If I had taken my kids to this film I'd have gotten up and walked out.

The parent can't be fully to blame for taking their kids to a film like this and subjecting them to, in the children's eyes, cool robots swearing at each other. Parents trust the rating, which has clearly failed.

I have no idea about the rating that it got in the UK (it isn't listed on IMDB), but here in the US, it got a PG-13 rating:

Rated PG-13 for intense prolonged sequences of sci-fi action violence, mayhem and destruction, and for language, some sexuality and innuendo
, which I think is reasonable. And yes, it is very much the parents fault if they take a young child to see a movie like this without seeing it themselves first. My wife and I went to see it first before allowing our son to see it, even though he has watched the other two movies.

Caught that, wasn't that subtle. Did you catch

Bee calling Sam an "ass h0le again?

:laugh:

It was subtle enough that my wife didn't catch it until I pointed it out, although she has only ever seen The Wrath of Kahn maybe once or twice (she isn't a huge Star Trek fan like me). Certainly not obvious enough for most non-Trekkies to catch it. And yes, I caught that one as well.

I'm not a grump, but I was disappointed to see young children watching this film with humans flesh being vaporised on screen and so much swearing and insulting.

The parent can't be fully to blame for taking their kids to a film like this and subjecting them to, in the children's eyes, cool robots swearing at each other. Parents trust the rating, which has clearly failed.

If I had taken my kids to this film I'd have gotten up and walked out.

I think PG-13 was the appropriate rating. There was not as much language as in the 2nd one and the people getting vaporized was only in the foreground in one real scene.

It's not wrong if someone says they didn't like the film. It generally means they are unique to you.

Generally, I found Transformers 3 boring with some fun action sequences and interesting scenes. Some scenes had amazing direction but the mass of the film was a bore for me.

At times Transformers 3 really felt special like the old cartoons, though it would just end up coming back to watching weird uninteresting scenes.

I'm not a grump, but I was disappointed to see young children watching this film with humans flesh being vaporised on screen and so much swearing and insulting.

The parent can't be fully to blame for taking their kids to a film like this and subjecting them to, in the children's eyes, cool robots swearing at each other. Parents trust the rating, which has clearly failed.

If I had taken my kids to this film I'd have gotten up and walked out.

Newsflash: Kids hear swearing all day long at school.

I think PG-13 was the appropriate rating.

PG-13 is the US rating, I can't seem to find a reference for what it was rated in the UK (where SPARTdAN lives).

edit: OK, it seems it is rated 12A which is roughly equivalent to our PG-13 rating.

Personally I liked the money. It wasn't a classic or anything near that, but it was a fun, mindless two hours of violence. That's what I was expecting and they delivered that perfectly.

Pretty much my opinion of it. thumbs_up.gif

I didn't go in expecting anything profound, I knew what I was going to get long before the movie hit the cinemas and I was fine with it.

what?. What movie did you see?. It was ****. Completely pile of ****. The acting of that ****ing crap actor and the now with the new michael bay sex toy. Come on!.

Where was the violence?. I only see in 3D an old couple dressed in GREEN with sexual problems. His MOMMY has sexual (orientations? ya, why not) problems and his father has erectile problems. Thats all I saw. IN 3D!!.

The new sex toy was alright, I would like see her acting sometime, but you cant explect that much from a doll. The rest of the movie was more of the same if not worse. The CGI is getting ****ty, every movie more and the script, well, who the **** want a script when you want to see explosions?. but f*** that.

They all seems to be hysterical and with sexual problems. In fact I think is based on the michael bay personality, it has an emotion of a 40 years post menopausal woman, that little piece of ****. Millionaire, but a piece of ****. hysterical piece of ****.

**** you michael bay, give me my ****ing money back, you ****in thief!

Lol, over dramatic much?

He didn't force you to go see it, it was pretty damn obvious what the film was going to be like from the previous two and the reviews, you have only yourself to blame for spending money to go to the cinema to see it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!