Transformers: Dark of the Moon (Transformers 3)


Recommended Posts

Rosie Huntington-Whiteley owes more to Victoria's Secret than a congratulations video.

The British lingerie model, who recently won Megan Fox's role in "Transformers 3," wore a white transparent lingerie top and panties to her love scene audition with Shia LaBeouf, Hollywood Life reports. 778212024m.gif

"She had to meet Shia to see if they gelled," an on-set source told the magazine. "Having her in as little clothing as possible was just the icing on the cake. When she walked down a staircase in that outfit - wow.?

Last week, deadline.com confirmed that Jason Statham's girlfriend was Fox's successor in the third installment of Michael Bay's blockbuster.

Following the announcement, Victoria's Secret released a video montage congratulating Huntington-Whiteley on her first movie role.

The 23-year-old Brit became the "T3" front-runner - beating out Sarah Wright and SI cover girl Brooklyn Decker - after auditioning for Bay in early May.

The filmmaker only had a week left to decide who would take the place of Fox, who was reportedly fired because she lost too much weight.

"No matter what people spin or say, Megan Fox was fired," the source told Hollywood Life. "She was very bitchy on the first two films; she always had an attitude. So it wasn?t a surprise that she got booted from the third film."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2010/06/02/2010-06-02_rosie_huntingtonwhiteley_wore_transparent_lingerie_to_transformers_3_audition_wi.html#ixzz0ppotFrUA

Rosie Huntington-Whiteley owes more to Victoria's Secret than a congratulations video.

The British lingerie model, who recently won Megan Fox's role in "Transformers 3," wore a white transparent lingerie top and panties to her love scene audition with Shia LaBeouf, Hollywood Life reports. 778212024m.gif

"She had to meet Shia to see if they gelled," an on-set source told the magazine. "Having her in as little clothing as possible was just the icing on the cake. When she walked down a staircase in that outfit - wow.?

Last week, deadline.com confirmed that Jason Statham's girlfriend was Fox's successor in the third installment of Michael Bay's blockbuster.

Following the announcement, Victoria's Secret released a video montage congratulating Huntington-Whiteley on her first movie role.

The 23-year-old Brit became the "T3" front-runner - beating out Sarah Wright and SI cover girl Brooklyn Decker - after auditioning for Bay in early May.

The filmmaker only had a week left to decide who would take the place of Fox, who was reportedly fired because she lost too much weight.

"No matter what people spin or say, Megan Fox was fired," the source told Hollywood Life. "She was very bitchy on the first two films; she always had an attitude. So it wasn?t a surprise that she got booted from the third film."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2010/06/02/2010-06-02_rosie_huntingtonwhiteley_wore_transparent_lingerie_to_transformers_3_audition_wi.html#ixzz0ppotFrUA

Is that right??. :rolleyes:

Her lips in some photos, her nose in others... I can?t say I really find her more attractive than Megan... But they seem to be a bit alike which is good if she is to replace Megan as Mikaela or be a relative as some sugest but seriously... Mikaela is gone/dead and a missing sister/cousin shows up out of nowhere? Looks almost as silly as Martin twin brother in the original "V"... :D

I think it's ironic that Megan Fox (who I'm not fan of mind you) got fired or left the movie because she got "too thin" and had a big blow off with Bay. Now, this is coming from the director who said (and I'm paraphrasing here) "You don't need to act, your hot just look hot don't act". And now Bay thinks Fox was thin, and hires this woman who looks like a cross between a Twilight vampire and a robotic rubber doll you can buy online? Not to mention she's so thin Shia my man could break her in a half with his famous NO NO NO line?

Rightttt Bay, right.

187355809t.jpg661821664t.jpg

Rosie Huntington-Whiteley carries an Alexander Wang handbag as she arrives on set to shoot scenes for Transformers 3.

The 23-year-old model is taking over Megan Fox?s spot as Shia LaBeouf?s co-star in the hit franchise.

Other pictures inside include Rosie with her boyfriend, Jason Statham, and his new Audi R8 at his place in Hollywood Hills!

Jason is back in town after working on his new film, The Killer Elite, in Melbourne, Australia (also pictured).

Read more: http://justjared.buzznet.com/2010/06/07/rosie-huntington-whiteley-first-transformers-3-pics/#ixzz0qGjTEiPL

Anthony Breznican has a new article on Transformers 3 titled ?Next ?Transformers? is due for a switch? which mostly consists of director Michael Bay and producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura explaining what went wrong with the previous installment, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (blamed mostly on the rushed schedule and writers strike). There are a few interesting bits about the newest film to be found in the article, here is a sample:

* Final confirmation that movie will be released in 3D. No word on if it will be shot in 3D or converted in post. Knowing Bay?s obsession with film, I?m assuming he agreed on a post process.

* The villain in Transformers 3 is ?Shockwave, the robot cyclops-turned-laser-cannon, who became dictator of their home world of Cybertron after the other Autobots and Decepticons journeyed to Earth.? Makes sense.

* Bay claims ?One thing we?re getting rid of is what I call the dorky comedy? adding the The Twins are ?basically gone? but comic relief John Turturro returns. Bay?s ?basically gone? comment seems to confirm that they have a short appearance in the film.

* In the new film Sam Witwicky is ?taking his first tenuous steps into adulthood while remaining a reluctant human ally of Optimus Prime. ?Shia has this great line: ?You know, I?ve saved the world twice, but I can?t get a job.?? Okay, so Transformers is never gonna get a screenplay nomination at the Academy Awards.

* The plot also ?delves into the space race between the U.S.S.R. and the USA, suggesting there was a hidden Transformers role in it all that remains one of the planet?s most dangerous secrets. ?The movie is more of a mystery,? Bay says. ?It ties in what we know as history growing up as kids with what really happened.?

* Transformers 3 is the end of a trilogy. Bay says ?As a trilogy, it really ends. It could be rebooted again, but I think it has a really killer ending.? It basically sounds like Bay is done with the series, and the ending of the movie is a finale of sorts.

* The film also features a set ?built to resemble a dilapidated nuclear reactor.?

Read more: Transformers 3: 3D Release Confirmed, Villain and Plot Details Revealed, The End of the Trilogy | /Film http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/06/10/transformer-3-3d-release-confirmed-villain-and-plot-details-revealed-the-end-of-the-trilogy/#ixzz0qVd9cdhP

If they don't include Stan Bush's The Touch in there somewhere, I'm going to be VERY disappointed :(

I highly doubt an 80's song will make its way into featuring in a 2012 film based on futuristic sentient robots. Sorry, I just can't sit it working.

I highly doubt an 80's song will make its way into featuring in a 2012 film based on futuristic sentient robots. Sorry, I just can't sit it working.

you just never know with Bay :rofl:

Wow, it's been so long since I heard that song. I didn't even know they re-made it. Anyway, I'm surprised - no, shocked - that Megan Fox was replaced. Her replacement doesn't look nearly as attractive as her. She looks so... plastic, if you know what I mean. Megan Fox is so much better looking.

* Transformers 3 is the end of a trilogy. Bay says ?As a trilogy, it really ends. It could be rebooted again, but I think it has a really killer ending.? It basically sounds like Bay is done with the series, and the ending of the movie is a finale of sorts.

* The film also features a set ?built to resemble a dilapidated nuclear reactor.?

So Does this mean he is going to kill of some of the main characters? Optmus?

I highly doubt an 80's song will make its way into featuring in a 2012 film based on futuristic sentient robots. Sorry, I just can't sit it working.

its not Transformers without Stan Bush.

789923219.jpg

The picture of a rather odd robot is from Ain't It Cool News. The pic is reported to have been taken from the Chicago set for Transformers 3 with the robot being called "Bruiser". No other context was provided. If this is for Transformers 3, then the name is likely a placeholder name and of course CGI will likely add some life to the prop.

For reasons I can't nail down, that robot makes me think "Frankenstein's monster". This in turns makes me think that maybe a plot element is an attempt by humans to re-create Transformer technology but that is just speculation on my part.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!