MW2: No Dedicated Servers, No Mods


Recommended Posts

http://games.on.net/article/7188/Modern_Wa..._for_PC_version

"Call of Duty community manager Rob Bowling, also known as 'fourzerotwo', has confirmed in a podcast that the PC version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 will not support user-created mods. Worse, it will not support dedicated servers. PC gamers will have to suffer peer-to-peer connections, just like their console-owning cousins."

Anyone else wish they told us this prior to pre-ordering?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/835476-mw2-no-dedicated-servers-no-mods/
Share on other sites

Have a pretty good feeling a few months later, should poor sales for the PC version surface, they will pin this on piracy and consider pulling the PC "port" for future versions.

i honestly do not see this being too much of a problem for the game play i understand with P2P you run the risk of poor connections effecting everyone however depending on what features they implement for matchmaking they can do a connection check to make sure that people are not simply running on a crap connection and setting them up with faster people which would slow everyone down. however being that they are doing this same thing with the consoles and it works i do not understand as to why it would be too much issue with the PC version of the game. Just my opinion (and im getting the PS3 version anyway)

i honestly do not see this being too much of a problem for the game play i understand with P2P you run the risk of poor connections effecting everyone however depending on what features they implement for matchmaking they can do a connection check to make sure that people are not simply running on a crap connection and setting them up with faster people which would slow everyone down. however being that they are doing this same thing with the consoles and it works i do not understand as to why it would be too much issue with the PC version of the game. Just my opinion (and im getting the PS3 version anyway)

P2P usually fails in games

demigod comes to mind, the slideslow multiplayer game

Why all the fuss?

People into online gaming must have at least 512Kb/s upload rates. That's more than enough to host a match.

It's not like everyone's still using dial up :p

A lot (and I mean a LOT) of people play online with a 256kbps down / 128kbps up connections.

Have a pretty good feeling a few months later, should poor sales for the PC version surface, they will pin this on piracy and consider pulling the PC "port" for future versions.

Nail. Head. Hit.

I didn't have a pre-order because I was planning to buy it on day 1 and get stuck into the single player campaign first. Now I'll just borrow a friends copy (if any of them still get it) and play that first. By the time I'm done with the single player the dust should have settled a little and I'll see what state the multiplayer is in before deciding if it's worth buying it or to just stick with MW. I like the idea of standardised game settings but the test will be how well the matchmaking and user-hosted stuff works.

Do they live in Afghanistan by any chance? I can't get less than 2MB nowadays.

AFAIK, most ISP's offer really cheap internet plans that are <1MB, my ISP gives me 30down/1up for 60 a month, and thats really expensive by most standards

their only reasonable rate is around 30 bucks, for a sub 1mb connecton

and that doesnt count one of the main issues against P2P gaming, ISP's could falsely throttle it

I hardly no any ISP here in the UK that offers decent upload rates. im on a 2.5mb line and have an upload rate between 200-300, unless your on cable or close to the exchange if ur on adsl you get shocking upload rates and i reckon thats gona be the same for a lot of ppl

Do they live in Afghanistan by any chance? I can't get less than 2MB nowadays.

Here in the UK I have to get 20Mb internet just to get 0.7Mb upload. You don't wanna know what you get on 8Mb or 10Mb.

And 16 players would be laggy with 512 connections let alone 32 players. And what sort of tick rate are you going to get? Nothing decent. Also custom maps?? Sit there for half an hour downloading a map from some guys 512Kb upload? Seriously?

That is if you can even use custom maps. I don't think you can?

Here in the UK I have to get 20Mb internet just to get 0.7Mb upload. You don't wanna know what you get on 8Mb or 10Mb.

I've got an 8/1 (scrap that, it's been bumped to 10/1 2 months ago) connection and it's a relatively low speed connection. How can you guys live like that? :p :rofl:

And 16 players would be laggy with 512 connections let alone 32 players.

I don't know, I remember playing Quake through dial-up with a few other guys, no problems at all.

Why all the fuss?

People into online gaming must have at least 512Kb/s upload rates. That's more than enough to host a match.

It's not like everyone's still using dial up :p

From my experience with l4d and any other game I've played, local hosted matches are always just awful compared to using a server even with a decent connection. And if the person's pc crashes, by by game.

Edited by ViperAFK
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It depends, but it's also going to push more adoption of open source AI models that can run locally, I'm seeing a pattern among the US and China when it comes to closed and open source AI models, they close when they feel they have the advantage, open up when they feel they don't. This has little to do with security and everything to do with control, the irony is that the ones that do go open and get the community behind them are the ones that have the real control, hence why we keep seeing this seesaw from closed to open. Ultimately, it's far too dangerous to let any one country or corporation to control AI, which is why open source AI or AI you can run locally on your hardware is very likely going to be the future of AI over the long run, this is especially the case as AI becomes more powerful and useful for user, privacy, security and censorship will become more of an issue for users and businesses.
    • A person should only be required to click through to an article if they want to know more details. The headline should give basic facts. A basic fact would include the name of the service being shut down.
    • That would probably be a good outcome, but it would also require other "features" be changed to comply, such as Auto play, scrolling, and advertising. Having the laws shift these platforms back to a socially responsible and useful places is a benefit for everyone. The addictive nature is the problem, and while many blame the individual, psychologists would suggest the platform is using a well trodden playbook to hook in more revenue..
    • It is in fact being discontinued in the US in July.
    • It was a rather nice rant as I rather dislike when people support the shitifcation of the Internet. My comment also factually applied the definition of "clickbait' to this headline unlike your comment. I have been reading this site for some 20 years now so I will call them out when they are doing carp they shouldn't be doing but thanks for your concern. You can't even do a search by headline anymore to do a quick search to find something because most of the titles lack all the relevant keywords that should be there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      114
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!