MW2: No Dedicated Servers, No Mods


Recommended Posts

http://games.on.net/article/7188/Modern_Wa..._for_PC_version

"Call of Duty community manager Rob Bowling, also known as 'fourzerotwo', has confirmed in a podcast that the PC version of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 will not support user-created mods. Worse, it will not support dedicated servers. PC gamers will have to suffer peer-to-peer connections, just like their console-owning cousins."

Anyone else wish they told us this prior to pre-ordering?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/835476-mw2-no-dedicated-servers-no-mods/
Share on other sites

Have a pretty good feeling a few months later, should poor sales for the PC version surface, they will pin this on piracy and consider pulling the PC "port" for future versions.

i honestly do not see this being too much of a problem for the game play i understand with P2P you run the risk of poor connections effecting everyone however depending on what features they implement for matchmaking they can do a connection check to make sure that people are not simply running on a crap connection and setting them up with faster people which would slow everyone down. however being that they are doing this same thing with the consoles and it works i do not understand as to why it would be too much issue with the PC version of the game. Just my opinion (and im getting the PS3 version anyway)

i honestly do not see this being too much of a problem for the game play i understand with P2P you run the risk of poor connections effecting everyone however depending on what features they implement for matchmaking they can do a connection check to make sure that people are not simply running on a crap connection and setting them up with faster people which would slow everyone down. however being that they are doing this same thing with the consoles and it works i do not understand as to why it would be too much issue with the PC version of the game. Just my opinion (and im getting the PS3 version anyway)

P2P usually fails in games

demigod comes to mind, the slideslow multiplayer game

Why all the fuss?

People into online gaming must have at least 512Kb/s upload rates. That's more than enough to host a match.

It's not like everyone's still using dial up :p

A lot (and I mean a LOT) of people play online with a 256kbps down / 128kbps up connections.

Have a pretty good feeling a few months later, should poor sales for the PC version surface, they will pin this on piracy and consider pulling the PC "port" for future versions.

Nail. Head. Hit.

I didn't have a pre-order because I was planning to buy it on day 1 and get stuck into the single player campaign first. Now I'll just borrow a friends copy (if any of them still get it) and play that first. By the time I'm done with the single player the dust should have settled a little and I'll see what state the multiplayer is in before deciding if it's worth buying it or to just stick with MW. I like the idea of standardised game settings but the test will be how well the matchmaking and user-hosted stuff works.

Do they live in Afghanistan by any chance? I can't get less than 2MB nowadays.

AFAIK, most ISP's offer really cheap internet plans that are <1MB, my ISP gives me 30down/1up for 60 a month, and thats really expensive by most standards

their only reasonable rate is around 30 bucks, for a sub 1mb connecton

and that doesnt count one of the main issues against P2P gaming, ISP's could falsely throttle it

I hardly no any ISP here in the UK that offers decent upload rates. im on a 2.5mb line and have an upload rate between 200-300, unless your on cable or close to the exchange if ur on adsl you get shocking upload rates and i reckon thats gona be the same for a lot of ppl

Do they live in Afghanistan by any chance? I can't get less than 2MB nowadays.

Here in the UK I have to get 20Mb internet just to get 0.7Mb upload. You don't wanna know what you get on 8Mb or 10Mb.

And 16 players would be laggy with 512 connections let alone 32 players. And what sort of tick rate are you going to get? Nothing decent. Also custom maps?? Sit there for half an hour downloading a map from some guys 512Kb upload? Seriously?

That is if you can even use custom maps. I don't think you can?

Here in the UK I have to get 20Mb internet just to get 0.7Mb upload. You don't wanna know what you get on 8Mb or 10Mb.

I've got an 8/1 (scrap that, it's been bumped to 10/1 2 months ago) connection and it's a relatively low speed connection. How can you guys live like that? :p :rofl:

And 16 players would be laggy with 512 connections let alone 32 players.

I don't know, I remember playing Quake through dial-up with a few other guys, no problems at all.

Why all the fuss?

People into online gaming must have at least 512Kb/s upload rates. That's more than enough to host a match.

It's not like everyone's still using dial up :p

From my experience with l4d and any other game I've played, local hosted matches are always just awful compared to using a server even with a decent connection. And if the person's pc crashes, by by game.

Edited by ViperAFK
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Weechat. https://weechat.org/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!