MW2: No Dedicated Servers, No Mods


Recommended Posts

If true, woah :|

Hard to ever verify claims like that though.

Indeed. I'm having a hard enough time believing it myself.

Still though, if true, it's good to see people are speaking with their dollar. Last thing we should be doing is reaching for the astroglide...

It's never too late for IW to go back on this "change" either, so if sales really do suck, they always have the option of fixing it. Though, I'm more willing to believe they'll just claim piracy did it, and stop releasing for PC.

Indeed. I'm having a hard enough time believing it myself.

Still though, if true, it's good to see people are speaking with their dollar. Last thing we should be doing is reaching for the astroglide...

It's never too late for IW to go back on this "change" either, so if sales really do suck, they always have the option of fixing it. Though, I'm more willing to believe they'll just claim piracy did it, and stop releasing for PC.

If anyone deserves their game pirated, its Infinity Ward with MW2 now after this news came out to the light.

They'll end up blaming piracy anyways.

Netcode hasn't changed that much. And why would physics be calculated on the server anyway?

You just need to make sure every client is in sync, everything else is done on the client. All clients do the same processing in the same way. I'm not gonna jump any higher on my machine than in yours. All that is transfered is a status snapshot, everyone syncs, game moves on. Not exactly a bandwidth hog. Like has been said before, what matters is having a low rtt.

It makes more sense. One problem with older games is that because they don't calculate it on the server, some player movements can actually be pretty erratic which can seriously spoil the general gaming experience

but isnt that Activision's decision about the servers and mods, not IW's ?

There seems to be conflicting views on that online. In any case, fourzerotwo was the one who was given the task of breaking the news, so he's become the conduit between management and the angry CoD fanbase. But it'll come down to IW to put it back in (at a push I guess they could issue a Day 1 patch restoring at least the dedicated server).

If those figures are true and cancellations are that high then it's a significant event in the general decline of PC gaming as a whole. Poor quality ports have been angering PC gamers for long enough and this looks like it may have been the straw that broke the camel's back. A week ago, MW2 on PC was a juggernaut that couldn't be stopped. I'm sure it played some part in other titles deciding to push release dates back into Q1 2010. In the space of just a few days it's now looking like it could be dead on arrival. That's a hell of a swing. Maybe now developers and publishers will stand up and take notice and start treating PC gamers as customers again and not assuming they'll take any old crap that's dished out to them.

So for us pc'ers though, our top FPS this year is cod4 and l4d right? lol. I'm not purchasing l4d2 at 50 bucks again, since l4d was supposed to be a game that would keep on giving.... and cod42 was supposed to be awesomeness in a box, instead of the total opposite we have been told.

PCers need to stick up for their $. We put a lot of effort to be able to play their games into our rigs, and for them to constantly deliver crap and think we should pay up for it is just insane. There is a reason people pirate, and they have given it to us countless times.

We put a lot of effort to be able to play their games into our rigs, and for them to constantly deliver crap and think we should pay up for it is just insane. There is a reason people pirate, and they have given it to us countless times.

Please... if games are crap don't play them. It's not a reason to pirate.

There is a reason people pirate, and they have given it to us countless times.

Right, You can't justify piracy like this. If you can't afford a game you save up and buy it. If you think it's not worth the money, you don't buy it or you wait for the price to drop. You either want the product or you don't want it.

Right, You can't justify piracy like this. If you can't afford a game you save up and buy it. If you think it's not worth the money, you don't buy it or you wait for the price to drop. You either want the product or you don't want it.

It's not about affording a game, its about the principle behind what they implement in the game. The game most likely wont be crap either, but what they have put into it, or left out, will make it less than what it should be. They know the playing field they are going into. PC'ers, just like consolers, can pirate any game really. What sales games is replay, how the company treats their customer, and what is offered. When a company does not offer what they should, people can turn somewhere else. When you know what your getting into, you can't cry fowl when you do something wrong and it doesn't go your way. There is no other way to show them what we want or mean besides pirating it. If no one buys it, they think no one wanted it. If we pirate it, they will see we wanted it, but hopefully as well see where they went wrong with the customers. Don't like it dont play it works, but I also like my rule, "I like it, but it's not worth what you want, and this guy has it for a better offer."

Infinity War Has Made An Official Response

Predictably, nerds across world took to the Internet with a wailing and a gnashing of teeth that would make the Left 4 Dead community proud. An online petition to bring back dedicated servers at the time of this writing stands at 100,000+ signatures. However -- and this may shock some gamers with advanced persecution complexes -- this move was not made to tweak the noses of the PC community. Infinity Ward heads Jason West and Vince Zampella explain the decision as a conscious effort to improve their game for the vast majority of their players.

"We're just prioritizing the player experience above the modders and the tuners," says West. He points toward the mounting feedback IW has received from PC fans of Modern Warfare who couldn't find a decent server to play on between all of the cheaters, the insular communities, and huge skill level disparities that the original game's community fractured into. "We thought maybe it would be cool if the fans could play the game," he laughs.

IW says that gameplay concerns for the majority of MW2 players are the overriding reasons for the decision. Zampella downplays the obvious piracy prevention angle (IW has cited numbers of people online playing illegal copies of Modern Warfare up to 60 percent). "The Steam stuff helps with the piracy. I don't know that the matchmaking stuff does," he notes. West takes a shot at the motives behind some of the outrage, noting that there's money to made by selling dedicates servers and adspace on them: "It's a little dubious. Some of the people complaining are complaining with their pocketbook."

Again and again during our conversation, West and Zampella hammer the point that hardcore PC players lose very little to this change relative to the returns that casual to moderate fans will see. Clans can set up private matches to do their training or what have you; all they lose is the ability to customize the game on a deeper level with mods and such. Infinity Ward sees the addition of solid matchmaking and community support like IW-run tournaments to the PC as a huge win, and not something that could be done under the old system.

Why not have both? West does not want to include dedicated servers alongside the custom-built backend, stating that it would just "bifurcate the community."

http://gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/200...r-response.aspx

I bolded out the parts I thought were most interesting.

Infinity Ward Responds To PC Fanboys' Dedicated Server Woes

Modern Warfare fansite bashandslash.com recently reported that Infinity Ward is removing dedicated server functionality from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. With dedicated servers and the server browser that comes with them replaced with custom-built matchmaking, PC gamers will have an online experience functionally identical to console players. Among other things, this means that clans can't run their own servers with their own mods and rulesets for their own private (or public, if they feel like crushing some scrubs for giggles) use.

Predictably, nerds across world took to the Internet with a wailing and a gnashing of teeth that would make the Left 4 Dead community proud. An online petition to bring back dedicated servers at the time of this writing stands at 100,000+ signatures. However -- and this may shock some gamers with advanced persecution complexes -- this move was not made to tweak the noses of the PC community. Infinity Ward heads Jason West and Vince Zampella explain the decision as a conscious effort to improve their game for the vast majority of their players.

"We're just prioritizing the player experience above the modders and the tuners," says West. He points toward the mounting feedback IW has received from PC fans of Modern Warfare who couldn't find a decent server to play on between all of the cheaters, the insular communities, and huge skill level disparities that the original game's community fractured into. "We thought maybe it would be cool if the fans could play the game," he laughs.

IW says that gameplay concerns for the majority of MW2 players are the overriding reasons for the decision. Zampella downplays the obvious piracy prevention angle (IW has cited numbers of people online playing illegal copies of Modern Warfare up to 60 percent). "The Steam stuff helps with the piracy. I don't know that the matchmaking stuff does," he notes. West takes a shot at the motives behind some of the outrage, noting that there's money to made by selling dedicates servers and adspace on them: "It's a little dubious. Some of the people complaining are complaining with their pocketbook."

Again and again during our conversation, West and Zampella hammer the point that hardcore PC players lose very little to this change relative to the returns that casual to moderate fans will see. Clans can set up private matches to do their training or what have you; all they lose is the ability to customize the game on a deeper level with mods and such. Infinity Ward sees the addition of solid matchmaking and community support like IW-run tournaments to the PC as a huge win, and not something that could be done under the old system.

Why not have both? West does not want to include dedicated servers alongside the custom-built backend, stating that it would just "bifurcate the community."

"PC Fanboys"?

"Predictably, nerds across world took to the Internet with a wailing and a gnashing of teeth that would make the Left 4 Dead community proud. An online petition to bring back dedicated servers at the time of this writing stands at 100,000+ signatures. However -- and this may shock some gamers with advanced persecution complexes -- this move was not made to tweak the noses of the PC community."

What a ****ing tosser. Adam, I hope you never get a job else where.

Edit: forgot the link - http://bit.ly/48mD3N

Edited by Spookie

so lets dumb it down for the downs syndrome kids to play.... why do we always have to dumb stuff down to get a larger user base.... why can't we set the bar a little higher, and have people actually show some intelligence in something they do, no matter how mundane or useless it really is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!