Stardock: Steam Has 70% Of PC Download Market


Recommended Posts

500x_steam.jpg

Just about everybody involved with digital distribution is coy when it comes to sales numbers. Nobody wants to give the game away. But that doesn't stop some - like publishers/online retailers Stardock - from trying to guess! Stardock boss Brad Wardell says "Our estimation is that Steam - as the current market leader - enjoys approximately 70 percent of the overall digital distribution market with Impulse at 10 percent and all others combined at 20 percent in terms of actual dollars generated per month".

While we have our doubts that Stardock's Impulse service is at #2 (surely Direct2Drive is bigger?), Steam's 70% figure is - if it checks out - both interesting and frightening at the same time. That's about the same level of market domination Apple enjoys in the music player scene.

Quick: name another portable music device that's not an iPod. Off the top of your head. Now tell me how many people you know own an iPod compared to a portable music device that's not an iPod.

Exactly.

Source: http://kotaku.com/5409036/stardock-steam-h...download-market

Create a game so popular its still being played today, then force customers to download it, plus all updates through their own service rather than buy it in stores, add in bonus levels that can only be downloaded through it and there you have your market dominance :p

Create a game so popular its still being played today, then force customers to download it, plus all updates through their own service rather than buy it in stores, add in bonus levels that can only be downloaded through it and there you have your market dominance :p

Makes sense and I'm sure Stardock is doing the same thing (can you download their games through Steam?)

IMO, Steam is the best service around. I wouldn't switch to another online distribution channel if I were paid to.

While we have our doubts that Stardock's Impulse service is at #2 (surely Direct2Drive is bigger?), Steam's 70% figure is - if it checks out - both interesting and frightening at the same time.

It won't be long before the E.U. will be involved in that.

I see these platforms kind of like equivalents of PSN/XBL on the PC.

I have steam installed, it caters for so many of my games, it's a complete pain in the ass to install another program, have another service running on my PC, and another list of games to manage.

These are closed systems on what is an open piece of hardware. You update your games through them, you boot your games through them, you redownload your games through them. Everything has to go through them.

I think this is the one instance where I enjoy a dominant service, so I don't need to bother with installing 10 of them and having them all run at once on my PC just to get exclusive games each of them have. It helps steam is actually really good at what it does, and Valve are a good PC development company.

Biggest competitor I see is DRM free services like Direct2Drive.

If only their servers were any good, sometimes you can get your maximum speed, sometimes it crawls at 1 KB/s.. Updates at first start are terrible and put my friend off Steam...

Overall I like Steam for the simplicity, but sometimes the simplicity hurts the game itself - mods and such are sometimes a bit hard to install / run.

I do not like Steam for their prices but do like them for their simplicity.

They don't set the prices, the developers / publishers do, which is why you often see them being the same price as retail copies. Valve's games are usually half price for me. :s

They don't set the prices, the developers / publishers do, which is why you often see them being the same price as retail copies. Valve's games are usually half price for me. :s

Really? I did not know this, I thought they had to price them high because Steam takes a chunk of the profits? I maybe wrong, don't really know much about it if I can be honest.

Really? I did not know this, I thought they had to price them high because Steam takes a chunk of the profits? I maybe wrong, don't really know much about it if I can be honest.

Over here L4D2 is $110 in store, but it's $54.37 from Steam. If a game is priced high on steam it's because the developer/publisher wants it to be.

I know that. I'm just saying that it'll be challenged in the E.U. at some point.

I don't see why, I can't think of any recent actions by the E.U. against companies that got their market share by natural means.

They don't set the prices, the developers / publishers do, which is why you often see them being the same price as retail copies. Valve's games are usually half price for me. :s

Aye it's a joke, Activision want ?40 for MW2! ?14 more than what I paid for L4D2!

Steam is deserving of it's position though, if I ever want to buy a PC game I always look at steam before going in to shops.

New game prices are terrible but it is the publishers/developers setting prices.

They do the same for retail, but the difference in retail is a lot of shops eat the profit/make a loss to attract buyers into the store. When it comes to online shops, they'll cut their profits lower because they don't have to pay as many staff/costs related to running a store. That creates the ridiculous prices we sometimes see.

On Steam Valve just leave it up to the publishers, Valve aren't buying in thousands of copies of stock, there is no stock, just a virtual copy on a server somewhere being accessed. Some bandwidth costs, but they are low.

Unfortunately for us that means these service providers don't really have a massive drive to try and gain your business for every single release. They tend to make most of their business out of their sales/bundles/deals. What they make from new releases will mostly come from the loyal customers, or those too lazy to wait on a physical copy.

steam is good unless you get this mess like modern warfare 2 and activision and steam charging full retail shelf price if not more when in theory the point of digital distribution is to lower costs by removing the need to make physical copies and sell off the game. :s

I freakin love STEAM.

Not having to keep up with hard media, etc. is a god-send. I load it up and it reminds me of the games I own. And if I get nostalgic for an old game I bought, I'm only a download away from playing it again.

PLUS, I can see what my friends are playing. If it's a multi-player game, I can jump right in and say hello. Pretty freakin sweet service, if you ask me.

My ONLY complaint about digital downloads is when the price is the same for store-bought versions. There's no shipping issues or media (disks, manuals, etc) costs associated so I hate paying them anyhow. STEAM, however, has been pretty good about running deals on games.

Steam is great, but their prices for third party, non valve games are not. I purchased a copy of F.E.A.R 2 Project Origin from HMV for ?9.99, a full copy that actually registers to your steam account anyway. The game is ?24.99 on steam, which is just crazy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!