Stardock: Steam Has 70% Of PC Download Market


Recommended Posts

Steam is great, but their prices for third party, non valve games are not. I purchased a copy of F.E.A.R 2 Project Origin from HMV for ?9.99, a full copy that actually registers to your steam account anyway. The game is ?24.99 on steam, which is just crazy

Just the same, GTAIV is up at full price I think on Steam, while only $20 at Target (retail store for those not familiar).

Honestly, some retailers will always have certain games priced lower. This is why I really suggest people to at least be smart consumers and shop around before deciding to pick up a game or anything for that matter. Personally, I like the convenience of Steam and don't mind if something is only $5 higher than somewhere else, though usually, I only purchase what's on sale on Steam and because of that, it's generally cheaper than anywhere else anyway:):)

Just wait until Battle.Net 2.0 comes out with a downloader and then Activision jumps all over it. I can see it now....

Ya know, that's something I really hadn't considered. While Blizzard seems intent on having it as a system fotheiri> games, I could easily see Activision wanting to jump on board with their games and services."Buy the latest Call of Duty, and get this sweet CoD soldier vanity pet in game!!!"i>

While we have our doubts that Stardock's Impulse service is at #2...

+1

Really? I did not know this, I thought they had to price them high because Steam takes a chunk of the profits? I maybe wrong, don't really know much about it if I can be honest.

That was the original plan for Steam, developers would only have publishers for the retail part and then they'd sell it online themselves and make a heap more money out of it. Seems like publishers didn't like that idea too much. :p

Most people don't understand how pricing works for retail and DD outlets. You can't compare what a retail store does and another outlet. A games retailer can sell the game for X amount of dollars for a variety of reasons, and it doesn't affect the prices of any other retailer.

Now are you saying this because you feel its true? or do you have to twist it to make them looks less legit, since you owe something to Stardock for buying part of your forum?

It's a pretty well known fact.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!