Recommended Posts

^ thank you for that command. i need to turn off shadows badly on my macbook (poor 320m was hating life...)

i will say this though, i am getting tired nowadays of paying to be a beta tester because this is what this feels like, a beta. bc2 did when it launched, gran tursimo etc etc

edit: config tool definitely helps!

We got that update as well but there was no notes on what it actually was. I'm guessing it's just adding a few more files needed for the decrypt process. This was before the game was actually unlocked, that is.

You know what I don't get is... this is an opengl game right? Why do we still have to install that stupid dx redistributable the first time we launch the game?

So I just checked out the PC version.

I thought it was off to a very promising start. For whatever reason this is literally the first game since Bad Company 2 actually that when I installed it, it auto detected my default resolution and seemed to set most of the graphics settings accordingly for my setup. It then launches right into the initial character creation, and I could not help but be impressed with how good the characters looked and what a cool visual style they have.

And when I clicked "Done" on my initial character creation, that was officially the last time I experienced anything positive from the game.

It is literally the most floaty controls I think I have ever experienced on a PC FPS. It is amazing to me how absolutely horrible they feel. And I spent a good 5-10 minutes adjusting them, and nothing changed how untight they felt.

Not only that, but according to both FRAPS then EVGA Precision as I had to double check, I was getting no less then 75 frames per second, and the game literally felt like it was running at 15 FPS. Like I was dumbfounded by how not smooth it felt for getting such a relatively high frame rate. I even went ahead and turned some Advanced graphics settings off completely, and it made zero difference except for a slight bump in FPS. The controls still felt as if I was underwater.

I also literally checked 5 times to make sure that somehow the default 1920 x 1080 resolution had not somehow been changed, as everything just seemed abnormally large. I know the game has an almost comic vibe to it, but it was actually downright silly how bad the whole visual style looks. Everything was way bigger then it needs to be.

The weapons felt like BB Guns at best. I felt as if there was zero power behind shooting them whatsoever. I realize I was on the default starter weapons, and the whole point of the game is to rank up your weapons, but even with that in mind, they just felt, in keeping with everything else I experienced, comical and silly.

Finally, there is just the overall fact that despite there knock at the consoles with the whole intro movie message, it really felt like a console port to me.

The sad part about all of the above, was it is a game I could see myself getting into from a game-play perspective. Very reminiscent of Enemy Territory with the objectives and how they go down. It is just the game-play was so poor I simply just will not be able to make myself overlook all of the other issues.

It is a shame really. Seems like it had some potential. I will still check out the 360 version that comes from Gamefly, as I hate to say this since I am no doubt a proponent of and prefer to play my FPS's on the PC, but from what I just experienced, I have a sneaky suspicion it will run better on the consoles.

Truth is I have been skeptical of this game for a long time now, way back in this thread I commented about the fact that I just was not sold on it, and it seems as if, at least for once, my intuition was spot on. It is a game I will perhaps revisit at the end of the year Steam Christmas sale, as maybe then they will have ironed out all of the issues, but I am not holding my breath, as it just seems as if the core game itself is fundamentally flawed.

Did you turn off vsync? I had to pull a move from Dead Space and enable vysnc through the nvidia control panel and disable it in game. That seemed to help with the floaty feel a bit.

Though according to SD there is no mouse smoothing or acceleration or anything at all in this game but that is very obviously incorrect. They even have cvars to do just those things.

larry another thing that could be happening is that on the steam forums and SD forums a crap ton of people are reporting that SLI isn't working either on this game, so that could be a culprit to your troubles. I never got the floaty feeling with the controls, when it's not lagging the game actually feels really smooth.

Just checked my D2D UK account and my Brink Product Key has magically disappeared from their site. Not impressed, thank god I got it when I did.

My CD key has never appeared even though the option is there to download. The option to download Spanish etc versions appeared suddenly but no key :x

Sent in a support ticket 24hrs ago and only just got an automated reply ;/

@DirtyLarry: A lot of people are reporting the same thing. They get 100-200 FPS but the game still feels laggy and unsmooth.

Did you turn off vsync? I had to pull a move from Dead Space and enable vysnc through the nvidia control panel and disable it in game. That seemed to help with the floaty feel a bit.

Though according to SD there is no mouse smoothing or acceleration or anything at all in this game but that is very obviously incorrect. They even have cvars to do just those things.

There is no game mouse accleration at all. That's according to the devs. The game uses 'raw_input'. So any mouse accleration has to come from Windows.

Did you turn off vsync? I had to pull a move from Dead Space and enable vysnc through the nvidia control panel and disable it in game. That seemed to help with the floaty feel a bit.

Though according to SD there is no mouse smoothing or acceleration or anything at all in this game but that is very obviously incorrect. They even have cvars to do just those things.

Yep, had vSync on and off. Tried both, seems to have made no difference.

larry another thing that could be happening is that on the steam forums and SD forums a crap ton of people are reporting that SLI isn't working either on this game, so that could be a culprit to your troubles. I never got the floaty feeling with the controls, when it's not lagging the game actually feels really smooth.

Could be SLi, usually though when SLi does not work, it just means a low frame rate. According to EVGA precision, SLi was enabled, but it just could be the game does not like SLi at all. At this point I am hoping that is the case, as it at least would make sense why it performed so dismal.

@DirtyLarry: A lot of people are reporting the same thing. They get 100-200 FPS but the game still feels laggy and unsmooth.

Good to know I am not the only one. So either most of us have SLi and it is that, or it is just the game is broken and needs to be fixed.

Try playing multiplayer. I've read that playing the single player can cause problems because the listen server is limited to 30fps.

Interesting.

To top off what DL mentioned, the objectives unbalance the game by sheer manpower and its impossible to break through your opponents stronghold, It just created an atmosphere where your hard work is punished(low experience pts earned) and in some cases low cooperation is added experience (note I don't count handing revives and ammunition packs as experience, heck thats practically how you earn most of them to begin with just huddle with your crew and keep throwing them out, and I noticed most of the time no one really runs out of ammo for an inconvient ammount of time its like these packs are being meant to be given away from the get go)

Overall I was suckered by the marketing behind this game, the artwork quality was that of a AAAA title but sadly I'm this child for being deceived of my $50 off steam.

Also one big fuss about this title is that I was under the impression the campaign was seperate from the MP but they're exactly the same thing. The gameplay isn't really impressive but its repetitive in a bad way.

I will probably go as to say this was the worst game I ever purchased for myself.

To top off what DL mentioned, the objectives unbalance the game by sheer manpower and its impossible to break through your opponents stronghold, It just created an atmosphere where your hard work is punished(low experience pts earned) and in some cases low cooperation is added experience (note I don't count handing revives and ammunition packs as experience, heck thats practically how you earn most of them to begin with just huddle with your crew and keep throwing them out, and I noticed most of the time no one really runs out of ammo for an inconvient ammount of time its like these packs are being meant to be given away from the get go)

Overall I was suckered by the marketing behind this game, the artwork quality was that of a AAAA title but sadly I'm this child for being deceived of my $50 off steam.

Also one big fuss about this title is that I was under the impression the campaign was seperate from the MP but they're exactly the same thing. The gameplay isn't really impressive but its repetitive in a bad way.

I will probably go as to say this was the worst game I ever purchased for myself.

All the bad press that the game is getting, I sort of saw it coming. Glad I waited for confirmation... now to save up for LA Noire :)

This game is stupid and not worth full price, it's Killzone 3 with retard bots for teammates and crappy character models and dialogue. I stopped playing at day 8 cause the damn bots on my team were too retarded to do anything right and the enemy bots are smarter lol i guess, which makes the game very frustrating when you have to repeat the same crap over again for an hour and then get nowhere. :x Brink = D

This game is stupid and not worth full price, it's Killzone 3 with retard bots for teammates and crappy character models and dialogue. I stopped playing at day 8 cause the damn bots on my team were too retarded to do anything right and the enemy bots are smarter lol i guess, which makes the game very frustrating when you have to repeat the same crap over again for an hour and then get nowhere. :x Brink = D

it's an MP based game so you gotta play it online

whenever that decides to work...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!