Recommended Posts

To top off what DL mentioned, the objectives unbalance the game by sheer manpower and its impossible to break through your opponents stronghold, It just created an atmosphere where your hard work is punished(low experience pts earned) and in some cases low cooperation is added experience (note I don't count handing revives and ammunition packs as experience, heck thats practically how you earn most of them to begin with just huddle with your crew and keep throwing them out, and I noticed most of the time no one really runs out of ammo for an inconvient ammount of time its like these packs are being meant to be given away from the get go)

Overall I was suckered by the marketing behind this game, the artwork quality was that of a AAAA title but sadly I'm this child for being deceived of my $50 off steam.

Also one big fuss about this title is that I was under the impression the campaign was seperate from the MP but they're exactly the same thing. The gameplay isn't really impressive but its repetitive in a bad way.

I will probably go as to say this was the worst game I ever purchased for myself.

No offence to yourself but this isn't a CoD clone. It's team based objective gameplay. You can't go solo and expect to when. You NEED to work together to get another. And nothing is impossible, teamwork can overcome anything.

This game isn't about getting the best KDR or most kill streaks. It is about winning the match, playing your part and getting the objectives.

This review pretty much sums up how I feel about this game:-

Is it true that their highly marketed unique single-player campaign is nothing more than multiplayer maps with bots?
I expected SP to crap, I don't want a stellar SP experience from this game. I want a unique MP experience from this game, which I know I will get.

As for the ATi card issues, normally at this point I would give up hope. But having played a Splash Damage game before (ET:QW) they support the games really well and their devs read and reply to their own forums. ET:QW got plenty of devotion and patches from SD. I expect Brink to get even better treatment, so I have complete faith that the ATi issues will be resolved shortly.

No offence to yourself but this isn't a CoD clone. It's team based objective gameplay. You can't go solo and expect to when. You NEED to work together to get another. And nothing is impossible, teamwork can overcome anything.

No offense, but I think most people posting on this thread are very familiar with objectives-based gameplay and Enemy Territory.

I myself have yet to play this game but based on all of the reviews (granted all of the review copies given out by SD is the 360 version) all seem to echo the same complaints in this thread. Here are some from the Giant Bomb review:

The weapons are incredibly underwhelming. Part of this is due to the sound design, which doesn't give anything an appropriate punch when it's fired. But the weapon damage feels weak and the bullet spray makes a lot of the non-scoped weapons feel imprecise and generally ineffective.
A lot of time in each map is spent running back to the battle, as the game lacks any sort of forward spawn capability.
Brink's stylized look is pretty cool, but the whole thing feels like a bust. The minute-to-minute action just isn't interesting enough to make the game's eight maps worth replaying for a serious length of time, which makes a lot of this come down to a basic value proposition. It feels like a downloadable game's worth of content that's been fleshed out a little by some slightly higher production values.
No offense, but I think most people posting on this thread are very familiar with objectives-based gameplay and Enemy Territory.
Not from some of the replies I am reading. Seems like most people just want to kill kill kill and not play the game.
I myself have yet to play this game but based on all of the reviews (granted all of the review copies given out by SD is the 360 version) all seem to echo the same complaints in this thread. Here are some from the Giant Bomb review.
And for every bad review there are a couple of good reviews.

The main reason I am so hesitant to want to even think about purchasing this is the recent release of a bunch of good shooters these past few months. Killzone 3, Socom 4, Crysis 2, Duke Nukem Forever, ( I just bought Black Ops :p ), and that is just the shooters. There is then Infamous 2, LA Noire, Mortal Kombat, Portal 2, and some others that rank up higher on my "want to buy" list.....

I'm a little hesitant in buying the game now. At first, I was going to get the PC version but my friends showed some interest in the X360 version so I decided to go for that. Now, they're not interested in it anymore which brings me back to the PC version. Unfortunately, I've been reading a lot of bad experiences from users with ATI video cards (which I happen to have). With that said, I'm going to hold off from buying the game until those issues are resolved.

I'm a little hesitant in buying the game now. At first, I was going to get the PC version but my friends showed some interest in the X360 version so I decided to go for that. Now, they're not interested in it anymore which brings me back to the PC version. Unfortunately, I've been reading a lot of bad experiences from users with ATI video cards (which I happen to have). With that said, I'm going to hold off from buying the game until those issues are resolved.

If I remember you and I had almost the same build, still using the 4870? I don't have HUGE issues. Other than minor graphical errors that I can ignore.

I'm a little hesitant in buying the game now. At first, I was going to get the PC version but my friends showed some interest in the X360 version so I decided to go for that. Now, they're not interested in it anymore which brings me back to the PC version. Unfortunately, I've been reading a lot of bad experiences from users with ATI video cards (which I happen to have). With that said, I'm going to hold off from buying the game until those issues are resolved.

No issues on my 6870, can't say about other cards/systems.

I like shooters but I've barely bought any of them recently. Aliens? Zombies? Whee. Portal? Meh...give me DX10/11 support and we'll talk. Call of Duty games? Overpriced for single player gamers.

Monolith makes the stuff I love, and I don't even know what they're doing right now. Definately want F.E.A.R. 3 though.

Thankfully that bug never affected me or else I would have stopped playing this game right then and there.

Also, they need NEED NEED to fix performance issues with this game. Like other people have been saying, my in-game FPS says 60 (with vsync) and over 150 (without vsync) but the game feels like it's going 20fps. Terrible optimization and feels like a crappy console port.

Other than that, I have only experienced a few multiplayer matches that were FUN - the ones I have tried today were so laggy I could not stand it so I quit.

SD & Bethesda need to get their crap together.

Ended up talking to a guy at Gamestop and I made up my mind to pick up Portal 2 instead. I may pick this up for computer some time down the road when it's on the bargain bin, but I can't justify paying 60 for a 360 game that will most likely get very few patches. Plus portal 2 was on sale for PC so i got it for a whopping 29.99 - great deal!

Ended up talking to a guy at Gamestop and I made up my mind to pick up Portal 2 instead. I may pick this up for computer some time down the road when it's on the bargain bin, but I can't justify paying 60 for a 360 game that will most likely get very few patches. Plus portal 2 was on sale for PC so i got it for a whopping 29.99 - great deal!

Portal 2 PCs been $30 on Amazon practically since launch...it already is in the bargain bin hah.

Which, actually, is about what I'd be willing to pay for it, where I spent 50 for Brink and don't mind at all.

Great game. Tired of playing against bots, but out of 20 matches, only 2 were playable. The others just blow. :(

Hope they fix the online lag issues sooner rather than later, or this is just going to be tossed aside and forgotten.

On another note. All achievements spare 4 done. :)

Great game. Tired of playing against bots, but out of 20 matches, only 2 were playable. The others just blow. :(

Hope they fix the online lag issues sooner rather than later, or this is just going to be tossed aside and forgotten.

On another note. All achievements spare 4 done. :)

My friend and I seem to keep getting other players in the game whenever we try to do a 2 player + AI game, which seems a little weird. Haven't had any lag issues since I connected directly to my 3g modem though.

Great game. Tired of playing against bots, but out of 20 matches, only 2 were playable. The others just blow. :(

Hope they fix the online lag issues sooner rather than later, or this is just going to be tossed aside and forgotten.

On another note. All achievements spare 4 done. :)

they'll fix it. just gotta have a little patience.

Ended up talking to a guy at Gamestop and I made up my mind to pick up Portal 2 instead. I may pick this up for computer some time down the road when it's on the bargain bin, but I can't justify paying 60 for a 360 game that will most likely get very few patches. Plus portal 2 was on sale for PC so i got it for a whopping 29.99 - great deal!

where do you get this from? the devs have a history of being good to their games in future (updates & patches) as someone has already said

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!