Recommended Posts

where do you get this from? the devs have a history of being good to their games in future (updates & patches) as someone has already said

If i recall the 360 allows limited patches free, if the devs want to release any beyond that they have to shell out money. I'll get the game eventually, but I would rather just buy it when it's $10-20 less, and all patched up, rather than dealing with all that now. Not to mention is has no lobbies so it will be hard to get all my friends into one team. I'm fine with Portal 2, Portal was one of my favorite games ever so I doubt i'll be disappointed.

If i recall the 360 allows limited patches free, if the devs want to release any beyond that they have to shell out money. I'll get the game eventually, but I would rather just buy it when it's $10-20 less, and all patched up, rather than dealing with all that now. Not to mention is has no lobbies so it will be hard to get all my friends into one team. I'm fine with Portal 2, Portal was one of my favorite games ever so I doubt i'll be disappointed.

kk, i advise you get portal 2 on pc, its been 'dumbed down' since portal 1, so if you want the really challenges PC for player made content (or you could rent portal 2 and complete the single player in a day or two and the co-op in a few hours?) (what i did)

Started creating my config for MP last night. Most of the cvars from ET:QW still work (Y)

Well i wont be playing on launch day, D2D UK still havent released keys. Its gonna take forever to install tomorrow cause servers are going to be hit by people trying to download/play as well.
Bummer dude. You from the UK or outside of it? I got an automated email (straight into my junk mail) from D2D UK letting me know my key was ready and it actually included the key in the email as well.

Bummer dude. You from the UK or outside of it? I got an automated email (straight into my junk mail) from D2D UK letting me know my key was ready and it actually included the key in the email as well.

Im from England and first thing i did was check my email.

Maybe you could share it when its done Singh? Ive preloaded my copy, just waiting for the game to unlock, stupid release dates.
Yeah sure mate, I'm still trying to find class specific binds and stuff but when I think it's near final I don't mind sharing it.
I'm from England and first thing I did was check my email.
Honestly, that isn't on man. I'd be livid if that happened to me. You can try steam://preload/22350/ or steam://install/22350/ to see if it'll work. And then when you do get your PK just use it on that. No idea if it'll work though mate.

I was on the brink (lol) of pre-ordering this yesterday along with LA Noire and DNF, but I stopped as soon as I read that reviews were lukewarm...

It's something I'll have to rent instead first. :[ Shame too, I was actually looking forward to it! Wouldn't want to throw near enough ?40 at something that might not be brilliant though.

If I remember you and I had almost the same build, still using the 4870? I don't have HUGE issues. Other than minor graphical errors that I can ignore.

Yes, I still use that video card. How's the performance on your system? I'd like to get at least 30 FPS (without any major drops during gun battles).

No issues on my 6870, can't say about other cards/systems.

I like shooters but I've barely bought any of them recently. Aliens? Zombies? Whee. Portal? Meh...give me DX10/11 support and we'll talk. Call of Duty games? Overpriced for single player gamers.

Monolith makes the stuff I love, and I don't even know what they're doing right now. Definately want F.E.A.R. 3 though.

Ah, I see. I'm guessing you're using the latest Catalyst drivers with the hotfix for Brink.

Yeah sure mate, I'm still trying to find class specific binds and stuff but when I think it's near final I don't mind sharing it.

Honestly, that isn't on man. I'd be livid if that happened to me. You can try steam://preload/22350/ or steam://install/22350/ to see if it'll work. And then when you do get your PK just use it on that. No idea if it'll work though mate.

Didnt work thanks anyway.

Yes, I still use that video card. How's the performance on your system? I'd like to get at least 30 FPS (without any major drops during gun battles).

Ah, I see. I'm guessing you're using the latest Catalyst drivers with the hotfix for Brink.

from what i read their are no real issues with the 6xxx cards, just the 5xxx and below.

Damn i have a 5770 :s, Guess i will hve to see when it is released here in the UK.

yeah i just upgraded from that card... it wasn't pretty.

also another issue. the voices in the cut scene and loading screen come out of my rear speakers... should definitely be coming out of the center channel.

is no one else getting random crashes?

kk, i advise you get portal 2 on pc, its been 'dumbed down' since portal 1, so if you want the really challenges PC for player made content (or you could rent portal 2 and complete the single player in a day or two and the co-op in a few hours?) (what i did)

I tend to get all Valve games on the PC now adays. I originally had the Orange Box for 360, but after the lack of updates for TF2 I moved over to the PC. I want to enjoy Portal for a long time, so i figured PC was the way to go. DLC, player made levels, etc.

First: I have no issues with the game. I'm running a Q6600 with 4 gigs of ram and a 8800GT. I'm running at 1680X1050. I have no idea what my framerate is, but I have not seen any slow downs at all, which is impressive.

Second: I really like this game. It's very fun to play. HOWEVER, the enemy AI is very good. They are smart. They cover the objectives well, do their objectives well, and are a royal pain. Your teammates, if you're playing solo, are mentally disabled. For instance, in the challenge where you have to complete 4 or 5 objectives, while switching classes, and you are the only one that can do the objectives, the opposing team does their job VERY well. Your teammates run around the map to random places. You usually get one helping out while the others bugger off.

Also, I think they made hacking a bit too much of a pain. I have no real issue with how long hacking takes. What I do have issue with is that a 99% complete hack can be COMPLETELY undone in 6 seconds. That hack would have taken a couple minutes if you are standing right AT the objective, which is usually impossible to do.

Overall though I'm very happy with this game.

Still no cd key from D2D :/

Same and they are ignoring my support request.

I think they blocked all Uk cdkeys because people were buying it internationally and they had issues redeeming it on Steam so everyone suffers because of International cheapskates.

Same and they are ignoring my support request.

My key also disappeared from their site but luckily I had all ready redeemed it on Steam before they pulled them. It's disgusting to be honest and it looks like many people won't get to play when its unlocked tonight. Disappointing from D2D and certainly makes me think twice before buying there again.

Im only on 512kbps connection at the minute because im out in the sticks away from home, its gonna take me 26 hours non stop downloading to get it and thats ignoring the fact the servers are going to be hammered tomorrow by all the D2D people that didnt get their key on time.

Can someone tell me if Brink is installed into the Common folder in Steamapps folder?

Im only on 512kbps connection at the minute because im out in the sticks away from home, its gonna take me 26 hours non stop downloading to get it and thats ignoring the fact the servers are going to be hammered tomorrow by all the D2D people that didnt get their key on time.

Can someone tell me if Brink is installed into the Common folder in Steamapps folder?

it does...

this game is seriously broken. random crashes ftmfw!

I actually bothered to change my outlook of the entire game surrounding +Singh400's perspective and this game actually works with people you know. I really went with a cod type of mentality and thats why I was bothered so much by it.

The lag I believe will get allot better over time, I don't really know if my cards performance is an issue at all when playing MP, I own a 6870 and I've experienced no crashes.

My Review (PC)

good

  • graphics
  • animation
  • art style
  • customization
  • weapons
  • no k/d on scoreboard
  • focus on teamplay
  • awesome gameplay
  • challenges are cool especially with coop
  • parkour crap (sliding though awesome while shot gunning the buddy behind him never gets old)

bad

  • sound in FMV and loading screen comes out of my rear channels on my 5.1 system
  • typical laggy first few days of online
  • i had to reinstall dx9 to get the sound work (the game uses opengl...)
  • why no female characters?
  • friendly bots are dumb as
  • weak story (has potential but it's like they didn't even care)
  • crappy single player does make it feel like a full game

ugly

  • ui reeks of console port
  • performance (i have to turn shadows, HBAO and motion off to play the game at a good frame rate)
  • random crashes
  • paying full price for this game. I am glad I only paid $37 because that's all it's worth. The SP is a joke, it's MP with bots. This is definitely not worth the full price of admission.

i got 12 hours of game play in. i love the game it just doesn't feel finished or they even used any sort of ATI cards in QA. this game isn't for the halo/CoD kiddies. to me it feels like a more evolved, adult tf2. Oh my specs are a q9550 @ 3.1ghz an oc'ed sapphire HD 5850 with 4gb of RAM. I shouldn't have any issues running this game maxed out at 1680x1050 (and according to their recommended specs i more then meet them). either way i love this game and will be playing it for a long time to come (my summer game) but they DESPERATELY need to fix the ATI issues and have more customization options for PC.

Right now I would give it a 7.8/10 and would be a 9 easily if it had a good SP, wasn't $60, better friendly AI and no tech issues.

----------------------------------------------

A lot of the reviews out there from the so called pros are retarded. they are clearly reviewing the 360 version of the game and mainly SP. That's why the scores are so bad. this game is getting too bad of a rap. it deserves some **** for it's shotty launch but not as much slag as it's getting. The Morgan Webb review just proved she's another dumb video game broad who is just an average skilled halo ######. The joystiq review was pretty the same thing. The best review i like so far is the Ars quick one because they are playing the PC version of the game and waited until after launch. this isn't one of those games that you can review before the game actually launches... you need to give it time as it's an MP focused game. Most dumb reviewers seem not to have figured that out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!