Recommended Posts

Yeh Ive been playing a lot of SP with the botss on hard. Its good and the MP Ive played its laggin but on some lower pop servers its been not bad. Also found if I turned ambiant oclusion off the game sprang into life a bit more. I.e no laggin on 70-80% of MP games I was in.

It is kinda naff that the whole SP isnt fleshed out more. Im 3/4 thru both campaigns now and done all challenges.

I,ll sa this about the marketing. The got it wrong way wrong but in some respects the vagueness has obv left to the intrepetation weve all come to, dunno if this was hyping it in a way that didnt actuall fully explain the concept or what but, if we were gonna have a situation where every NPC in say a game like Crysis 2 (jus an example two v.diff games) it wouldnt of worked and the game weve got would of purely been a MP arm only. Reasons being Linear vs. Non-Linear game play and objectives. I.e imagine its a situation where the story or map requires a vast number of enemy players against 1-4 people. The game would need to balance in such a way that it would be possible for the non-enemy team to win. Whilst ofc being online. Then theres objectives. The ones we see at present fine for MP but kinda crap for SP. Why?

Well things like cutscenes and dynamic events such as map layouts changing or scripted events all needed for a SP map and objectives but not possible as soon as MP is there unless your doing some sort of phasing ala Wow style for every one involved. Some of this could of been done but in a way there just still two massively differently experiences when done right. But hey Im happy cause what we have is a decent little online shooter, thats unique and fun to play. Oh and an alternative to TF2 :)

If anyones on Steam playin add me :) Colicab

Posted this over in a thread at the official SD forums...

So having played extensively for a couple of days. Couple of observations:-

  • Hack objectives are way too hard. I played with a good circle of friends who understand team play and supporting roles. The solution is either make it quicker to hack, slow to reverse or introduce a fade on the hack if they haven?t touched it in x seconds/minutes.
  • Escort objectives are hit and miss too. I?d suggest making the hostages invisible to turrets or something like that. It needs tweaking. Again this type of objective is stacked in the defenders favour.
  • SMART is only really fun playing as light. I understand the whole body type thing, but come on as medium I should be able to do most of the SMART moves, not just a limited selection
  • Guns! There is not enough guns, or should I say variation in gun type. It seems like the gun selection is half hearted, and someone lost interest half way.
  • Get rid of the context sensitive objectives. It?s far too buggy for my liking. I have to stand directly infront of the god damn objective for the prompt to appear. No offence, but I?m not on a fricking console. FIX IT!
  • Following on from the above, on a plant objective. Try pulling away just as you are about to place your charge. Bugs galore.
  • Some of the maps needs to be looked at again. I don?t mind playing a challenging game. But some maps are either stacked heavily in defenders favour or vice versa.
  • Fix objective naming. Case in point. There is a level (sorry, haven?t learnt the names yet). Where you have to hack the safe to progress. If you are solider it?ll safe GUARD THE SAFE. Where as if you are Ops it?ll say HACK THE SAFE. The amount of times I?ve been chased by my own team because I?m doing the objective is hilarious. You guys need to look at the wording, and correct it.
  • Sounds bugs, I?m sure you know the deal. Fix it.
  • I should be able to change body type as well as change player at the command console.
  • Replace the objective circle/command console circle with something less obtrusive. Reeks of console UI. There?s a g_advancedHUD lets use that huh? ;)

That?s all I got for now, but I?m sure I?ll have more soon!

Posted this over in a thread at the official SD forums...

So having played extensively for a couple of days. Couple of observations:-

List

That?s all I got for now, but I?m sure I?ll have more soon!

I agree with all of that.

The map where you have to hack the air ventilation system as resistance is a joke. 2 entrances to the objective room which both can easily be guarded by the defending team. All they need is engineers with auto turrets on their team and 2 medics to toss out revives and the resistance can't make any progress. I've yet to see a team make it past that objective.

I've made it past that objective, but there's a later one in that mission that I haven't yet (as attacker.) The missile level is a pain in the ass to take though we've done it as Resistance.

All the guns have different upgrades so I like the variety now that I've unlocked more upgrades. I actually have a few preferred guns and a great machine pistol now.

For me this games movement is just waaaay too slow. For a game that is supposed to emphasize "freedom of movement" it feels very clunky, even with the light body type. I never really feel like I can strafe or dodge out of the way quick enough.

I also hate how when you buff someone that the game takes over your mouse movement and locks on to them. Really annoying. I saw an interview with a developer that said they never take control away from you, but that's not exactly true. While you can cancel it at any time, it's still annoying to have your mouse move on it's own. The same is true for the parkour stuff. I feel like it's just a series of canned animations and it feels very ridged and restricted. I think it would have been better to have the player be in control at all times. Mirrors edge done that kind of thing a lot better.

Most of the guns seem similar to me and none of them are very accurate. Most of the time I can just spray them and get kills easily without needed to aim very much at all.

I just feel like the whole game is dulled down from what it could have been. They were obviously focusing on making an easy game for console players rather than on a game with depth.

I've made it past that objective, but there's a later one in that mission that I haven't yet (as attacker.) The missile level is a pain in the ass to take though we've done it as Resistance.

All the guns have different upgrades so I like the variety now that I've unlocked more upgrades. I actually have a few preferred guns and a great machine pistol now.

I've made it past that objective. My point was that you could have an average team on attack vs a noob team on defence. And the defence wouldn't have to do much to win at all. That map in particular is built for defence. Worse even, is if you have teams of equal skill. The defence can push up, and just hold you in your spawn. Much like Container City.
For me this games movement is just waaaay too slow. For a game that is supposed to emphasize "freedom of movement" it feels very clunky, even with the light body type. I never really feel like I can strafe or dodge out of the way quick enough.
Agreed, I felt the same way. With a medium body type, the movement is really clunkly. SMART only really works with light body type. Also I hate how you aren't in complete control of your movement. It's like it's all chained together.
I also hate how when you buff someone that the game takes over your mouse movement and locks on to them. Really annoying. I saw an interview with a developer that said they never take control away from you, but that's not exactly true. While you can cancel it at any time, it's still annoying to have your mouse move on it's own. The same is true for the parkour stuff. I feel like it's just a series of canned animations and it feels very ridged and restricted. I think it would have been better to have the player be in control at all times. Mirrors edge done that kind of thing a lot better.
You aren't the only one complaining about this. It's a big thing at the SD forums. I hate it too.
Most of the guns seem similar to me and none of them are very accurate. Most of the time I can just spray them and get kills easily without needed to aim very much at all.
Agreed. The guns are too similar, and most of them are quite weak. They are accurate, but they need to modify the hitboxes and add in hit sound feedback. Both for body and head.
I just feel like the whole game is dulled down from what it could have been. They were obviously focusing on making an easy game for console players rather than on a game with depth.
Again, you aren't alone in thinking this. I mean look at the objective wheel - nuff said.

What specifically?

Seems ok to me - the medics are fairly decent at reviving me.

My only issue is the enemy AI is tough until about 60 seconds left on the timer then they seem to just give up :/

they don't know how to support or do the objectives. like you said, them reviving you is the only good side about them.

they don't know how to support or do the objectives. like you said, them reviving you is the only good side about them.

They're better since the patch. I used to get to an objective and try to defend it while hacking it all by myself when bots are involved, now I can expect a few of em to come make sure I stay alive.

They're better since the patch. I used to get to an objective and try to defend it while hacking it all by myself when bots are involved, now I can expect a few of em to come make sure I stay alive.

i wish that was the case for me. i can't get by the objective challenges cause the idiots just ran the opposite direction of the objective, no supporting me at all and i get shot up in seconds. it's honestly retardedly. they go after the opposition team directly, not strategically based on what the objective is...

Update incoming early next week - Source

Xbox 360

We?ve been hard at work investigating the lag issues some players of the Xbox 360 version of Brink have reported. We?ve now completed modifications to improve network performance and will be rolling these out in a title update for the game.

This title update is also going to fix an isolated freezing issue reported by some German players who should no longer experience that problem once the update has been installed.

PC

This update contains a host of fixes and improvements including the following:

We?ve identified the cause of sound dropping out on certain maps when playing networked games for a prolonged amount of time. This will no longer occur.

Graphical performance has been improved, especially when using Ambient Occlusion. We?ve worked closely with both AMD and NVIDIA, and you should see performance and stability improvements in future driver revisions from both parties.

The server browser is tweaked in this update, as well; among other things, a new filter allows you to display only servers with a certain number of players on them, and full servers will no longer be filtered out completely.

There are some smaller fixes for minor issues including your character?s voice occasionally resetting when deleting another character, and a memory leak when alt-tabbing out of the game.

Finally, the dedicated server is set to get an update at the same time as the main game, which will result in improved CPU performance. We?ve protected certain cvars that previously allowed server admins to accidentally break objectives involving NPCs.

The full changelog will be released alongside the update, so keep an eye out for that.

PlayStation 3

With PSN back online, we?re able to resume multiplayer testing on the PlayStation 3. We?re preparing to bring the changes in the upcoming Xbox 360 title update to the PlayStation 3 version of Brink quickly and we expect to have it out next week. Stay tuned!

Brink Updated

General:

? Fixed sound dropping out when playing networked games

? Improved graphical performance, especially when using Ambient Occlusion

? Fixed voice packs being reset to default when you delete another character

? Removed ability to use certain cheat protected commands in challenges

? Fixed memory leak/crash when alt-tabbed out

User Interface:

? Full servers are no longer filtered out of the browser

? Added support for entering a range of numbers (i.e. 10-12) in server filters

? Reduced font size in the server browser

? Exiting Head customization returns to the correct menu

? Fixed being unable to bind KP_Enter in the UI

? Increased font size of in-game text chat

? ?Enter? now closes text chat prompt if empty

? Fixed challenge in menu flashing even after completion

Dedicated Servers:

? Improved dedicated server CPU performance

? Fixed NPC not spawning for escort objectives online on servers using unsupported cvars

didn't really improve performance for me but fixed a lot of graphical glitches. if i turn on HBAO it aboslutely murders my performance still though.

Played my first few pro-scrims recently (one a while back, and one tonight before the patch) and I got absolutely raped both times (same clan from Germany) in all bodily orifices you can think of. It was a humbling experience. I can pretty much hold my own on pubs (and own a fair few of them). But playing pro-scrims is just a different ball game altogether. What was I thinking signing up to ESL :\ I?m gonna stick at it, practice every day. There?s always folks on IRC wanting a scrim.

Dead game already?

that's what happens when you have retard developpers who release a beta product at best as a retail release. game still needs a lot of work imo. still isn't running the greatest for me. I'm waiting for new ATI drivers before i jump back in. i haven't regretted buying a game in a long time until this one...

still have garbled text and ****ty fps. even with the hotfix 11.5b drivers

4,688 29,453 Football Manager 2011

3,534 4,990 Portal 2

3,414 6,658 Battlefield: Bad Company 2

3,208 7,866 Total War SHOGUN 2

3,106 5,511 Fallout New Vegas

3,046 5,866 The Witcher 2

2,949 4,795 RIFT

2,153 6,375 Empire: Total War

2,000 4,776 Garry's Mod

1,710 5,525 Call of Duty Black Ops

1,492 4,032 Mount&Blade: Warband

1,414 3,742 Fable 3

1,333 2,026 Killing Floor

1,249 3,276 Dawn of War II - Retribution

1,221 5,134 BRINK

1,178 1,686 Borderlands

958 3,300 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

940 1,552 Mass Effect 2

902 1,547 EVE Online

886 5,235 Condition Zero

856 3,996 Day of Defeat: Source

826 2,915 Napoleon: Total War

810 2,021 Left 4 Dead

800 1,284 Plants vs. Zombies

747 1,402 The Witcher: Enhanced Edition

654 1,232 Half-Life 2

steam stats. left is current players, right is peak for the day. this game is dieing fast.

also, spot on review of the game. more i play it, the more everything he says right

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!