Recommended Posts

Yeah, throughout the entire time I spent with this game, I could never get over just how odd the movement felt, how clumsy the parkour actions were, how insubstantial the guns felt, and how utterly unbalanced the game was (some maps were better than others, to be fair). It was so jarring moving back to Bad Company 2 after playing Brink. Like finally walking on land again after treading miles through mud.

In any case, I spent $36 on Brink, and I got about eight hours of entertainment out of it, so it's hard to sit here and feel like I got cheated. I can name a few single player games that have given me less entertainment for a full $60. However, as a person who spent an entire summer playing Wolf:ET, it fell short of my expectations by a country mile.

for those who still care...

We?re excited to announce the final release date for Brink: Agents of Change. The content will be available this coming Wednesday, August 3rd, on Xbox LIVE, PlayStation Network, and Steam. As long as you download Agents of Change during the first two weeks it becomes available, you?ll always be able to play it for FREE.

Learn more at Bethesda Blog

http://bethblog.com/index.?php/2011/07/29/brink-title?-update-today-dlc-next-wee?k/

Yeah, throughout the entire time I spent with this game, I could never get over just how odd the movement felt, how clumsy the parkour actions were, how insubstantial the guns felt, and how utterly unbalanced the game was (some maps were better than others, to be fair). It was so jarring moving back to Bad Company 2 after playing Brink. Like finally walking on land again after treading miles through mud.

In any case, I spent $36 on Brink, and I got about eight hours of entertainment out of it, so it's hard to sit here and feel like I got cheated. I can name a few single player games that have given me less entertainment for a full $60. However, as a person who spent an entire summer playing Wolf:ET, it fell short of my expectations by a country mile.

Honestly that does not even begin to cover my disappointment. Movement is key for me, I need to be able to move correctly. SMART sounded like a fantastic idea in reality it failed. Sure it was cool to auto hop over stuff. But during the SMART action you had no control over your character. Compare that to movement in ETQW - I had control over ALL my movement. Once I initiated the SMART action that's it. I was "on the rails" for x seconds.
Can't say I'm not surprised. Saw this as a flop a mile away... ;)
I placed a lot of faith in this game. I really thought it would be a big hit. Me and all my friends from ET:QW.
For those who still care...
Honestly, far too little, too late. It's just not worth it any more. This DLC was pushed back so many times people have lost interest in the game completely. And making it for free doesn't even begin to make up for the disappointment the PC gaming community feels.

I have actually decided to keep it. :laugh:

I made a thread on the official Brink forums, and basically some people there talked me into giving it a chance since it was only $20. Especially since I am more or less in time for the DLC, who knows, maybe it will grow on me.

Stranger things have happened. If not, it is not the end of the world. Again, really just looking for something to play on the PC until Deus Ex.

I have actually decided to keep it. :laugh:

I made a thread on the official Brink forums, and basically some people there talked me into giving it a chance since it was only $20. Especially since I am more or less in time for the DLC, who knows, maybe it will grow on me.

Stranger things have happened. If not, it is not the end of the world. Again, really just looking for something to play on the PC until Deus Ex.

The " official Brink forum" is probably full of fanboys :) I wouldn't ask them if they liked the game or not ...

Anyone who's stil playing it on pc with AMD cards - has the performance improved from what it was when it was released?

last i checked it was pretty good, but some spots on certain maps it would drop hard for no real reason.

The " official Brink forum" is probably full of fanboys :) I wouldn't ask them if they liked the game or not ...

this

The " official Brink forum" is probably full of fanboys :) I wouldn't ask them if they liked the game or not ...

:rolleyes: Obviously it is full of fanboys, that is why I asked as that is more than likely the people STILL playing it. I was not asking them on an opinion based, I was asking them from a player base.

And actually you should give the human race a bit more credit, there are actually some decent people out there, and almost half of them actually said DO NOT keep it.

And FTR, I have played the game, I had a copy if you will, just never played MP, so I know what to expect from that regard, it has always been more about if I can find servers, etc., which almost every single person on the Brink forums said that would be tough, but it was an option.

Are you playing on PC ? Because you can, at any time, see all the BRINK servers directly from STEAM, without owning the game.

Example (took by myself, 2min ago) :

5e0c6364fabc44d90f204e6978c1909f38318cb5.png

edit : WORST FORUM EVER! Grab the picture link here : http://hfr-rehost.net/http://self/pic/5e0c6364fabc44d90f204e6978c1909f38318cb5.png

Are you playing on PC ? Because you can, at any time, see all the BRINK servers directly from STEAM, without owning the game.

Example (took by myself, 2min ago) :

5e0c6364fabc44d90f204e6978c1909f38318cb5.png

edit : WORST FORUM EVER! Grab the picture link here : http://hfr-rehost.ne...09f38318cb5.png

How exactly does one check servers for any game through Steam? I have honestly never done so and that is definitely a cool feature and I would have for no doubt checked out prior to making any threads or questions if I knew about it.

But it does look like some people are playing the game here and there, even though it is also my understanding a decent amount of those servers can be filled with bots, which I definitely am not crazy about that fact.

This really is just meant to amuse me until Dues Ex. One without a doubt has to step back and think to themselves why would a game that only came out a few months ago already be selling for $20, and the obvious answer is because it tanked and as such must not be very good, but honestly I have such low expectations based on this fact I might just wind up enjoying myself. And if not, there are worse things I could have spent my $20 on.

Open steam > view > servers > changes filter : pick brink, not empty, no pw.

Thanks. Will start utilizing this option more all around. Actually feel like I may have known about it and just completely forgotten one could do this.

I honestly like the game. It is not the best game in the world, FAR from it actually, but for $20, I feel like it was a good deal. I can see why people who purchased on release would be bitter though, no doubt. But especially the people who are playing it, all seem really pretty cool, very helpful, and I just really, really enjoy the fact teamwork is the biggest aspect of it. I have been top player in a few games I have played, and I hardly have any kills, just all about the teamwork. I dig it.

I honestly like the game. It is not the best game in the world, FAR from it actually, but for $20, I feel like it was a good deal. I can see why people who purchased on release would be bitter though, no doubt. But especially the people who are playing it, all seem really pretty cool, very helpful, and I just really, really enjoy the fact teamwork is the biggest aspect of it. I have been top player in a few games I have played, and I hardly have any kills, just all about the teamwork. I dig it.

The price doesn't really matter.

I'd rather pay $40 for a great game than 2 ****ty game like brink for $20.

And they cut the price for BRINK because the review were bad (among the sales), they are trying to save the sinking ship, nothing else.

The price doesn't really matter.

I'd rather pay $40 for a great game than 2 ****ty game like brink for $20.

And they cut the price for BRINK because the review were bad (among the sales), they are trying to save the sinking ship, nothing else.

Right, if you do not like the game, I agree, the price does not matter. But I happen to like the game in the state it is when I started playing it, which was just last week .So for me, the price does indeed matter, it was an added bonus if you will.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!