Recommended Posts

Uninstall DOESN'T work properly!!! :mad: How to I get rid of it now, cus when I uninstalled, it told me to restart FF then the thing is still there but the uninstall option has now gone!!!

I want rid of it please.

Thanks for the updates guys, great work (Y)

Not so keen on the fission line in 1.1, mainly because it doesn't match the colour of the theme colour you've selected, but also because for me anyway it's "off".

Starts about 5cm in from where around the actual URL bar starts and ends sooner than it.

Thanks for the updates guys, great work (Y)

Not so keen on the fission line in 1.1, mainly because it doesn't match the colour of the theme colour you've selected, but also because for me anyway it's "off".

Starts about 5cm in from where around the actual URL bar starts and ends sooner than it.

You could use Progress bars per tab via Tabberwocky:

post-22895-1262442916_thumb.jpg

Thanks for the updates guys, great work (Y)

Not so keen on the fission line in 1.1, mainly because it doesn't match the colour of the theme colour you've selected, but also because for me anyway it's "off".

Starts about 5cm in from where around the actual URL bar starts and ends sooner than it.

Yea I just took the one directly from Strata40 for now. We will have a styled one for 1.2.

You could use Progress bars per tab via Tabberwocky:

post-22895-1262442916_thumb.jpg

There's already tab bar progress lines in this theme ;)

Yea I just took the one directly from Strata40 for now. We will have a styled one for 1.2.

Okay understandable, glad to know it's not something on my end :)

That's the Fission progressline though not a per tabs progress line? unless there's an update I'm not aware of that enables this?

I have fission disabled for now and I get tab bar progress lines just fine (that also match theme colour I think).

The only thing I'd say about them is they might be a pixel too high, cut off tab bar activity indicator a bit (that's probably unavoidable though).

I have fission disabled for now and I get tab bar progress lines just fine (that also match theme colour I think).

The only thing I'd say about them is they might be a pixel too high, cut off tab bar activity indicator a bit (that's probably unavoidable though).

If you have stylish let me know if this fixes it.

 .tab-progress {
 margin-top: -3px !important;
 }

I tried TMP out with 3.5 and it was working correctly for me. Which features do you use in TMP? You might be able to replace it with this addon https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14439

I uninstalled TMP and installed Tabberwocky and session manager instead and everything is working now

Thanks

So sorry, I do have tab progress bar installed from Strata days! My bad :)

Is there any difference between installing tab progress bar or tabberwocky in looks or performance?

edit: Should just of looked myself, tab progress bar is much more basic, only 6kb, will save on memory usage and I doubt I need all the additions of tabberwocky.

If you have stylish let me know if this fixes it.

 .tab-progress {
  margin-top: -3px !important;
  }

I'll try giving that a whirl in a bit.

So sorry, I do have tab progress bar installed from Strata days! My bad :)

Is there any difference between installing tab progress bar or tabberwocky in looks or performance?

I'll try giving that a whirl in a bit.

I believe they are the same. Same author, its just tabberwocky has additional features.

This theme is excelent and works perfectly on my Laptop, but on my pc i am having an issue with the top bar where the file button and tabs should be, see pics for the problem.

With only 1 tab open the top bar looks like this.

1tabb.th.jpg

But with multiple tabs open the bar is fine.

multipletabs.th.jpg

And here is my Extensions

extensions.th.jpg

Firefox is V3.6B5

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!