Recommended Posts

Today 3:00pm Men's Play-offs Semifinals United States vs. Finland (On now!)

Tonight 9:30pm Men's Play-offs Semifinals Canada vs. Slovakia

Feb 27 10:00pm Men's Bronze Medal Game

Feb 28 3:00pm Men's Gold/Silver Game

EST

USA scores!

USA 1 - Finland 0

Not a huge hockey fan in general, but I have been keeping up with it in the Olympics.

Go USA, kick some bootay!

Same here but I will watch ANY sport that's gets to tournament/playoffs!!! :D

USA will at least win Silver unless Finland gets a Miracle comeback victory.... In Hockey like Soccer = VERY SLIM!!! :D

Too bad the refs were Canadian sided and didn't call the the penalties properly. Now there is an investigation by the Olympic committee about inappropriate behavior on the ice after the game, so the Canadian team might lose their medals.

Oh, I agree with the Russians too, Vancouver wasn't fit to host the Olympics.

go to the city, then talk ****. easy to judge something when you're not there and just seeing whatever you want on TV and internet. The olympics have been amazing so far.

my fins are getting raped :( poor koivu :(. i knew the states had a good team but WOW!

Too bad the refs were Canadian sided and didn't call the the penalties properly. Now there is an investigation by the Olympic committee about inappropriate behavior on the ice after the game, so the Canadian team might lose their medals.

Oh, I agree with the Russians too, Vancouver wasn't fit to host the Olympics.

1) Over drinking on the ice post-game? Come on now. If the refs were that biased, or if there was serious misconduct during the game, sure. But that's going a bit too far for post-game conduct IMO.

2) And why is that?

edit: so seeing from the posts up there, looks like it may come down to a Canada-USA rematch after all... IF we survive tonight.

Too bad the refs were Canadian sided and didn't call the the penalties properly. Now there is an investigation by the Olympic committee about inappropriate behavior on the ice after the game, so the Canadian team might lose their medals.

Oh, I agree with the Russians too, Vancouver wasn't fit to host the Olympics.

3 refs, 1 Canadian, 1 USA, 1 (i forgot, from Sweden or something).

Also no investigation http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/ioc-plans-a-letter-but-no-investigation-into-canadian-womens-hockey-celebration-85533632.html

As it should be. Although:

Marie-Philip Poulin, who scored both goals for Canada in the final, was shown on the ice with a can of beer in hand. Poulin doesn't turn 19, the legal drinking age in British Columbia, until next month. The drinking age in Alberta, where the Canadian team trains, and Poulin's native Quebec is 18.

Oops. :p (didn't know Alberta also has the legal age at 18)

Haha when you score 6-0 in 1st quarter you pretty much can score 0 for the rest of game to win the game! :D

really... quarter?

if we lose to the states next game im going to be completely embrassed we are losing to a country who doesn't even know the sport...

really... quarter?

if we lose to the states next game im going to be completely embrassed we are losing to a country who doesn't even know the sport...

Umm, America has more hockey teams than we do....

doesn't mean they know more or anything about hockey...

Is that why a Canadian team hasn't won the standley cup since 92-93? http://proicehockey.about.com/od/stanleycupbunker/a/stanley_cuplist.htm

Edit: was mentioned above :p

They certanly know how to play it, when was the last time a Canadian team won the stanley cup? :p

too bad most of the winning teams players and captains are all canadians

and other then like 6 american cities no one even watches the game. i mean in florida they litterally give tickets away for free. just because they are winning in the states, doesn't mean they know anything. new jresey can't even sell out in the playoffs. Most of the teams down there are run by canadians... but this is a different topic all together.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
    • I'm no Apple fan, and have never bought an Apple product for myself. But I'd argue that where you think Apple is behind regarding an OLED display, that the vast majority of people out there wouldn't even know or care for an OLED. Apple have struck the balance well to create a price point that works, and I hope that PC manufactures, and Microsoft take notice. I'd argue that Asus will struggle to compete with the Neo BECAUSE they put in a more expensive OLED that many people won't actually notice with its deeper blacks. Most people wouldn't care either that their screen is stuck at 60Hz! When I bought a 4k monitor (future proof and for the space), my laptop could only push that out at 30Hz, and it worked fine for my needs for 1.5 years! Heck, the average human eye can't see more than 90Hz in many situations!! So while they are trying to differentiate themselves, and it may well gain them a few customers, for the most part, I think they're missing the point of what the Neo is for.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!