Opera 10.50 RC for Windows Released


Recommended Posts

I wasn't an Opera fan before, but now with that development rate and direction it tops every other browser out there.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

For some reason it makes me a tad uneasy. Not necessarily saying that they won't pull it off with aplomb, but still...

Too bad Opera doesn't have Reload tab option when right-clicking on a tab :(

What does Create follower tab do when right-clicking on a tab? I don't get it :D

When you create a follower tab, any link you click in the original tab opens in the follower tab, even those that would originally open in the same tab.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

For some reason it makes me a tad uneasy. Not necessarily saying that they won't pull it off with aplomb, but still...

I am quite certain that this is just an exception (due to EU ballot screen) and Opera will go back to the usual trend of thoroughly testing each build from the next version.

When you create a follower tab, any link you click in the original tab opens in the follower tab, even those that would originally open in the same tab.

That and also the tab inherits properties such as Zoom level from the parent tab.

some sites still render without rounded corners

That's because the sites are using vendor/browser-specific CSS to do it. They need to remove the browser-specific prefix.

Too bad Opera doesn't have Reload tab option when right-clicking on a tab :(

Why not just click the Reload icon? Or you can right-click on the page itself.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

Excuse me, but have you seen the massive progress since the pre-alpha? Yes, the breakneck development speed is indeed something to be happy about. It's not just development, but it's stabilized increadibly quickly. They are clearly testing stuff properly, and whatever's left is quickly picked out when testing snapshots, and fixed shortly after.

I think should concentrate of a polishing Opera 10.5 rather than trying to take even more advantage of EU's generosity.

What do you think they are doing right now? They have uploaded builds with hundreds of fixes and polishing just these last few days. I find it odd that someone complains about polish when that's all they have been doing since the pre-alpha.

Excuse me, but have you seen the massive progress since the pre-alpha? Yes, the breakneck development speed is indeed something to be happy about. It's not just development, but it's stabilized increadibly quickly. They are clearly testing stuff properly, and whatever's left is quickly picked out when testing snapshots, and fixed shortly after.

Yep, that's what I meant, I also appreciate this speedy (and quality) development because it's not something you see a lot in a browser (take a look at how long does it take IE or Firefox developers to release a new stable version for example).

Speed of development doesn't have to be inversely proportional to polish of release IMO, especially in this crazy browsers wars.

What do you think they are doing right now? They have uploaded builds with hundreds of fixes and polishing just these last few days. I find it odd that someone complains about polish when that's all they have been doing since the pre-alpha.

Maybe it's because I've got used to the slightly longer development time of Firefox versions. I tried the first Beta of 10.5 and noticed a few weird things ,maybe it's better now, I'll install it this RC.

Maybe it's because I've got used to the slightly longer development time of Firefox versions. I tried the first Beta of 10.5 and noticed a few weird things ,maybe it's better now, I'll install it this RC.

Opera usually have much longer development cycles as well. The bailout screen have change that for 10.5. After the coming week the cycle will probably go down a bit. They will also focus on the Mac and Linux versions.

Opera lost me as a customer ever since they cried like little girls and complained to the EU that there browser wasn't popular enough. Before that I considered using it but now its only Firefox, Chrome and IE9 (when its released) for me.

In addition there just seems to be way too many bugs, almost every post is someone saying bug# still exists.

Opera lost me as a customer ever since they cried like little girls and complained to the EU that there browser wasn't popular enough.

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they filed an antitrust complaint against Microsoft?

Did Microsoft lose you as a customer when they filed an antitrust complaint against Google?

Did Mozilla lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Are you consistent, or is it just another knee-jerk reaction based on lack of knowledge of the subject matter?

Before that I considered using it but now its only Firefox, Chrome and IE9 (when its released) for me.

Oops, looks like there's some hypocrisy going on here! Apparently it's fine for Google and Microsoft to file false antitrust complaints (they were rejected), but when Opera files a perfectly reasonable complaint because of Microsoft's proven illegal activities, then that's bad all of a sudden!

Gotta love inconsistency, hypocrisy and double standards :D

In addition there just seems to be way too many bugs, almost every post is someone saying bug# still exists.

Welcome to the world of browser development. That's the way other browsers have it too.

Man 10.5 is coming along fast :)

EDIT: this build seems to have regressed a bit. I loved that they had moved the trash button on the tab bar all the way to the right in the last build and now its back in that weird spot before the window buttons :( And the lighter blue color for the tabs looks ugly.

The skin's not finished yet. There might be a final update to the skin...

The new tabs are okay except for the chunky shadow on the left-most tab.

Opera usually have much longer development cycles as well. The bailout screen have change that for 10.5. After the coming week the cycle will probably go down a bit. They will also focus on the Mac and Linux versions.

To top it off, they also split up their development teams, instead of having one large team working on the Windows, Mac and Unix/Linux builds all at once, they have a team working on the Windows builds, a team working on the Mac builds, etc. They are probably rushing to get 10.5 on Windows out the door due to the browser ballot screen, but they also split up their teams, so they can focus on getting a full Windows build out to please a larger majority of the market, then they can focus on the other builds to please the others. Like you said, once 10.5 for Windows releases, development on Windows is going to drop dramatically until the other OS releases catch up.

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they filed an antitrust complaint against Microsoft?

Did Microsoft lose you as a customer when they filed an antitrust complaint against Google?

Did Mozilla lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Are you consistent, or is it just another knee-jerk reaction based on lack of knowledge of the subject matter?

Oops, looks like there's some hypocrisy going on here! Apparently it's fine for Google and Microsoft to file false antitrust complaints (they were rejected), but when Opera files a perfectly reasonable complaint because of Microsoft's proven illegal activities, then that's bad all of a sudden!

Gotta love inconsistency, hypocrisy and double standards :D

Welcome to the world of browser development. That's the way other browsers have it too.

What Microsoft did wasn't illegal, bundling a browser with their operating system isn't a crime in any country. Opera, Mozilla or any other company should have no say in how another (more importantly a competitor) operates their business.

Btw I just tried the Opera browser and its really buggy I'm amazed. First it wouldn't import my bookmarks from Firefox no matter what I did, then it would render certain websites differently to how ever other browser does it. The built-in email program is a great idea which I looked forward to trying out but sadly it wouldn't render the email as HTML and kept showing the tags making it useless, also for some stupid reason the dates the emails were received were completely different so emails I got last year were showing up as being received only today. :wacko:

Opera does have a nice UI though but that simply isn't enough to get me to change from my existing browser(s).

Btw I just tried the Opera browser and its really buggy I'm amazed. First it wouldn't import my bookmarks from Firefox no matter what I did, then it would render certain websites differently to how ever other browser does it. The built-in email program is a great idea which I looked forward to trying out but sadly it wouldn't render the email as HTML and kept showing the tags making it useless, also for some stupid reason the dates the emails were received were completely different so emails I got last year were showing up as being received only today. :wacko:

Many sites use browser-specific code, so its not unusual for a website to look a bit different in one browser compared to another. The main thing is whether it looks rendered correctly or not, and even if it looks wrong, it could be browser-sniffing code designed for an older version of Opera, and the site simply hasn't updated it for the rendering improvements in 10.5. Odd about your email issues, HTML emails render fine for me.....and the dates have never shown up wrong either.

On it right now... Looks pretty... Renders slower than Chrome though on my PC. I dunno why it does... I mean, it's fast... but images render so slow and/or start off as a "X" first before loading. Looks bad when loading some heavy websites.

Other than that, it's pretty decent. I never liked Widgets, so I don't use it. I pretty much strip it down to just tabs and browser bar. It starts up slower than Chrome too btw.

Another Release Candidate is out. another round of fixes.

They say User/Browser JS isn't working. That's weird, because the image resizer script I'm using still works (since Opera doesn't scale down large images by default).

Those who'd like to try the script: Download this or this one.

On it right now... Looks pretty... Renders slower than Chrome though on my PC. I dunno why it does... I mean, it's fast... but images render so slow and/or start off as a "X" first before loading. Looks bad when loading some heavy websites.

Other than that, it's pretty decent. I never liked Widgets, so I don't use it. I pretty much strip it down to just tabs and browser bar. It starts up slower than Chrome too btw.

Copy and paste this:

opera:config#Update%20Delay

and play around with the values.

They say User/Browser JS isn't working. That's weird, because the image resizer script I'm using still works (since Opera doesn't scale down large images by default).

Those who'd like to try the script: Download this or this one.

Copy and paste this:

opera:config#Update%20Delay

and play around with the values.

Thanks for the tip... what would be good numbers IYO?

If you want the absolute fastest, you can try setting both values to 0. Keep in mind that you may see a lot of flickering as elements on the page are drawn as soon as possible.

I would try increasing the initial delay by a greater amount, say 1500 (which is enough on my end for Neowin's background to draw without showing white flickering), and keep the update delay as is or lower it to 0 if you like fast drawing of images.

edit: geez, another build already?

10.50 Release Candidate 3 for Windows

Opera 10.50 RC3 for Windows fixes these issues:

User JS/Browser JS fix

Fixed DSK-284257 (DEP (Data Execution Prevention) message)

Fixed DSK-284262 (Double-clicking on sent mail crashes Opera)

Fixed US-1881 (Opera Unite applications not localized in Opera 10.50 RC and RC2)

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2010/03/01/1050-rc3

They are working day and night to get it ready for tomorrow :o

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ocenaudio 3.19.4 by Razvan Serea  Ocenaudio is a full featured, fast and easy to use audio and music editor. It is the ideal software for people who need to edit and analyze audio files without complications. Ocenaudio also has powerful features that will please more advanced users. To assist ocenaudio development, a powerful toolset of audio editing, analysis and manipulation called Ocen Framework was created. ocenaudio is also based on Qt framework, a well known library for cross-platform development. Cross-platform support ocenaudio is available for all major operating systems: Microsoft Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. Native applications are generated for each platform from a common source, in order to achieve excelent performance and seamless integration with the operating system. All versions of ocenaudio have a uniform set of features and the same graphical interface, so the skills you learn in one platform can be used in the others. VST plugins support Ocenaudio supports VST (Virtual Studio Technology) plugins, giving its users access to numerous effects. Like the native effects, VST effects can use real-time preview to aide configuration. Real-time preview of effects Applying effects such as EQ, gain and filtering is an important part of audio editing. However, it is very tricky to get the desired result by adjusting the controls configuration alone: you must listen the processed audio. To ease the configuration of audio effects, ocenaudio has a real time preview feature: you hear the processed signal while adjusting the controls. The effect configuration window also includes a miniature view of the selected audio signal. You can navigate on this miniature view in the same way as you do on the main interface, selecting parts that interest you and listening to the effect result in real time. Multiselection for delicate editions To speed up complex audio files editing, ocenaudio includes multi-selection. With this amazing tool, you can simultaneously select different portions of an audio file and listen, edit or even apply an effect to them. For example, if you want to normalize only the excerpts of an interview where the interviewee is talking, just select them and apply the effect. Eficient edition of large files With ocenaudio, there is no limit to the length or the quantity of the audio files you can edit. Using an advanced memory management system, the application keeps your files open without wasting any of your computer's memory. Even in files several hours long, common editing operations such as copy, cut or paste happen almost instantly. Fully featured spectrogram Besides offering an incredible waveform view of your audio files, ocenaudio has a powerful and complete spectrogram view. In this view, you can analyze the spectral content of your audio signal with maximum clarity. Advanced users will be surprised to find that the spectrogram settings are applied in real time. The display is updated immediately when altering features such as the number of frequency bands, window type and size and dynamic range of the display. Ocenaudio 3.19.4 changelog: Adds fallback fonts so every language and symbol displays correctly Improves autosave and session recovery stability Improves region navigation and display Fixes a crash when the level meter is used on displays with a scaling greater than 200% Fixes memory corruption when using the silence selection tools Fixes crashes when closing a file while effects are still being processed Fixes a freeze when applying effects to many files at once (macOS) Fixes crashes related to audio devices on Windows Fixes invalid file names when exporting regions whose label is used as the file name Other bug fixes and improvements Download: Ocenaudio 64-bit | Portable | ~40.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Ocenaudio for Linux and Mac OS View: Ocenaudio Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      554
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!