Opera 10.50 RC for Windows Released


Recommended Posts

I wasn't an Opera fan before, but now with that development rate and direction it tops every other browser out there.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

For some reason it makes me a tad uneasy. Not necessarily saying that they won't pull it off with aplomb, but still...

Too bad Opera doesn't have Reload tab option when right-clicking on a tab :(

What does Create follower tab do when right-clicking on a tab? I don't get it :D

When you create a follower tab, any link you click in the original tab opens in the follower tab, even those that would originally open in the same tab.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

For some reason it makes me a tad uneasy. Not necessarily saying that they won't pull it off with aplomb, but still...

I am quite certain that this is just an exception (due to EU ballot screen) and Opera will go back to the usual trend of thoroughly testing each build from the next version.

When you create a follower tab, any link you click in the original tab opens in the follower tab, even those that would originally open in the same tab.

That and also the tab inherits properties such as Zoom level from the parent tab.

some sites still render without rounded corners

That's because the sites are using vendor/browser-specific CSS to do it. They need to remove the browser-specific prefix.

Too bad Opera doesn't have Reload tab option when right-clicking on a tab :(

Why not just click the Reload icon? Or you can right-click on the page itself.

I'm not sure if breakneck development speed is really something to be happy over.

Chrome may keep adding new features every few weeks or days, but that only applies to the beta and dev channels, and the code is often thoroughly tested before being released as stable. But Opera? Pre-alpha to release quality in 3 months? Orly?

Excuse me, but have you seen the massive progress since the pre-alpha? Yes, the breakneck development speed is indeed something to be happy about. It's not just development, but it's stabilized increadibly quickly. They are clearly testing stuff properly, and whatever's left is quickly picked out when testing snapshots, and fixed shortly after.

I think should concentrate of a polishing Opera 10.5 rather than trying to take even more advantage of EU's generosity.

What do you think they are doing right now? They have uploaded builds with hundreds of fixes and polishing just these last few days. I find it odd that someone complains about polish when that's all they have been doing since the pre-alpha.

Excuse me, but have you seen the massive progress since the pre-alpha? Yes, the breakneck development speed is indeed something to be happy about. It's not just development, but it's stabilized increadibly quickly. They are clearly testing stuff properly, and whatever's left is quickly picked out when testing snapshots, and fixed shortly after.

Yep, that's what I meant, I also appreciate this speedy (and quality) development because it's not something you see a lot in a browser (take a look at how long does it take IE or Firefox developers to release a new stable version for example).

Speed of development doesn't have to be inversely proportional to polish of release IMO, especially in this crazy browsers wars.

What do you think they are doing right now? They have uploaded builds with hundreds of fixes and polishing just these last few days. I find it odd that someone complains about polish when that's all they have been doing since the pre-alpha.

Maybe it's because I've got used to the slightly longer development time of Firefox versions. I tried the first Beta of 10.5 and noticed a few weird things ,maybe it's better now, I'll install it this RC.

Maybe it's because I've got used to the slightly longer development time of Firefox versions. I tried the first Beta of 10.5 and noticed a few weird things ,maybe it's better now, I'll install it this RC.

Opera usually have much longer development cycles as well. The bailout screen have change that for 10.5. After the coming week the cycle will probably go down a bit. They will also focus on the Mac and Linux versions.

Opera lost me as a customer ever since they cried like little girls and complained to the EU that there browser wasn't popular enough. Before that I considered using it but now its only Firefox, Chrome and IE9 (when its released) for me.

In addition there just seems to be way too many bugs, almost every post is someone saying bug# still exists.

Opera lost me as a customer ever since they cried like little girls and complained to the EU that there browser wasn't popular enough.

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they filed an antitrust complaint against Microsoft?

Did Microsoft lose you as a customer when they filed an antitrust complaint against Google?

Did Mozilla lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Are you consistent, or is it just another knee-jerk reaction based on lack of knowledge of the subject matter?

Before that I considered using it but now its only Firefox, Chrome and IE9 (when its released) for me.

Oops, looks like there's some hypocrisy going on here! Apparently it's fine for Google and Microsoft to file false antitrust complaints (they were rejected), but when Opera files a perfectly reasonable complaint because of Microsoft's proven illegal activities, then that's bad all of a sudden!

Gotta love inconsistency, hypocrisy and double standards :D

In addition there just seems to be way too many bugs, almost every post is someone saying bug# still exists.

Welcome to the world of browser development. That's the way other browsers have it too.

Man 10.5 is coming along fast :)

EDIT: this build seems to have regressed a bit. I loved that they had moved the trash button on the tab bar all the way to the right in the last build and now its back in that weird spot before the window buttons :( And the lighter blue color for the tabs looks ugly.

The skin's not finished yet. There might be a final update to the skin...

The new tabs are okay except for the chunky shadow on the left-most tab.

Opera usually have much longer development cycles as well. The bailout screen have change that for 10.5. After the coming week the cycle will probably go down a bit. They will also focus on the Mac and Linux versions.

To top it off, they also split up their development teams, instead of having one large team working on the Windows, Mac and Unix/Linux builds all at once, they have a team working on the Windows builds, a team working on the Mac builds, etc. They are probably rushing to get 10.5 on Windows out the door due to the browser ballot screen, but they also split up their teams, so they can focus on getting a full Windows build out to please a larger majority of the market, then they can focus on the other builds to please the others. Like you said, once 10.5 for Windows releases, development on Windows is going to drop dramatically until the other OS releases catch up.

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they filed an antitrust complaint against Microsoft?

Did Microsoft lose you as a customer when they filed an antitrust complaint against Google?

Did Mozilla lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Did Google lose you as a "customer" when they joined the antitrust complaint against Microsoft in the EU?

Are you consistent, or is it just another knee-jerk reaction based on lack of knowledge of the subject matter?

Oops, looks like there's some hypocrisy going on here! Apparently it's fine for Google and Microsoft to file false antitrust complaints (they were rejected), but when Opera files a perfectly reasonable complaint because of Microsoft's proven illegal activities, then that's bad all of a sudden!

Gotta love inconsistency, hypocrisy and double standards :D

Welcome to the world of browser development. That's the way other browsers have it too.

What Microsoft did wasn't illegal, bundling a browser with their operating system isn't a crime in any country. Opera, Mozilla or any other company should have no say in how another (more importantly a competitor) operates their business.

Btw I just tried the Opera browser and its really buggy I'm amazed. First it wouldn't import my bookmarks from Firefox no matter what I did, then it would render certain websites differently to how ever other browser does it. The built-in email program is a great idea which I looked forward to trying out but sadly it wouldn't render the email as HTML and kept showing the tags making it useless, also for some stupid reason the dates the emails were received were completely different so emails I got last year were showing up as being received only today. :wacko:

Opera does have a nice UI though but that simply isn't enough to get me to change from my existing browser(s).

Btw I just tried the Opera browser and its really buggy I'm amazed. First it wouldn't import my bookmarks from Firefox no matter what I did, then it would render certain websites differently to how ever other browser does it. The built-in email program is a great idea which I looked forward to trying out but sadly it wouldn't render the email as HTML and kept showing the tags making it useless, also for some stupid reason the dates the emails were received were completely different so emails I got last year were showing up as being received only today. :wacko:

Many sites use browser-specific code, so its not unusual for a website to look a bit different in one browser compared to another. The main thing is whether it looks rendered correctly or not, and even if it looks wrong, it could be browser-sniffing code designed for an older version of Opera, and the site simply hasn't updated it for the rendering improvements in 10.5. Odd about your email issues, HTML emails render fine for me.....and the dates have never shown up wrong either.

On it right now... Looks pretty... Renders slower than Chrome though on my PC. I dunno why it does... I mean, it's fast... but images render so slow and/or start off as a "X" first before loading. Looks bad when loading some heavy websites.

Other than that, it's pretty decent. I never liked Widgets, so I don't use it. I pretty much strip it down to just tabs and browser bar. It starts up slower than Chrome too btw.

Another Release Candidate is out. another round of fixes.

They say User/Browser JS isn't working. That's weird, because the image resizer script I'm using still works (since Opera doesn't scale down large images by default).

Those who'd like to try the script: Download this or this one.

On it right now... Looks pretty... Renders slower than Chrome though on my PC. I dunno why it does... I mean, it's fast... but images render so slow and/or start off as a "X" first before loading. Looks bad when loading some heavy websites.

Other than that, it's pretty decent. I never liked Widgets, so I don't use it. I pretty much strip it down to just tabs and browser bar. It starts up slower than Chrome too btw.

Copy and paste this:

opera:config#Update%20Delay

and play around with the values.

They say User/Browser JS isn't working. That's weird, because the image resizer script I'm using still works (since Opera doesn't scale down large images by default).

Those who'd like to try the script: Download this or this one.

Copy and paste this:

opera:config#Update%20Delay

and play around with the values.

Thanks for the tip... what would be good numbers IYO?

If you want the absolute fastest, you can try setting both values to 0. Keep in mind that you may see a lot of flickering as elements on the page are drawn as soon as possible.

I would try increasing the initial delay by a greater amount, say 1500 (which is enough on my end for Neowin's background to draw without showing white flickering), and keep the update delay as is or lower it to 0 if you like fast drawing of images.

edit: geez, another build already?

10.50 Release Candidate 3 for Windows

Opera 10.50 RC3 for Windows fixes these issues:

User JS/Browser JS fix

Fixed DSK-284257 (DEP (Data Execution Prevention) message)

Fixed DSK-284262 (Double-clicking on sent mail crashes Opera)

Fixed US-1881 (Opera Unite applications not localized in Opera 10.50 RC and RC2)

http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2010/03/01/1050-rc3

They are working day and night to get it ready for tomorrow :o

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!