Opera 10.50 RC for Windows Released


Recommended Posts

You forgot to show the bottom of the task manager where is shows 70% of your memory is free :yes: . But you can keep pretending that the memory usage actually effects you :).

Actually... it's only 55% memory free. Still, it's the point that it shouldn't be taking that much, Firefox does it too... Chrome I deal with cause if I need more RAM at all I just close a tab, not close the entire program just to restart it so I can have most of my memory back for another 5 minutes.

Here are my peacekeeper results:

post-182178-12674172582964_thumb.png

Tested with :

- Opera 10.5 RC3

- Chrome build 5.0.341.0 (40252)

- Firefox 3.6

Ironically, here's an older screenshot, I think I was testing Opera 10.5 Beta, as the picture is dated 2/12/2010:

post-182178-12674178184042_thumb.png

Look at the score increase on Chrome, it's a big difference.

I think the big red square Opera button in the top-left corner of the screen is atrocious and out of place, but otherwise, this is starting to look like a browser I'd like to use.

It can be removed, right click customize -> remove from tool bar. Menu can be accessed by the alt key.

You forgot to show the bottom of the task manager where is shows 70% of your memory is free :yes: . But you can keep pretending that the memory usage actually effects you :).

Just because we have lots of RAM, means that programs with memory leaks are acceptable?

Has the release candidate fixed this yet? In the task bar right click on one of the previews and click maximize--what happens? Currently Mozilla's implementation has about the same issue (nightly builds). Everyone seems to be dropping the ball when it comes to that right click menu. IE8 is the only one that has it right.

[edit: corrections made after updating to the latest RC build]

Just because we have lots of RAM, means that programs with memory leaks are acceptable?

Except it's not a memory leak. Opera is designed to use 10% of available memory at the default automatic memory setting. You see "high" memory usage because Opera caches all previous pages in memory, which is why the Back/Forward system is very quick.

Except it's not a memory leak. Opera is designed to use 10% of available memory at the default automatic memory setting. You see "high" memory usage because Opera caches all previous pages in memory, which is why the Back/Forward system is very quick.

Exactly. As soon as something requests that memory Opera will relinquish it, until that point it will keep those pages in memory in case you decide to go back at all, otherwise it is wasted that Opera can use to increase your user experience. Caching that means that if you choose to go back to a previously opened page in the same tab, or open an already closed tab it will just pull it from cache instead of having to reload the page. It is the same thing that Windows 7 does on its own with things like SuperFetch, but in reverse. Instead of anticipating what you are going to do based on usage trends it just keeps what you've closed already in memory in case you want to go back.

Has the release candidate fixed this yet? In the task bar right click on one of the previews and click maximize--what happens? Currently Mozilla's implementation isn't much better (nightly builds). Everyone seems to be dropping the ball when it comes to that right click menu. IE8 is the only one that has it right.

Also, I would prefer the previews to disappear when you close them.

That's quite a nasty bug, and it's still in the RC.

Read your posts bud; and you keep outbursting on anyone who talks down Opera like they're idiots. Like I said, not everyone is having as much fun with 10.5, it IS buggy. Deal with that fact.

I never said that 10.5 wasn't buggy. I just responded to someone who posted hypocritical anti-Opera FUD. He posted some nonsense about not using Opera because Opera was doing something everyone else was doing anyway, and when I pointed out that, he responded with some vague "Opera sucks" comment which contained a bunch of nonsense that aren't even actual known bugs in Opera. I certainly don't know anyone who is unable to view HTML mail, for example. That is why I called it FUD, because it was so obviously an attempt to invent problems in order to change the subject, which was that he got caught with his pants down, double standards and all.

Chrome is still champ by my books

How predictable :)

Funny, staring at the latest stats for Browser Market share and it shows for Worldwide Stats, IE @ 53.52% and declining. Firefox @ 31.05% and declining. Chrome @ 7.57% and rising. Safari at 5.66% and rising... and last but not least.... Opera at 1.21% and declining.

It's too bad that such stats are useless. Do you really think a browser will drop magically from more than 2% the last day of one month, and way down the first day of the next?

http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-daily-20100227-20100301

It's also funny that StatCounter reported Chrome has having nearly double Opera's market share at a point when Google reported 30 million users for Chrome, while Opera reported that they had 40 million desktop users. How is that possible?

Except it's not a memory leak. Opera is designed to use 10% of available memory at the default automatic memory setting. You see "high" memory usage because Opera caches all previous pages in memory, which is why the Back/Forward system is very quick.

(Y)

Those of you crying "Leak!!" probably have never seen Opera running on a memory-starved machine. Hint: it still feels snappy and uses less RAM. Unlike a certain furry creature that seems to eat about the same amount of memory, no matter which machine I run it on..

Edit: Dear lord. I just finished installing RC1 this morning, and RC3 is already up?? Freaking zombies...

First of all, I said reminiscent. There are two schools of thought on what it means for software to be bloated--some say it's simply file size, others say it's how the software feels.

It sounds like you are saying that the second school of thought is one where you can basically throw around the "bloated" label for anything you don't like. I don't think that's very useful. Bloat has a very useful definition, which I pointed out. "Doesn't feel right" just doesn't cut it :)

They have RCs for the Windows version buts hows the development progressing for OSX and Linux?

Mac is a beta, and rather buggy. Linux is extremely buggy and not even beta. Maybe they'll move over people from Windows once it's out to speed up those as well.

Linux is extremely buggy and not even beta. Maybe they'll move over people from Windows once it's out to speed up those as well.

Yeah, the linux release is totally not worth it, for now.

On that note, Chromium's linux offering is progressing quite nicely.

I never said that 10.5 wasn't buggy. I just responded to someone who posted hypocritical anti-Opera FUD. He posted some nonsense about not using Opera because Opera was doing something everyone else was doing anyway, and when I pointed out that, he responded with some vague "Opera sucks" comment which contained a bunch of nonsense that aren't even actual known bugs in Opera. I certainly don't know anyone who is unable to view HTML mail, for example. That is why I called it FUD, because it was so obviously an attempt to invent problems in order to change the subject, which was that he got caught with his pants down, double standards and all.

How predictable :)

It's too bad that such stats are useless. Do you really think a browser will drop magically from more than 2% the last day of one month, and way down the first day of the next?

http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-daily-20100227-20100301

It's also funny that StatCounter reported Chrome has having nearly double Opera's market share at a point when Google reported 30 million users for Chrome, while Opera reported that they had 40 million desktop users. How is that possible?

To clear one thing up in what you said at first... I just got an HTML email, and I was unable to view it properly. But, I also realize that this is just a RC. Not a final build. Everything can be fixed. I wasn't just calling you a troll for that one statement, I think you're just an huge fanboy that can't handle other peoples negative opinion on Opera. But I could also be wrong, again, this is just the way you're coming off.

Predictable about me still liking Chrome over Opera? What do you expect? Because the benchmarks may show Opera in the lead, it still doesn't FEEL as snappy and doesn't FEEL like it renders faster than Chrome. I stated this was still my opinion and I haven't said that Opera was a bad browser. Don't label me predictable because Chrome is clearly better in my opinion. You're just asking for an argument at that point. But I won't turn this into one. You have your opinion, and I have mine. As does everyone else. I've stated what I dislike about Opera! Yet, I am still testing it! I am on Opera 10.5 RC3 as I type this! I still want to try different scenarios to see if it could replace Chrome, but right now, Chrome remains the default.

Those statistics that you are bashing so hard have been right about the marketshare before. In fact, every stat website is still showing Chrome ahead, with Opera still declining in usage. Why? Because Opera doesn't have the resources Google has. I really don't see how they can compete, but they also have some die-hard fanboys (go look in the mirror for one! haha) Which is fine, every piece of software has some sort of Fanboy. :) I enjoy Chrome, I like Opera too, just not going to replace Chrome till I can see something on it WORTH replacing Chrome for.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!