HBO's Game of Thrones

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

GameOverRob

Posted
Posted

What is different?

You see what happens in the book with what comes out of her, but you have no idea what it was or where it came from (I can't really tell you what happens as it would kind of spoil it), but then like 400 pages later in the book it goes back and shows you the scene that we saw at the end of the episode today with Davos and the Lady in Red.

Mentor

S00N3R FR3AK

Posted
Posted

You see what happens in the book with what comes out of her, but you have no idea what it was or where it came from (I can't really tell you what happens as it would kind of spoil it), but then like 400 pages later in the book it goes back and shows you the scene that we saw at the end of the episode today with Davos and the Lady in Red.

I couldn't help myself and read the plots on wikipedia, so is it

The Shadow that kills Renly

Grand Master

GameOverRob

Posted
Posted

I couldn't help myself and read the plots on wikipedia, so is it

The Shadow that kills Renly

Yes

Basically in the book Renly gets killed by the shadow and you are like WTF happened and you literally have no clue till way later on in the book it goes back to the scene we saw tonight.

Grand Master

_neutrino Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Well i have stopped watching , it seams to just be blatant porno anymore, There was a lot in season 1 but I am done. There is a limit to when it is understood in the story and when it is just sex for the sake of getting it on television.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Well i have stopped watching , it seams to just be blatant porno anymore, There was a lot in season 1 but I am done. There is a limit to when it is understood in the story and when it is just sex for the sake of getting it on television.

there was no nudity in this weeks episode at all :pinch:

Grand Master

#Michael

Posted
Posted

Well i have stopped watching , it seams to just be blatant porno anymore, There was a lot in season 1 but I am done. There is a limit to when it is understood in the story and when it is just sex for the sake of getting it on television.

Reason number 1 why it is on HBO here in the states. It would never be shown on standard network tv in its current form. But that aside, I am loving the story line and what it is about. Probably the best series I have seen in a great while.

Mentor

burnsflipper

Posted
Posted
Well i have stopped watching , it seams to just be blatant porno anymore, There was a lot in season 1 but I am done. There is a limit to when it is understood in the story and when it is just sex for the sake of getting it on television.

I'll take sex over guts and violence any day

Grand Master

GameOverRob

Posted
Posted

Great episode, love HBO shows so well made.

Fair enough if you decided to give up on the show, can't say I agree with your reasons behind it but each to their own. Just please don't be one of those idiots who complains to the network like what happened with Nikita and got the violence toned down.

Mentor

Slammers

Posted
Posted

There's not even that much sex/nudity?!? It's certainly not just there for the point of it anyway. Compared to sparticus it's like sesame street pron wise and violence wise.

I really thought the scene with Joffry shuving that object up the ###### ass was awesome the way it really made you realise just how sick he really is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By excalpius · Posted

      >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end

      By cyberhash · Posted

      As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Rockstar confirms Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders begin next week, unveils cover art

      By TCA · Posted

      Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • Rockstar confirms Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders begin next week, unveils cover art

      By TCA · Posted

      I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!