Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
6 hours ago, soniqstylz said:

melisandrebath.jpg

 

Just watched the scene again on Vimeo (can not post it here because of booobs) .... I think Selyse saw her in her true form but we, the viewers, still saw her as the hot redhead.  Or Selyse saw her as the young woman without the help of additional tricks for whatever reason (maybe her strong belief in the Lord of Light).  Or...the producers simply messed up.  haha

4 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

 

Just watched the scene again on Vimeo (can not post it here because of booobs) .... I think Selyse saw her in her true form but we, the viewers, still saw her as the hot redhead.  Or Selyse saw her as the young woman without the help of additional tricks for whatever reason (maybe her strong belief in the Lord of Light).  Or...the producers simply messed up.  haha

I'm going to go with the latter.

1 hour ago, jjkusaf said:

 

Just watched the scene again on Vimeo (can not post it here because of booobs) .... I think Selyse saw her in her true form but we, the viewers, still saw her as the hot redhead.  Or Selyse saw her as the young woman without the help of additional tricks for whatever reason (maybe her strong belief in the Lord of Light).  Or...the producers simply messed up.  haha

 

During the scene in the bathtub, if I remember correctly, she makes a point of using potions to achieve various tricks, and asks Selyse to hand her over a bottle of something. Flashforward to this scene, when she takes off the necklace, she puts it right next to a small bottled potion. I think the necklace alone isn't what does the glamour, I think it's just something that enhances her powers or effects of the trickery she uses. Remember the only other time that the stone glowed (I think) was when we were first introduced to her, and she drinks that poison, but nothing happens to her. That clearly didn't have anything to do with her glamour tricks, but it probably enhanced her "poison resistance" or whatever she did to avoid being poisoned.

 

Anyway, pretty much a typical first episode, save for the reveal at the end. The Dothraki were hilarious. Some pretty nice framing in this episode, I must say, some shots looked really great imo (the camera panning over arya but not showing her, then going back to reveal her, Ellaria standing over dead Doran, Jaime on the balcony). I hope this trend continues. And I hope they keep getting their budgets increased.

  • Like 2
19 hours ago, Luc2k said:

Needs more plot holes and blatant inconsistencies because teleporting Sand Snakes and disappearing dogs just won't do. Anyway, it was a typical post season 3 Game of Fanfiction episode.

The dogs ran away with one of the Bolton's guys. I know, because on my second watch I noticed they just disappear, so I went back an counted the kills. Could have been shown better, but it's not really a plot hole. The Sand Snakes definitely borrowed S2 Littlefinger's transportation device, but it can also be explained that they boarded a smaller, faster ship and followed them or something. The show does seem to be forced to take shortcuts with the amount of trimming they do, and they don't always do a stellar job with it, but oh well. Not their fault they're constricted to 10 episodes per season and the fact that the books won't be done for another decade, if ever.

8 hours ago, Syanide said:

The dogs ran away with one of the Bolton's guys. I know, because on my second watch I noticed they just disappear, so I went back an counted the kills. Could have been shown better, but it's not really a plot hole. The Sand Snakes definitely borrowed S2 Littlefinger's transportation device, but it can also be explained that they boarded a smaller, faster ship and followed them or something. The show does seem to be forced to take shortcuts with the amount of trimming they do, and they don't always do a stellar job with it, but oh well. Not their fault they're constricted to 10 episodes per season and the fact that the books won't be done for another decade, if ever.

Never said the dogs were a plot hole. As for the Sand Sankes, I guess they went the other way around the continent so they didn't get noticed (or perhaps they used a submarine), sort of like Yara "did" when she the attacked the Dreadfort. I just don't believe it takes rocket science to write out plot holes or that it even requires any source material for it.

6 hours ago, Luc2k said:

Never said the dogs were a plot hole. As for the Sand Sankes, I guess they went the other way around the continent so they didn't get noticed (or perhaps they used a submarine), sort of like Yara "did" when she the attacked the Dreadfort. I just don't believe it takes rocket science to write out plot holes or that it even requires any source material for it.

 

Now you're just exaggerating. Come to think of it, they could have boarded any trading ships, or a ship pretending to be a trading ship to tail them, and that's it. It's not like they had radio communication on the seas and shared info on their passengers between different ships. No issues there.

 

And there's zero flaws with Yara's trip either. She takes off at the end of season 3, using the 'fastest' ship which they make a point of, and makes it I believe five episodes into season 4.

15 hours ago, Syanide said:

Now you're just exaggerating. Come to think of it, they could have boarded any trading ships, or a ship pretending to be a trading ship to tail them, and that's it. It's not like they had radio communication on the seas and shared info on their passengers between different ships. No issues there.

 

And there's zero flaws with Yara's trip either. She takes off at the end of season 3, using the 'fastest' ship which they make a point of, and makes it I believe five episodes into season 4.

They could have also boarded a magical unicorn. Given that Myrcella was killed right off the coast Jamie and the crew would be on high alert coming from behind. I also doubt they took the scenic route at a leisurely pace with the corpse of his daughter rotting in the boat. Even ignoring this, I doubt any Sand Snake would get on a boat so soon after Jaime left. I do concede that maybe I'm thinking too much of the books where Doran didn't have only one loyal incompetent guard. In the end it comes back to bad writing.

 

Yara's trip being flawless is one of the most hilarious mental gymnastics I've witnessed when it comes to bad writing in GoT. There's nothing you can say that can save that pitiful display. She went more than the full length of the continent in "the fastest ship", which would presumably be a warship through potentially hostile waters like The Arbor, which don't like the Iron Islands very much I might add, with no snag whatsoever, only to finally reach the Dreadfort and be chased off by, what was it, 3 dogs and 2-3 men?

57 minutes ago, Luc2k said:

They could have also boarded a magical unicorn. Given that Myrcella was killed right off the coast Jamie and the crew would be on high alert coming from behind. I also doubt they took the scenic route at a leisurely pace with the corpse of his daughter rotting in the boat. Even ignoring this, I doubt any Sand Snake would get on a boat so soon after Jaime left. I do concede that maybe I'm thinking too much of the books where Doran didn't have only one loyal incompetent guard. In the end it comes back to bad writing.

 

Yara's trip being flawless is one of the most hilarious mental gymnastics I've witnessed when it comes to bad writing in GoT. There's nothing you can say that can save that pitiful display. She went more than the full length of the continent in "the fastest ship", which would presumably be a warship through potentially hostile waters like The Arbor, which don't like the Iron Islands very much I might add, with no snag whatsoever, only to finally reach the Dreadfort and be chased off by, what was it, 3 dogs and 2-3 men?

Ships from China took as few as 100 days to get to England all the way around around Africa (click). She leaves in S03E10, arrives in S04E06. She could have probably sailed twice around a smaller continent like Westeros in that time.

 

Anyway, I just realized I'm arguing the time it takes to sail around a nonexisting continent, so this is where I'll draw the line with that.

 

Back to the story, yes, the assault on Dreadfort is the prime example of where the show kind of asks of you to turn a blind eye to the ridiculousness of the situation, simply because they have to drive a point across quickly. In this case, they had to give Yara something to do, and they had to make her believe that Theon is dead, while she still knew that Reek is alive (quite possibly to create conflict for this season), and the entire fight came off as incredibly sloppy.

 

But I still think it's all minor flaws. So you can call it Game of Fanfiction, but in the same way, going forward, the books will technically be a novelization :p

I thought tonight was a solid episode.

 

Spoiler

but argh...Ramsey needs to be slaughtered for pig feed.  Hope he doesn't get a quickish death like Joffrey.  Such a vile character.

 

Saw the ending coming ... I'm sure we all did.  At least she didn't take of the choker to perform her magic. :)

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!