Recommended Posts

How can I best increase my performance? Will I have to reduce the resolution of the game? I run it on Lowest settings at 1440x900 and still get lag occasionally (usually from particle effects).

Just dl'd the pc patch. Jumped intoa server quick to test the new chopper handling. MUCH improved. Before it was really difficult to strafe with the chopper making flying around so your gunner can kill people very hard. Now just moving my mouse side to side makes it strafe side to side making things much easier.

At 1680x1050 the text box doesnt bother me at all, I hardly even noticed it. And the chat is massively improved so its worth it.

Probably not going to play today because so far as expected all the servers are doing their usual post update lag storm.

Are there new patches out for the consoles or is it just PC?

The consoles already got most of the fixes that we got in this latest patch.

man i am so annoyed (pc version).

Their last patch ruined the whole melee knifing, collecting dog tags thing. They are going to undo that with the next patch which was planned for release in may i think. but they're adding more crap i guess, i dunno.

I want my knife back! half the time now it doesnt even work, which makes the game less fun for me.

I unlocked everything months ago which sucks. hopefully they'll provide new weapons in the next patch.

The knife was fixed with the patch. I knifed several people and it worked fine.

Chopper flying difficult? It’s a piece of ****! Desert Combat or BF2 would have had you raging if you thing BC2 is hard. I can’t do nearly hard the stuff I could in BF2. I use to be able to barrel roll in BF2 (and survive I might add!)

Dude chill. You cant barrel roll of course but this game isn't even big enough for maneuvers like that to work well. I could also fly the bf2 chopper well and do barrel rolls. The reason I said it was "hard" (not hard in that I crashed or anything) before the patch was it was so un-maneuvererable you couldn't really do anything... On the pc version anyway, the console version already had decent handling. The PC chopper was nerfed to all hell before this update.

Chopper flying difficult? It’s a piece of ****! Desert Combat or BF2 would have had you raging if you thing BC2 is hard. I can’t do nearly hard the stuff I could in BF2. I use to be able to barrel roll in BF2 (and survive I might add!)

The helicopter handling in BF2 was unrealistic. In BC2, it's slightly more realistic. There aren't any big maps in BC2 like there was in BF2 (which gave you the room to do crazy stunts).

they didn't fix my m16 at all :(

The only assault rifle that they "changed" is the AN-94.

How do you control the helicopter? I get in, pilot it, and crash 10 seconds latter. :p

I did that generally with helicopters, not just in this but in BF Heroes as well. Haven't played the update yet so we'll see, been too preoccupied with Counter-Strike again :p

The helicopter handling in BF2 was unrealistic. In BC2, it's slightly more realistic. There aren't any big maps in BC2 like there was in BF2 (which gave you the room to do crazy stunts).

Doesn't matter to me it's unrealistic. It's more fun. You could do a damn sight more in BF2. Incoming Javelin? DO A BARREL ROLL.

Had a quick play last night first of all, lost all my custom bindings. Crouch seems broken for me (yes I am aware of the new crouch toggle).

At the moment, it is worse than before for me. But then again I haven't played in almost three weeks. So it may take a while to get back into the flow of things.

Finally finished getting platinum for my AUG, now I don't know what I'll use next, I'm thinking the 870mcs or the G3.

And my loading time problem seems to have gone away, I don't know if it was just a fluke last night or because I upgraded my graphics drivers. And the performance seems to be pretty good now in the game, I don't think I ever went below 50 fps while playing today.

Finally finished getting platinum for my AUG, now I don't know what I'll use next, I'm thinking the 870mcs or the G3.
The AUG? Much respect man. I class the AUG and F2000 are some of the crappiest weapons I have ever had the displeasure of using!

Apparently the G3 is the new M60.

And my loading time problem seems to have gone away, I don't know if it was just a fluke last night or because I upgraded my graphics drivers. And the performance seems to be pretty good now in the game, I don't think I ever went below 50 fps while playing today.
Never had any problems with loading time. But my FPS has dropped by around 30 FPS. Used to get a solid 90 FPS, now it is hovering around 60FPS. I can tell the difference.

I would put the AUG on par with the M416, it's a really decent gun, imo. I may try the AEK next though, I'm not sure.

And I don't see how the G3 and the M60 can even be compared. The G3 only has a 20 round clip and can't use attachments. The main attraction with the M60 was that it could be spammed almost endless and turned into a sniper rifle with the acog scope. But if all the M60 spammers start using the G3 then I'll use something else, I don't want to be a band wagoner. :laugh:

Are you perhaps thinking the G36 instead of just the G3?

I would put the AUG on par with the M416, it's a really decent gun, imo. I may try the AEK next though, I'm not sure.
On par with the M416? Are you having a laugh? M416 is a god like gun, compared to the puny mortal that is the Aug. It is no where as NEAR as good at the M416. AEK is decent and often under-rated gun (Y)
And I don't see how the G3 and the M60 can even be compared. The G3 only has a 20 round clip and can't use attachments. The main attraction with the M60 was that it could be spammed almost endless and turned into a sniper rifle with the acog scope. But if all the M60 spammers start using the G3 then I'll use something else, I don't want to be a band wagoner. :laugh:

Are you perhaps thinking the G36 instead of just the G3?

Dunno, might have been the G3/G36 but EVERYONE was using it.

Lately, I've been using the AUG and it isn't that good. I prefer the M416 over it because it has a similar rate of fire with better accuracy.

By the way, Singh400... I looked at your stats on BFBCS and damn, how the hell do you have 89% accuracy? Mine is only 33% and that's pretty high compared to the stats I've seen.

Lately, I've been using the AUG and it isn't that good. I prefer the M416 over it because it has a similar rate of fire with better accuracy.

By the way, Singh400... I looked at your stats on BFBCS and damn, how the hell do you have 89% accuracy? Mine is only 33% and that's pretty high compared to the stats I've seen.

89 percent accuracy on what? Clicking on that page, gives me "Accuracy: 28%" and no weapon got 89%.

Lately, I've been using the AUG and it isn't that good. I prefer the M416 over it because it has a similar rate of fire with better accuracy.

By the way, Singh400... I looked at your stats on BFBCS and damn, how the hell do you have 89% accuracy? Mine is only 33% and that's pretty high compared to the stats I've seen.

89 percent accuracy on what? Clicking on that page, gives me "Accuracy: 28%" and no weapon got 89%.
Pay no heed to any stats, especially accuracy. They are bugged as hell. One minute I'm 238% (no kidding) and the next I am 13%.

89 percent accuracy on what? Clicking on that page, gives me "Accuracy: 28%" and no weapon got 89%.

It showed 89% before. I wouldn't have linked his stats here otherwise.

Pay no heed to any stats, especially accuracy. They are bugged as hell. One minute I'm 238% (no kidding) and the next I am 13%.

You're right. It shows you as having 28% now. :s

On par with the M416? Are you having a laugh? M416 is a god like gun, compared to the puny mortal that is the Aug. It is no where as NEAR as good at the M416. AEK is decent and often under-rated gun (Y)

Dunno, might have been the G3/G36 but EVERYONE was using it.

I haven't touched the M416, AN-94, M16, or the XM8 since the last patch so I don't know what it's like now. So I'm comparing the post patch AUG to the pre R7 patch M416.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!