Antibody could lead to HIV vaccine


Recommended Posts

Antibody could lead to HIV vaccine

Scientists discover how substance fights off AIDS virus

WASHINGTON, June 26 ? Researchers said Thursday they have figured out how a rare antibody sees past the disguises of the AIDS virus ? a finding that may lead to a vaccine that will finally work against the killer microbe.

THE ANTIBODY, taken from a unusual patient whose body can resist the virus, recognizes and attacks the human immunodeficiency virus, unlike most of the body?s defense. ?Nothing like this has ever been seen before,? Ian Wilson of The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif., who led the research, said in a statement. AIDS has killed 25 million people around the world and is projected to kill 80 million by 2010. The only real hope of fighting the incurable virus is a vaccine, but efforts so far have flopped although dozens of vaccines are being tested.

Antibodies are an important arm of the body?s defenses against germs. They are usually able to recognize an invader by structures on its surface, called antigens, and can either call in help, or neutralize it themselves by pasting themselves against it. Most vaccines in use today stimulate the production of neutralizing antibodies. The human body makes plenty of antibodies against HIV, but the virus disguises itself with human sugars. One antibody seems to be able to see past this ruse. Called 2G12, it was found by Austrian researchers a decade ago in a patient who seemed to resist acquired immune deficiency syndrome ? the condition caused as HIV destroys the immune system over time.

ANTIBODY?S SPECIAL STRUCTURE

Writing in the journal Science, Wilson and colleagues said they had figured out how 2G12 does it. It recognizes that while HIV is covered up with human sugars, they are not arranged in a human-like way. The antibody does this with a special structure of its own, which Wilson and colleagues, including a team at Oxford University in Britain, have crystallized and imaged. ?The Fab (antigen recognition) arms are interlocked,? said Scripps researcher Dennis Burton, who worked on the study. ?That is a unique arrangement, and it is good for recognizing a cluster of shapes like sugars on a virus.?

Now what needs to be done is to use the structure of the antibody as a template to design an antigen to stimulate the production of 2G12 or another antibody that will neutralize HIV, the researchers said. The approach might also work for making vaccines against other germs, said Wilson. ?Can we now use this to engineer antibodies with higher affinity against other antigens or clusters of antigens?? he ask

Source: MSNBC

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/88327-antibody-could-lead-to-hiv-vaccine/
Share on other sites

Cool. Very cool. Looks like I'll have to buy Journal of Science this month.

I hope that patents do not get applied to this. There's millions of people whos lives could be saved or improved as a result of this. I for one am not going to let a patent pass on this w/o putting up a serious fight.

Now thats some really good news there shockz.If they can find an antibody that can fight aids maybe just maybe a cure for cancer might not be to far off,Ive lost family and friends to cancer :( so news like this can only bring hope.Thanks for the info.

Edited by Danimal
Can you imagine that test group?

"We'd like to find out if you're immune to HIV, would you please accept this injection so we can rule you out?"

That's being silly.

They're not going to inject people w/ it. They would proably first test the DNA in individuals and see if they carry the gene responsible for making that particular antibody. After, they'll collect a sample of blood, put in the AIDS virus and see how well the antibodies fight it off. Then if all is sucessfull they'll start w/ clinical trials in a few years.

Now thats some really good news there shockz.If they can find an antibody that can fight aids maybe just maybe a cure for cancer might not be to far off,Ive lost family and friends to cancer :( so news like this can only bring hope.Thanks for the info.

someone actually posted a news article here recently that said that scientists created some sort of injection, and mice with brain cancer were completely cured. 50% of the mice who didn't get the injection died, and the other 50% showed no sign of cancer at all.

they're hoping it'll translate over into humans

someone actually posted a news article here recently that said that scientists created some sort of injection, and mice with brain cancer were completely cured. 50% of the mice who didn't get the injection died, and the other 50% showed no sign of cancer at all.

they're hoping it'll translate over into humans

Yeah I heard that too on the news on TV, and they interviewed a guy about it. Although I didn't read the review posted on this website, the news definately sounded promicing. This could be just what we are searching for.......unfortunately costs for the drug are/will be extremely high, according to the piece I saw.

that's good news, but i wish they worked quick to find cure for cancer, which in my opinion is a lot more imprtant that aids, because cancer victims aren't responsible for surferring, while AIDs victims though, not all of the times, are responsible for catching the virus. My point being, with good care, AIDS can and should be prevented, however there has been no totally proven way to stop cancer.

Props to the scientists in England for finding this! This could open a huge gateway to disease fighting, and possibly lead a to a cure for cancer quicker.

That's something that annoys me greatly about medicine. The costs of treatment. I always liken it to this little scenario...

"doctor...I'm dying.... please, can you treat me?"

"Sure thing sonny, but first, show me the color of your money!"

That is what it comes down to. Sure, we can cure you but it's gonna cost ya. So sad... :no:

Yeah, unfortuantely its not the doctors that set the prices - its the drug manufacturers themselves. And they are not making drugs and medicine for the perpose of curing people - they treat it as a business and are purely there to make money.

I heard somwhere (sorry, no source I'll try and find one....) that a lot of todays drugs that the public have to pay for could be made and sold at a much cheaper price. The only reason they charge so much is because of business - they want to make as much monet as possible, and people can't say 'no' beacuse they, in most cases, really need the drugs in order to live a normal life. That to me is sad, and really needs to be sorted out - people should not pay copious amounts of money just to save their own lives (or at least live at a higher standard of life), when they could be be paying the minimum - just the making costs, not the extra which goes straight into manufacturer's back pockets.

--EDIT--

Here are some (loose) links to what I was trying to describe. They do not explain fully what I was reffering to above, but they give you some idea that price manipulation does happen:

http://www.cbgnetwork.org/home/Newsletter_...kcb__29___.html

http://desmoinesregister.com/opinion/stori...5/20275512.html

http://www.prescription-drugs-lawsuits.com/

Edited by farsightxc2
i didnt know it'd be expensive, that sucks, but it figures. but really, if i had cancer and it meant paying 10,000 dollars or dying, who do i write the check to?

Samoa on Neowin.net .............will do just fine. :yes: Also include on the check a call contact number in case I have problems cashing the check...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!