Recommended Posts

It has been 7 months since Windows 7 came to the market and Chrome still doesn't support all the new great taskbar features of Windows 7. When Chrome 4 came out we all thought that Google would provide support, but they didn't. They said that they would provide support in Chrome 5...Well, guess what? It won't happen! Implementation of AeroPeek was moved to Chrome 6...

This is ridiculous and shows that amateurs are developing for Chrome...

According to [email protected] : "It is Chrome 6. I disabled my current AeroPeek code on Chrome 5 because it has lots

of problems and I noticed I needed to change lots of my code to fix them."

In other words what he is saying is:"My code was so bad, I don't have the time to fix it now because I have other priorities" - Very professional....

You can read about it here: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=38771

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/889914-chrome-5-wont-support-aeropeek/
Share on other sites

Hahaha, how is it unprofessional? If the browser has stability or security problems, would you rather see him work on flashy Windows 7 features?

Yes, software developers often produce code that doesn't work from the start. Microsoft developers. Apple developers. Mozilla developers. Google developers.

Edit: Wow, I see you also added your unconstructive criticism to that bug. Please leave the bug pages to developer discussions. Your "contribution" will only serve to annoy them. They know if a bug is requested by the stars/votes.

Its better to have regular releases with new features than to postpone chrome 5 for months to add aeropeek. Chrome still has alot of weaknesses in terms of customising the browser compared to firefox, its better for them to add those kind of things first instead of aeropeek as not that many people use windows 7 yet. Chrome 4.1 is pretty nice, i'm sure chrome 5 will be even better.

It's quite obvious that AeroPeek needs the code to do things it wasn't designed for. Therefore it is more a design issue rather than the code itself. They also don't say what issues the code has could be something "simple" like plugins not being shown in the thumbnails.

Either way, AeroPeek on a browser gets annoying fast, especially when you have a tab or 2 minimised/hidden and only really browsing on one and you keep switching between apps.

Hahaha, how is it unprofessional? If the browser has stability or security problems, would you rather see him work on flashy Windows 7 features?

Yes, software developers often produce code that doesn't work from the start. Microsoft developers. Apple developers. Mozilla developers. Google developers.

Edit: Wow, I see you also added your unconstructive criticism to that bug. Please leave the bug pages to developer discussions. Your "contribution" will only serve to annoy them. They know if a bug is requested by the stars/votes.

If you don't find it ridiculous that Chrome still doesn't support Windows 7, then I am sorry for you.

My criticism was fair and it just points out a fact: That Chrome doesn't support Windows 7 features. I do not want to use a browser that simply ignores the OS it is sitting on. When Microsoft or Apple (companies that develop commercial software) develop a feature, then it is done on another basis. There is always a program manager who manages a team of developers and the whole procedure is much more professional in comparison to open source development...

If the developers get annoyed by my criticism, that will be fine! Maybe they will start seeing how ridiculous they are...

It's quite obvious that AeroPeek needs the code to do things it wasn't designed for. Therefore it is more a design issue rather than the code itself. They also don't say what issues the code has could be something "simple" like plugins not being shown in the thumbnails.

Either way, AeroPeek on a browser gets annoying fast, especially when you have a tab or 2 minimised/hidden and only really browsing on one and you keep switching between apps.

Then there should be an option to disable it, just like in IE 8. I am just stating a fact here: Opera, Safari and IE8 have full support for Windows 7. Chrome & Firefox don't....Now from all these browsers, who has an open source development model?

Aero Peek is one of the flashy features which are nice to have, but not exactly a must. Google know what they're doing - they're not a bunch of amateurs hacking the browser together.

Maybe you are right, but the answer of the developer was pretty much amateur.

AeroPeek is a must have feature for me.

How is it unprofessional for a developer to have priorities? Some random flashy feature is not a priority. Standards support, performance, security are priorities, especially for the chrome team that are trying to make a lean, mean, fast browser.

If you find his answer to be professional, then sorry but I cannot follow you.

AeroPeek is really easy to implement, but Google don't want to implement it the way Microsoft is suggesting because that would make the browser a bit slower (I can also find the discussion on their dev site)....

How is it unprofessional for a developer to have priorities? Some random flashy feature is not a priority. Standards support, performance, security are priorities, especially for the chrome team that are trying to make a lean, mean, fast browser.

Exactly. And they're doing a pretty good job at it; on all three supported platforms too.

Exactly. And they're doing a pretty good job at it; on all three supported platforms too.

Opera and Safari have AeroPeek and they are also very good in supporting standards. They are also very fast...

As I said before, AeroPeek is easy to implement and Chrome should have the feature asap..

I wonder, from all of those who say AeroPeek isn't important. How many of you actually use Windows 7?

Opera and Safari have AeroPeek and they are also very good in supporting standards. They are also very fast...

As I said before, AeroPeek is easy to implement and Chrome should have the feature asap..

I wonder, from all of those who say AeroPeek isn't important. How many of you actually use Windows 7?

I'm using Chrome on Windows 7 as default browser on my netbook. And I really can't say I've used Aero Peek very often... for me it's quicker to find the tab I want to go to in the browser itself than by looking at the Aero Peek previews. YMMV of course.

I'm using Chrome on Windows 7 as default browser on my netbook. And I really can't say I've used Aero Peek very often... for me it's quicker to find the tab I want to go to in the browser itself than by looking at the Aero Peek previews. YMMV of course.

What I love about AeroPeek is the ability to quickly look at sth and then move on with what you were doing before. If I am in Outlook for example and want to see sth in IE 8, I just move the mouse over to the tab I need and then go back to Outlook. I can't do that with Chrome...

Wow, you're quite quick to jump to conclusions.

Things like this happen in closed source development all the time. Those companies that develop closed source are just better at hiding it. How many features has Microsoft not delivered on in Windows, or even Internet Explorer? Wasn't it more important that with IE7, Microsoft delivered half assed standards support and said "We'll fix it in IE8"?

If you think aero peek is a matter of a few hours, not a few days, then fix it yourself. All of the code is there for you. You seem to know what you're talking about, too, since you're able to state how long it should take to implement a feature, and how to prioritize them.

A web browser is a huge and complicated monster. Considering how solidly Google has built Chrome (see the pwn2own contest where no one knew how to hack it?), I think calling them amateurs is completely ungrounded in any fact, and just seems to be the opinion of a few guys who don't really have any idea what they're talking about.

Yes, I'm looking at you.

Opera and Safari have AeroPeek and they are also very good in supporting standards. They are also very fast...

As I said before, AeroPeek is easy to implement and Chrome should have the feature asap..

I wonder, from all of those who say AeroPeek isn't important. How many of you actually use Windows 7?

Opera and Safari are much older and developed than Chrome. Chrome's first public release was <2 years ago, Safari > 7 and Opera ~14. I expect the Chrome devs to focus more on getting the basic feature set (and their own goals) done before working on fluff.

P.S. No, I don't use Windows (any version).

Wow, you're quite quick to jump to conclusions.

Things like this happen in closed source development all the time. Those companies that develop closed source are just better at hiding it. How many features has Microsoft not delivered on in Windows, or even Internet Explorer? Wasn't it more important that with IE7, Microsoft delivered half assed standards support and said "We'll fix it in IE8"?

If you think aero peek is a matter of a few hours, not a few days, then fix it yourself. All of the code is there for you. You seem to know what you're talking about, too, since you're able to state how long it should take to implement a feature, and how to prioritize them.

A web browser is a huge and complicated monster. Considering how solidly Google has built Chrome (see the pwn2own contest where no one knew how to hack it?), I think calling them amateurs is completely ungrounded in any fact, and just seems to be the opinion of a few guys who don't really have any idea what they're talking about.

Yes, I'm looking at you.

I guess you are a developer...

I am just stating the fact that of all browsers that run under Windows 7, only two do not properly support Windows 7: Chrome and Firefox. You can talk about how great Chrome is for as long as you want to, but that won't change that fact!

I am not a developer and I do not think that open source development is the best dev model out there...

I know many developers which showed me how easy it is to implement AeroPeek....

I hate the Aero peek for tabs in the browsers. I don't want to peek on my tabs from the task bar. It's just irritating. If it's an option which is switched off by default, I am all for it. Good thing Chrome isn't even going to support it. So I can take a deep breath. *sigh*

Opera and Safari are much older and developed than Chrome. Chrome's first public release was <2 years ago, Safari > 7 and Opera ~14. I expect the Chrome devs to focus more on getting the basic feature set (and their own goals) done before working on fluff.

P.S. No, I don't use Windows (any version).

If you don't use Windows then of course you shouldn't care about AeroPeek.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!