Recommended Posts

AeroPeek does offer great functionality. I am surprised nobody here sees it..

I give up...I don't want to continue arguing with Google fanboys. It is pointless

You make some wild assumptions. I don't use chrome. If I did, I'd rather the developer work on more important features than eye candy.

Then it is time to lock the thread.

+1

I don't like being insulted by people who don't even know me. This is getting ridiculous.

I didn't insult you, but you however couldn't refrain from throwing insults at me.

AeroPeek can be globally disabled. I linked to the instructions earlier in this thread. I have a feeling we'll all be bored of it in a few months as I don't see how it increases efficiency. When XP first came out it had all sorts of extra eye-candy enabled and it only took me a few months before I came to the conclusion that almost all of them can be disabled.

AeroPeek is great for Windows Explorer, MSN, Word, etc.. But When you have dozen's of tabs open in IE/Chrome/Whatever it's just annoying.

Isn't Chromium open source product? So, if you want all those fancy feature for Windows, you can help implementing them. Otherwise not all people are paid for working on Chromium/Chrome.

So you are saying that Google has no influence on the project? Do you really believe that Google isnt paying developers to write Chrome? Sure there are people developing for Chrome on a voluntary basis, but the majority is getting paid (directly or indirectly) by Google.

Aero Peek is a killer feature. Chrome will become unusable on Windows 7 when they remove it.

Chrome is a great browser and not having Aero Peek won't change that. Having said that, I won't be using it as my default browser till this feature gets properly implemented.

Overall, there is a lot of drama in this thread for a minor eye-candy feature. If this is an essential item for some of you then just use another browser.

AeroPeek can be globally disabled. I linked to the instructions earlier in this thread. I have a feeling we'll all be bored of it in a few months as I don't see how it increases efficiency. When XP first came out it had all sorts of extra eye-candy enabled and it only took me a few months before I came to the conclusion that almost all of them can be disabled.

That doesn't prevent each tab from being shown as a window.

I thought the idea of tabs in the first place was to prevent them from showing as separate windows. And we're back to SDI-ish MDI.

So stop pretending Chrome doesn't "support" or "fully support" Windows 7. It supports Windows 7, and it supports Aero Peek. Windows 7 does not dictate how a browser should use the AeroPeek feature; the only one dictating arbitrary rules here is you.

Dude, the Chrome developer said it himself. He needs to rewrite lots of code to support it. This means that he did indeed say that they don't support it correctly, and that this won't happen until Chrome 6.

The problem is the guy who attacked the developer and twisted his words, only to later complain that people who called him out on it were attacking him...

That doesn't prevent each tab from being shown as a window.

I thought the idea of tabs in the first place was to prevent them from showing as separate windows. And we're back to SDI-ish MDI.

Yeah, I agree. I would like to see more options to customize how it appears. I fear that those tabs are displayed because neophytes would start to think that the screen they were working on was lost (when really it just wasn't the focused tab). Most normal people barely have a grip on how tabs work and I often see non-technical people with the same content in 8 different tabs because they don't know how to find it again once a new window was opened by a link they clicked on. I mean, you click a tab, how difficult is that? Apparently, for most regular users, it is.

Dude, the Chrome developer said it himself. He needs to rewrite lots of code to support it. This means that he did indeed say that they don't support it correctly, and that this won't happen until Chrome 6.

The problem is the guy who attacked the developer and twisted his words, only to later complain that people who called him out on it were attacking him...

I didn't twist anyone's words. I just stated the facts. It seems to me that you probably cannot comprehend that. Maybe I should've been more clear in my statement before.

And yes, not delivering this feature is totally inacceptable. I found the developers answer unprofessional and I said it..

I didn't twist anyone's words. I just stated the facts. It seems to me that you probably cannot comprehend that. Maybe I should've been more clear in my statement before.

And yes, not delivering this feature is totally inacceptable. I found the developers answer unprofessional and I said it..

So your false accusations and unfounded insinuations against the Chrome devs are called "facts", but whenever anyone points out the obvious, it's called "personal insults"? :whistle:

Aero Peek is a killer feature. Chrome will become unusable on Windows 7 when they remove it.

In which way will Chrome become unusable on Windows 7 if I may ask...?

Have you perhaps not noticed this bar at the top yet?

chrome-pin-tab-2.png

This amazing thing magically allows you to switch windows without any need for preview bars of any kind. (Y)

In which way will Chrome become unusable on Windows 7 if I may ask...?

Have you perhaps not noticed this bar at the top yet?

chrome-pin-tab-2.png

This amazing thing magically allows you to switch windows without any need for preview bars of any kind. (Y)

This works as long as you can identify the favicons of the website. In reality, many websites have no favicons and even if they do it's hard to recognize unless they are very familiar like Facebook, Google, Bing or Neowin. So, Aero Peek is the easiest way to identify the tab that I want to visit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!