Which lens would be the better bet?


Recommended Posts

Hi all!

I recently got a Nikon D3000 as my first DSLR, and it came with an 18-55mm VR AF-S lens. The camera is working great, but I also need a good zoom-telephoto lens. I'm looking at two different lenses, but I'm having difficulty making a final decision.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/486717-USA/Nikon_2166_AF_S_DX_VR_Zoom_Nikkor.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/207359-USA/Nikon_1928_AF_Zoom_Nikkor_70_300mm.html

Now obviously, the 70-300mm will be able to provide more zoom, and is cheaper. However, the 55-200mm has built in vibration reduction, which is a tempting feature for me.

I typically do a lot of outdoor photography, so I imagine the shutter speed would be fast enough where any vibration wouldn't be picked up. However, I was wondering if the camera would be more sensitive to vibration at the higher focal lengths (250 to 300mm). In addition, I occasionally do some indoor photography (sometimes when flash is not allowed), so the shutter speed would be significantly slower. I also rarely use a tripod unless I'm doing long exposure shots.

So I'm wondering if in my situation would the higher focal length of the 70-300mm lens outweighs the loss of the VR function.

On a side note - I'm aware that the 70-300mm lens won't autofocus on the D3000. I've been using manual focus since about two days after I got the camera, so the lack of autofocus isn't really a con for me.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/891442-which-lens-would-be-the-better-bet/
Share on other sites

Well it all boils down to:

Longer Focal length or VR

For shiny outdoors @ 300mm isn't a problem, but for a grar day non vr 300mm will probably be slow and blurry ( unless you up teh ISO ).

I'd go for longer focal length. In the end, you can place the camera on a tripod, but you can't add an extra 100mm to a 200mm.

If you're only choosing between those 2 lenses, I'd go with the 55-200. If you'd be willing to get the 70-300VR lens, then I'd suggest going for that one. The 70-300VR is around $550 though. I have the 55-200VR right now and it's definitely a great lens when I have good lighting. I am looking to also get a 70-300VR lens though just for the extra reach.

I typically do a lot of outdoor photography, so I imagine the shutter speed would be fast enough where any vibration wouldn't be picked up. However, I was wondering if the camera would be more sensitive to vibration at the higher focal lengths (250 to 300mm). In addition, I occasionally do some indoor photography (sometimes when flash is not allowed), so the shutter speed would be significantly slower. I also rarely use a tripod unless I'm doing long exposure shots.

As a rule of thumb it's always good to have 1/focal length for your shutter speed to cut blur.

So focal length of 70mm try to have at least 1/70 sec. Focal length of 300mm try to have 1/300 sec. shutter speed.

Why not get this: http://www.bhphotovi...0mm_f_2_8G.html

Haha, jokes aside, you should also consider this: http://www.bhphotovi...5_6_APO_DG.html It'll give you AF and 1:2 "Macro"

Oh, and the exact same 70-300 lens you posted is also listed at a lower price http://www.bhphotovi...r_70_300mm.html

As a rule of thumb it's always good to have 1/focal length for your shutter speed to cut blur.

So focal length of 70mm try to have at least 1/70 sec. Focal length of 300mm try to have 1/300 sec. shutter speed.

Did not know that! (Y) (Y)

Why not get this: http://www.bhphotovi...0mm_f_2_8G.html

Haha, jokes aside, you should also consider this: http://www.bhphotovi...5_6_APO_DG.html It'll give you AF and 1:2 "Macro"

Oh, and the exact same 70-300 lens you posted is also listed at a lower price http://www.bhphotovi...r_70_300mm.html

Wow

$ 2,299.00 And not even free shipping :p

+1 on the Sigma

Having owned the 55-200 VR for about a year an a half, it's a great lens. I think our situations are a bit different, but I can try and help. I personally would never buy a zoom lens without VR. It is really really helpful for getting nice sharp shots without a tripod (most occasions). So, for the VR reason alone, I would go with the 55-200 VR over the 70-300. However, if you do like to do a lot of outdoor photography, the 300mm might come in handy. You can always move closer I guess. I think the ability to autofocus would be nice to have though too. Anyway, good luck with you search.

Here's a couple "outdoor" sets on flickr I shot with only my 55-200 VR and D40.

Gallery - Frozen Morning

Gallery - Marina

Thanks for all the advice guys. I've decided on the Sigma. Until this afternoon I was leaning towards the 200mm VR, but then I went up to a local shop to pick up a camera bag and the guy pointed out a rather good fact to me:

VR is only useful in low light situations, such as being indoors (I already knew that), but chances are if you're indoors you're taking a picture of someone/something in action, in which case VR wouldn't do much anyway.

I knew that VR didn't do much for action, but I never actually put two-and-two together and realized that in most situations where you'd need VR, it wouldn't work anyway. So with that in mind, Sigma it is. Thanks everyone!

I also agree that autofocus is definitely a plus to have. While I'm sure you can get by without it, it makes things a lot simpler and you'll have one less thing to worry about when trying to capture your image.

?

Actually, could anyone tell me the difference between the Sigma lens and this one:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/550953-REG/Tamron_AF017NII_700_70_300mm_f_4_5_6_Di_LD.html#features

They both have the same range, a macro switch, and AF compatible with the D3000, but the Tamron is $40 cheaper. Is there any advantage the Sigma would have over the Tamron?

Sigma

58mm

f/Stop Range

4-22/5.6-32

Minimum Focus Distance

59.7" (37.4" in macro)

Magnification

1:2 (in macro)

Zoom/Focus Control

Two-Touch

Angle of View

34-8°

Groups/Elements

10/14

Length

4.7" (119mm)

Maximum Diameter

2.9" (74mm)

Weight

1.3 lb (584g)

TamronFilter Size

62mm

f/Stop Range

4-22

Minimum Focus Distance

4.9' (1.5 m)

3.1' (0.95 m) in macro mode

Maximum Magnification

1:2

Angle of View

34 to 8°

Groups/Elements

13/9

Length

4.6" (117mm)

Maximum Diameter

3" (76mm)

Weight

1 lb (458g)

For specs, you'll notice "groups/elements" on the Sigma is 14/10, probably glass/blades elements IIRC, more glass inside and/or higher quality glass. I for one owned that exact same tamron, feels cheap like hell, BUT gets the job done. Sharpness @ 300mm is NOT tack sharp, but with proper post processing it give out nice images (again @300m). In the end, you get Cheap and long reach :)

There several lens review sites eg. dpreview that you can check out ( not sure if they have that specific sigma lens, but hey, google is teh limit)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!