Recommended Posts

I have a Nikon D40... I really enjoy using it when I can and for the money it's a great starter camera for anyone. The menus are easy to use; it's very versatile, it's light, its small and just all around fun to use. The only thing I have found with it is the limitation of lenses available at reasonable prices. I currently own the standard 18-55mm & Nikon AF 50mm. Problem is that the D40 does not have a built in motor so can only Auto-Focus on lenses with the motor built in (AF-S). I don't want to spend nearly £500 for the 50mm AF-S as that's totally out of my price range.

I am very much looking at going with Canon because of one of the main points that the motor is built into the body rather than lenses. This gives me great freedom for choice of lenses I presume. I feel very limited with my D40 and with the lenses I've got and the shots I would like to take I haven't got much choice really. I'm looking to sell my current setup and upgrade to something above the D40.

I am really just looking for another entry-level DSLR that gives me much more choice. If it's a Nikon it will need to be AF-S though. I would like to have HD Video recording, just as an option really but if that's out of my price range then that's cool. Please give me some ideas people just need something else to have a think about.

My budget = £400-600.

Thanks all!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/896302-time-to-upgrade-from-d40/
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly... the Canon does NOT have built in motors. That was why Nikon got rid of it in the D40, to match the size of the canon rebels, I think. (somebody correct/verify this for me?)

But don't expect too big of an upgrade going from a 400 pound entry level camera to a 2 year new 400 pound entry level.

I have a Nikon D40... I really enjoy using it when I can and for the money it's a great starter camera for anyone. The menus are easy to use; it's very versatile, it's light, its small and just all around fun to use. The only thing I have found with it is the limitation of lenses available at reasonable prices. I currently own the standard 18-55mm & Nikon AF 50mm. Problem is that the D40 does not have a built in motor so can only Auto-Focus on lenses with the motor built in (AF-S). I don't want to spend nearly ?500 for the 50mm AF-S as that's totally out of my price range.

I am very much looking at going with Canon because of one of the main points that the motor is built into the body rather than lenses. This gives me great freedom for choice of lenses I presume. I feel very limited with my D40 and with the lenses I've got and the shots I would like to take I haven't got much choice really. I'm looking to sell my current setup and upgrade to something above the D40.

I am really just looking for another entry-level DSLR that gives me much more choice. If it's a Nikon it will need to be AF-S though. I would like to have HD Video recording, just as an option really but if that's out of my price range then that's cool. Please give me some ideas people just need something else to have a think about.

My budget = ?400-600.

Thanks all!

I thought THe more expensive nikon cameras have built in motors. The nikon d40 doesnt have a built in motor to save money.

Hmmm maybe Im confused.. Its not so much about upgrade really its choice. The d40 has such limited choice of lenses for good prices that its a hard time searching for ones that are compatible.

I can easily get a D90 body for ?500.. is that not much of a difference ?

HUGE difference. The D90 shares the same sensor as the nikon D300s, a pro camera. They're not even comparable.

So exactly what "choice" of lenses are you looking for, anyway? You complained about the 50mm f1.4 being too expensive, but what about the 35mm f1.8? It's about $190.

A D90 body would be a better choice than another entry-level camera. AFAIK Nikon and Canon do not have built in motors in all of their range, Sony and Pentax do, and I'm not sure about Olympus.

The D40/60/3000/5000 are the only nikon cameras withOUT a built in motor. D70 80 90 100 200 300 700 1 2 3 etc all have built in motors.

But again, exactly what lenses are you looking for? AF-S only nikon cameras have been around for 4 years now, and the lens range is quite good for Nikon brand lenses and 3rd party lenses.

Im looking ideally for a wide angle lenses primarily for Landscape shots. The 50mm is of course of out the question, the 18-55mm can do an ok job but really more suited for general use. I would like to totally ditch using the 18-55mm. Im into my long exposure and night time shots.

Maybe I am just looking at things the wrong way, I just thought seeing as the D40 is the lowest entry level nikon that it would be majorly limited.

The D40/60/3000/5000 are the only nikon cameras withOUT a built in motor. D70 80 90 100 200 300 700 1 2 3 etc all have built in motors.

OK, I think what I said was ambiguous, I meant to say that Nikon and Canon have some cameras that do not have motors and others that do "Not all of their range has built-in motors" would have been more adequate, while Sony and Pentax have built-in motors in all of their cameras.

a higher quality lens like a 17-55 f2.8?

Are you talking about the Tamron or Sigma 17-50 f/2.8? Or is there a Nikon brand 17-55 f/2.8?

I've been seriously considering replacing my Sony 18-70 f/3.5-5.6 kit lens with the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8

I'm talking about either the tamron 17-50 f2.8 or nikon 17-55 f2.8. I own the tamron and it's pretty good. They have a new VC (vibration compensation) version that i hear is awesome for about $600. The nikon version is ~$1500.

OK, I think what I said was ambiguous, I meant to say that Nikon and Canon have some cameras that do not have motors and others that do "Not all of their range has built-in motors" would have been more adequate, while Sony and Pentax have built-in motors in all of their cameras.

ah, ok.

Well I done some research like I should of in the start and found this post on DPreview forums.

Crossposting this from an old thread in the D40/D80 forum: Just to show that the lens choices for the D40/D40x are not as limited as many believe. Actually there is a selection of 23 Nikon AF-S lenses and 17 Sigma lenses (16 HSM and the 80-400 OS) that are fully compatible with the D40 and D40x AF and a FL range from 10mm to 800mm.

Regards

Walter

Nikon AF-S lenses:

12-24/4 DX

17-55/2.8 DX

18-55/3.5-5.6 DX I

18-55/3.5-5.6 DX II

18-70 DX

18-135 DX

18-200 DX VR

55-200 DX

17-35/2.8 AF-S

24-85/3.5-4.5 AF-S

24-120 AF-S VR

28-70/2.8

70-200/2.8 VR

70-300 VR

105/2.8 VR

200/2 VR

200-400/4 VR

300/2.8 VR

300/4 AF-S

400/2.8 AF-S

500/4 AF-S

600/4 AF-S

Sigma HSM lenses:

10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC

12-24mm F4.5-5.6

17-35mm F2.8-4 DG

50-500mm F4-6.3 DG

50-150mm F2.8 EX DC HSM

70-200mm F2.8 DG MACRO

80-400mm F4.5-5.6

100-300mm F4 DG

120-300mm F2.8 DG

300-800mm F5.6 DG

14mm F2.8 EX

30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM

150mm F2.8 EX DG

180mm F3.5 EX DG

300mm EX DG

500mm EX DG

800mm f5.6 EX DG

Maybe there is a lot more choice of compatible lenses than I thought. I think its that I just like buying new electronics all the time!

Maybe there is a lot more choice of compatible lenses than I thought.

Exactly. :p

i think its that I just like buying new electronics all the time!

well photography is the place for that then, you just gotta know where to spend it so it's not a waste :)

Thanks for your tips crazy! Another D40 thread wont hurt anyone lol. I will be investing in a wide lens very soon. Got some great countryside around me so will be good to capture some of it!

Now Im thinking wide Im also thinking about a Fish-eye also... got my eyes on a few. I know fish-eyes are really all for effect I have a few ideas to experiment with though.

eh, I'm really anti-fish eye. I think they're silly.

However, in regards to the wide angle, I have to say I highly recommend Tokina. My tokina 12-24mm F4 is great and they also have a 11-16mm f2.8 which is even better. And, sigh, they also make a fish eye :p

I guess I go for realism in my photos, so that's why I'm not a big fan of fish eye. Even distortion at 12mm bothers me and I was looking for away to fix it last night :p

Also, I feel that the lens is pretty limiting, at least for my uses. It's all personal preference. :)

Also, I feel that the lens is pretty limiting, at least for my uses. It's all personal preference. :)

Its very true you are limited with the fish eye, its really a gimmick. It can be used though for some great landscape wide shots. I love the way it warps rooms as well, can see me experimenting with some Panoramics.

I may get one of the below though with another lens.

Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye

http://cgi.ebay.co.u...5644cc4fffdff25

Peleng 8mm f3.5 Fisheye

http://www.rugift.co..._nikon_lens.htm

I've read great reviews on the both but not really seen much difference between them to pay more for the peleng. Will more than likely go for the Samyang.

I love the way it warps rooms as well, can see me experimenting with some Panoramics.

Maybe I suck with post processing (OK, actually I REALLY suck with post processing) but I'd think the distortion caused by fish eye lenses won't work well with stitching panoramics. Ive had trouble even with my super wide at 12mm, let alone a fish eye!

  • 3 weeks later...

Maybe I suck with post processing (OK, actually I REALLY suck with post processing) but I'd think the distortion caused by fish eye lenses won't work well with stitching panoramics. Ive had trouble even with my super wide at 12mm, let alone a fish eye!

Check this out:

http://fiveprime.org/hivemind/Tags/fisheye,panorama

I just love how some of the pics look I know some look over the top but I just love the distortion it gives... I think I may swap my 50mm 1.4 for the 35mm 1.4 AF-S as I can then use auto-focus! :D.. Also will probably get he Sigma 8mm still.

Hmmm maybe Im confused.. Its not so much about upgrade really its choice. The d40 has such limited choice of lenses for good prices that its a hard time searching for ones that are compatible.

I can easily get a D90 body for £500.. is that not much of a difference ?

I'm looking to get a D90 and I'm saving for it at the moment. If I could get it for £500, I'd be able to get it a bit sooner. Where did you see it at that price?

Cheapest I've seen is Jessops at £610 with a £60 send in refund from Nikon...

By the way, most of those pics you linked to are stitched together panoramic, I don't think you can really get a lens which is THAT wide! At least not for less than thousands of pounds.

I'm looking to get a D90 and I'm saving for it at the moment. If I could get it for ?500, I'd be able to get it a bit sooner. Where did you see it at that price?

Cheapest I've seen is Jessops at ?610 with a ?60 send in refund from Nikon...

By the way, most of those pics you linked to are stitched together panoramic, I don't think you can really get a lens which is THAT wide! At least not for less than thousands of pounds.

Well ?500 was a bit low but you can get it here for ?549 + ?7.99 delivery which ain't bad at all!

http://www.camerabox.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=5761&gclid=CIHj_6yI3qECFZFh4wod7CsPKQ

I am looking more into compatible wide lenses for my D40.. in a couple years when I have more experience I will look into upgrading my body.

Not bad at all, I'd found it for less than that but the reviews for the site I found it on were hit and miss, this site seems more reputable, thanks :)

BTW, does "European Stock Therefore No Cashback Just Cheap Prices"

Mean that I wouldn't be able to claim the £60 cashback from Nikon?

(sorry for hijacking your thread a bit :blush:)

Not bad at all, I'd found it for less than that but the reviews for the site I found it on were hit and miss, this site seems more reputable, thanks :)

BTW, does "European Stock Therefore No Cashback Just Cheap Prices"

Mean that I wouldn't be able to claim the ?60 cashback from Nikon?

(sorry for hijacking your thread a bit :blush:)

Basically you wouldn't need to claim the cashback, they have either already done it or you are unable too probably explaining the cheaper price! lol.. thats my guess anyways. Seems like they offer 5 year warranty as well!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!