Recommended Posts

Is anyone else having issues with the tab titles?

Example:

post-2-1291730397589.png

The tab title doesn't change with the page title (this happens on most sites). Sometimes reused tabs keep the old domain title while I'm somewhere else too? :p

The in-content UI change is a start, but it looks pretty bland compared to the mockups. I'm hoping we can start getting more eye candy after beta 8 wraps up.

Is anyone else having issues with the tab titles?

Example:

post-2-1291730397589.png

The tab title doesn't change with the page title (this happens on most sites). Sometimes reused tabs keep the old domain title while I'm somewhere else too? :p

I haven't had this problem, but I saw it in bugzilla yesterday - Bug 616916. It's currently unconfirmed, so maybe posting your screenshot there will get it more notice?

Also, don't forget to try in Safe Mode or with a new profile. ;)

Is anyone else having issues with the tab titles?

Example:

post-2-1291730397589.png

The tab title doesn't change with the page title (this happens on most sites). Sometimes reused tabs keep the old domain title while I'm somewhere else too? :p

have you tried disabling your stylish scripts?

maybe one of them is conflicting

So a bunch of the Google guys working on Chrome have found a pretty fatal flaw* in the current WebSocket protocol, and it's going to require some breaking changes to the foundation to get it into a usable state.

And because of the time/schedule, those changes won't make Firefox 4, and as such WebSockets support will be disabled for the final release. I think this is a good example of not rushing into supporting a spec too early, multiple versions of Chrome have shipped with WebSockets support enabled, some incompatible with other versions of Chrome, and all with this flaw.

* With a correctly formatted response, you can trick buggy proxies into thinking any random bit of data comes from another site, e.g. you could overwrite Google's Analytics code for every user on the proxy.

A new performance tracker landed in the latest nightly, it records when the app was started and how long it takes for it to actually launch.

190075043t.png

Obviously it'll become more useful over time, I'm surprised it only took 4 seconds to start on my Mac (considering it has 2GB of RAM and I have like 30 tabs open in multiple TabCandy groups)

Edit: And it just got backed out due to crashes :laugh:

AWFY's with kraken and v8 bench (updated till Dec 8) : http://www.arewefastyet.com/awfy2.php

Strange; this makes it seem like V8 doesn't have Crankshaft enabled? That should bring it close to Mozilla's TM+JM scores on Kraken. There's a huge difference.

It's strange because V8 already have this feature supported in the latest builds that AWFY should cover in that graph.

V8 should also receive a bump on v8bench, and be the current winner on Sunspider once this optimizing compiler is enabled.

Strange; this makes it seem like V8 doesn't have Crankshaft enabled? That should bring it close to Mozilla's TM+JM scores on Kraken. There's a huge difference.

It's strange because V8 already have this feature supported in the latest builds that AWFY should cover in that graph.

V8 should also receive a bump on v8bench, and be the current winner on Sunspider once this optimizing compiler is enabled.

It's barely been out a day! Plus, it's only in specific developer builds, give it a little time to mature (and appear in AWFY)

(Don't get me wrong though, looks like a great development)

Spot the changed default as of today's nightly:

post-1302-12919053103213.png

(OS X default theme with default toolbar settings)

I was removing the home button entirely.

(Not saying that's what should have been done. I read over the bug page too, so I understand why, and agree with just moving it.)

EDIT: Are they really going to connect the home and bookmark buttons together?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!