Super Mario Galaxy 2


Recommended Posts

Who else got their copies today? (I live in NZ so today may be a day early for some of you's, not sure)

Played for a couple of hours, got all the stars in the first galaxy. Like the first, this is my ultimate game, it's just so so fun.

Nothing can compete in terms of charm and playability imo. Well deserving of the multiple 100% scores it has been receiving.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/903742-super-mario-galaxy-2/
Share on other sites

Still not out until next month over here, will be buying it when it comes out though by the looks of things.

Damn that's harsh! I'd definitely recommend it, played more with my girlfriend last night (i never knew she was a completion freak! she has to get every single thing!) and was a blast. The two player mode has been slightly improved but still manages to just be single player with a little help (which i like). I can't believe Nintendo can still come up with original ideas for levels some of the worlds are so clever and feel so fresh it's like playing Super Mario 64 for the first time all over again.

100 Stars in now, seems not too many people here are playing it yet? Or maybe just too engrossed by it to come online!? :laugh:

There's a few nice surprises latter on in the game, not gonna ruin any, but included is a lovely throwback to SM64 which comes along in one form or another.

Anyone know if there's any point in collecting coins or do they just stack up for the sake of, ermm, well, stacking up?

Right now I can use them on the home ship to buy 5 dice to roll, but there's no point in this, as you can only win either 1 star or some lives and I have never even come close to needing any extra lives on top of the ones I gather just playing normally and receiving in the mail. Got a couple of thousand saved up I'm hoping at the end there is something I can spend em on or some kind of big saver achievement reward thing.

100 Stars in now, seems not too many people here are playing it yet? Or maybe just too engrossed by it to come online!? :laugh:

There's a few nice surprises latter on in the game, not gonna ruin any, but included is a lovely throwback to SM64 which comes along in one form or another.

Anyone know if there's any point in collecting coins or do they just stack up for the sake of, ermm, well, stacking up?

Right now I can use them on the home ship to buy 5 dice to roll, but there's no point in this, as you can only win either 1 star or some lives and I have never even come close to needing any extra lives on top of the ones I gather just playing normally and receiving in the mail. Got a couple of thousand saved up I'm hoping at the end there is something I can spend em on or some kind of big saver achievement reward thing.

I have no clue how many stars I have... I think I just beat world 2 (bowsers castle?). I feel like I want to stop moving forward and go back to get the missing stars (not sure how to find the ? ones).. overall though I am really enjoying this game..

Damn that's harsh! I'd definitely recommend it, played more with my girlfriend last night (i never knew she was a completion freak! she has to get every single thing!) and was a blast. The two player mode has been slightly improved but still manages to just be single player with a little help (which i like). I can't believe Nintendo can still come up with original ideas for levels some of the worlds are so clever and feel so fresh it's like playing Super Mario 64 for the first time all over again.

Two player mode makes it too easy imo, with the way 2p can freeze enemies.

I have no clue how many stars I have... I think I just beat world 2 (bowsers castle?). I feel like I want to stop moving forward and go back to get the missing stars (not sure how to find the ? ones).. overall though I am really enjoying this game..

The ? stars are usually hungry luma ones, or down a warp pipe.

I think the whole game is too damn easy, at the start you get 5 1-ups then there are 2 more to be found on the Mario spaceship which is a little annoying.

A lot of the levels have been recycled from Super Mario Galaxy, which is a real shame. I've got 19 stars now I think, on the 3rd world- played it for about 5 or so hours.

I think the whole game is too damn easy, at the start you get 5 1-ups then there are 2 more to be found on the Mario spaceship which is a little annoying.

A lot of the levels have been recycled from Super Mario Galaxy, which is a real shame. I've got 19 stars now I think, on the 3rd world- played it for about 5 or so hours.

But considering that's 19/242. Since I think there is 50 stars till the game final. Then 70 more. Then 120 Green stars. (Luigi?) And then 2 unlockable big final stars. Its 121 more than Galaxy 1 so.

But considering that's 19/242. Since I think there is 50 stars till the game final. Then 70 more. Then 120 Green stars. (Luigi?) And then 2 unlockable big final stars. Its 121 more than Galaxy 1 so.

That doesn't make it difficult- just longer.

Yea I don't get why reviewers are saying this game is so tough. It's way easier than NSMB too me, i'm now 110 stars in and have only had trouble with maybe one or two of them so far. Almost every level can be beat first go, apart from some of the one life boss battles (grrrrrr), people must just be ****** at games these days as they are mostly so easy compared to what they used to be.

Yea I don't get why reviewers are saying this game is so tough. It's way easier than NSMB too me, i'm now 110 stars in and have only had trouble with maybe one or two of them so far. Almost every level can be beat first go, apart from some of the one life boss battles (grrrrrr), people must just be ****** at games these days as they are mostly so easy compared to what they used to be.

I definitely think that's the case- games are getting easier. If we go back and play Super Mario Bros. 3, I'm sure many people on here will find it much more difficult than any other game available at the moment.

I definitely think that's the case- games are getting easier. If we go back and play Super Mario Bros. 3, I'm sure many people on here will find it much more difficult than any other game available at the moment.

For sure. I don't think this is entirely a bad thing, definitely games are now longer and have more content so it may take you as long as an old game you died on 100 times just to get through a new one without dying once.

It does help with frustration but I also think there is absolutely nothing better than the feeling of accomplishment when you finally do something you've been trying for hours or even days straight. No epic cinematics or life like gfx can mimic that feeling. Movies are movies and games are games because they are not the same thing, although many games (quick time events grrrrrr) are becoming close and closer to being movies I don't see the point!

**** I got carried away, more than slightly off topic lol. Back to Mario.

I love the two player mode in galaxy 2 so much! I can see how it would be too easy for most but my girlfriend would get no more than ten stars by herself. With me helping she may actually have a chance at beating the last boss and we both get to have a blast! I love seeing how she tackles some of the gameplay scenarios that I'm just so used to from playing games all my life. Things that seem so chill to me (rotating platforms, people chasing you etc.) make her scream in terror LOL

  • 1 month later...

Just started this the other day...And I sat there with a giant smile on my face the entire time playing! Had someone seen me, they would have thought I lost my mind. It was like I was a kid on christmas day.

I have to say Shigeru Miyamoto is a F#@$%# genius.

Nearing the end of this game I think (still have plenty of 2nd stars and comet stars left) and I have to say that some of these levels are just crazy difficult. I cannot even say how long it took me to beat the one level where you slide down the tree. Such a great game I def might go back and play SMG1 as I completely skipped that when it came out.

Nearing the end of this game I think (still have plenty of 2nd stars and comet stars left) and I have to say that some of these levels are just crazy difficult. I cannot even say how long it took me to beat the one level where you slide down the tree. Such a great game I def might go back and play SMG1 as I completely skipped that when it came out.

I got stuck on "The Perfect Run" or star 242, so I went back and finished SMG1 - 100%. Luigi's Purple Coins - aahhhh dammit I hated that level, but I finally got it. :)

I still cannot beat the final level, I grab 99 men and usually get to the robots that fire the red rings and die. I've given up... :(

I got stuck on "The Perfect Run" or star 242, so I went back and finished SMG1 - 100%. Luigi's Purple Coins - aahhhh dammit I hated that level, but I finally got it. :)

I still cannot beat the final level, I grab 99 men and usually get to the robots that fire the red rings and die. I've given up... :(

Damn! Looks like I got a hell of a long way to go! Only 41 stars at the moment.

But on the bright side, I still got a long way to go! :woot:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!