Third Office for Mac 2011 Beta Reveals New Icons, Splash Screens, more


Recommended Posts

Here are some screenshots of Office 2011; it definitely has more 'teh snappier', very fast and stable, I definitely would purchase it once it comes out:

http://cid-1f0dd001849fd688.photos.live.com/self.aspx/Office^_2011

What I love the most is very Mac like it is - it no longer stands out like a sore thumb like previous versions. No problems when opening up docx files, outlook is really fast. Over all it is a wonderful suite - hopefully we'll see it being released soon :)

Here are some screenshots of Office 2011; it definitely has more 'teh snappier', very fast and stable, I definitely would purchase it once it comes out:

http://cid-1f0dd0018...px/Office^_2011

What I love the most is very Mac like it is - it no longer stands out like a sore thumb like previous versions. No problems when opening up docx files, outlook is really fast. Over all it is a wonderful suite - hopefully we'll see it being released soon :)

I notice those are shots of Beta 5, which means it will probably be leaked soon. The splash screens appear to have been altered a bit, too.

I notice those are shots of Beta 5, which means it will probably be leaked soon. The splash screens appear to have been altered a bit, too.

Yeah, I got a case of the guilts and have quickly deleted it off my machine lol

It was very fast, and hopefully we'll see it being released within the next 3-4months - it'll make a great early Christmas/Graduation present.

They?re actually working their asses off really hard for this version, eh? But they had a LOT to catch up. I mean, interface-wise, graphics-wise and optimization-wise.

Now, there?s still room for optimization (64-bit, 100% Cocoa if it?s not that already), and there?s still no QuickParts in Word... strange :p

They?re actually working their asses off really hard for this version, eh? But they had a LOT to catch up. I mean, interface-wise, graphics-wise and optimization-wise.

Now, there?s still room for optimization (64-bit, 100% Cocoa if it?s not that already), and there?s still no QuickParts in Word... strange :p

I think the biggest issue they have is that they don't do updates often enough. On the Windows side of things Messenger gets updated 2 or 3 times between each Office release. MacBU only updates Messenger for Mac maybe once, if we're lucky, between Office releases. Not enough developers, perhaps?

It's not like it's not in their best interest to keep up to date, even if it is a rival platform. The worse their alternative products are, the more likely Mac users are going to switch to open source or other alternatives like Adium and OpenOffice.

the new beta is even slower then the last, and by like a MILE too.. soo slow. typing litterally is laggy.

Just out of curiosity, do you have the system specifications? I've noticed some laggy behaviour but I'm wondering whether it has to do with Microsoft tripping over bugs/poor performance in the OpenGL stack which traces back to the graphics card when it comes to some of the effects that Microsoft is using; Core Animation I have a guess they're using for that cool 'flip' effect with the template windows :)

Rumour has it that 10.6.5 will include updated nVidia drivers so hopefully that'll fix up those performance issues (from the Valve engineer on their forum) - so maybe it'll be a situation 'wait and see' - Microsoft could be waiting for Apple to release some updates to address some of the performance issues.

Just out of curiosity, do you have the system specifications? I've noticed some laggy behaviour but I'm wondering whether it has to do with Microsoft tripping over bugs/poor performance in the OpenGL stack which traces back to the graphics card when it comes to some of the effects that Microsoft is using; Core Animation I have a guess they're using for that cool 'flip' effect with the template windows :)

Rumour has it that 10.6.5 will include updated nVidia drivers so hopefully that'll fix up those performance issues (from the Valve engineer on their forum) - so maybe it'll be a situation 'wait and see' - Microsoft could be waiting for Apple to release some updates to address some of the performance issues.

Laptop

model: Late 2006 Macbook

operating system: Mac OSX Snow Leopard 10.6.4

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2ghz

RAM: 4gb Corsair @ 667

wireless N: airport extreme

video card: Intel GMA950

sound card: Intel High Definition Audio

HDD: Seagate 320gb 7200RPM

speakers: Shure srh840 headphones, Ultimate Ears MetroFi 170

DVD/Blu Ray Drive: SuperDrive

Netbook

model: Dell Mini 10v

operating system: Mac OSX Snow Leopard 10.6.4

CPU: Atom N270 @ 1.6 ghz

RAM: 1 gb DDR Ram @ 533mhz

wireless G: Dell 1397 WLAN 802.11g ? Half mini-card

video card: Intel 945GSE UMA Graphics Media Accelerator

sound card: Intel High Definition Audio

HDD: 160gb 5400 RPM

speakers: Shure srh840 headphones, Ultimate Ears MetroFi 170

laggy on both systems. iWork runs without issue in both systems. all microsoft office releases run like crap... looks like the trend is continuing!

laggy on both systems. iWork runs without issue in both systems. all microsoft office releases run like crap... looks like the trend is continuing!

I'm not surprised about the crappy performance on the netbook but I am surprised about it on the MacBook. The performance with nVidia isn't noticeable all that much but I think it's going to remain pretty crappy since your laptop is coming to the end of its 'shelf life' according to Apple. I'm hoping that maybe 10.7 will mark a further refinement given that LLVM is really mature and possibly will become the default compiler. So as far as I see it, 10.6 marks a middle point, the Vista of the Mac world and hopefully 10.7 will bring about a further refinement with heavier integration of the new technologies that'll contribute to an over all better performance, security and reliability.

the new beta is even slower then the last, and by like a MILE too.. soo slow. typing litterally is laggy.

That sucks big time. I hope that they can find a way to speed it up before the final release. I hated Office 2008 so much that I just got rid of it, and now I'm starting to get sick of booting up Parallels every time that I want to use an Office application. Unfortunately, it's the best choice when you want speed and full feature support.

The new Messenger contact list looks terrible. :x Hardly like something that is native to Mac OS X.

Its there to mimic WLM on Windows though surely. The same could be said for Apple forcing the OSX interface in iTunes and QuickTime etc on Windows users.

Its there to mimic WLM on Windows though surely.

Undoubtedly... Doesn't change that it looks like ass on Mac OS X.

same could be said for Apple forcing the OSX interface in iTunes and QuickTime etc on Windows users.

I fail to see the relevance here. Windows has a longstanding history of inconsistent interfaces, fueled by Microsoft themselves, with a general user-base that is seemingly indifferent to it. Same can't be said of Mac OS and its user-base.

Undoubtedly... Doesn't change that it looks like ass on Mac OS X.

I fail to see the relevance here. Windows has a longstanding history of inconsistent interfaces, fueled by Microsoft themselves, with a general user-base that is seemingly indifferent to it. Same can't be said of Mac OS and its user-base.

But least these UIs are fast, you can't say the same for iTunes or Quicktime on Windows.

Same can't be said of Mac OS and its user-base.

What about the fact that Apple always seems to have a slightly different UI with iTunes when compared to the rest of Mac OS X and that Mac OS X Tiger had a mixture of brushed metal and glossy plastic? There are also various HIG violations, such as how "real world" applications are supposed to have a brushed metal look, yet most don't.

Apple is very good about consistency, for the most part, but even they don't follow their own guidelines 100% of the time.

I haven't noticed much 'slowness'. Beta 5 is pretty quick for me, there is no lagging with text input anyway.

The Messenger in Beta 4 crashed for me every time I sent a message, that doesn't happen in Beta 5 and it's pretty stable. Looks better too :)

What about the fact that Apple always seems to have a slightly different UI with iTunes when compared to the rest of Mac OS X and that Mac OS X Tiger had a mixture of brushed metal and glossy plastic? There are also various HIG violations, such as how "real world" applications are supposed to have a brushed metal look, yet most don't.

Apple is very good about consistency, for the most part, but even they don't follow their own guidelines 100% of the time.

You do realise that if you actually read the HIG (instead of relaying what others have said) there are exceptions to the general rules for particular circumstances.

Consistency has less to do with the feel and more about how it behaves; that command-q produces the same results regardless of the application. I've seen some applications ported from Windows that still use control-c and control-v for copy and paste even though Mac OS X use the command key. There are many vendors out there like that - the feel is less important when you consider that the behaviour in terms of consistency with the HIG being the more important factor.

You do realise that if you actually read the HIG (instead of relaying what others have said) there are exceptions to the general rules for particular circumstances.

Consistency has less to do with the feel and more about how it behaves; that command-q produces the same results regardless of the application. I've seen some applications ported from Windows that still use control-c and control-v for copy and paste even though Mac OS X use the command key. There are many vendors out there like that - the feel is less important when you consider that the behaviour in terms of consistency with the HIG being the more important factor.

God yes... I hate it when applications come along and they think that they can just remap the keyboard shortcuts "just because". It drives me to not even use the app in the first place.

I agree though, it's more about consistency of behaviour than anything else.

What about the fact that Apple always seems to have a slightly different UI with iTunes when compared to the rest of Mac OS X and that Mac OS X Tiger had a mixture of brushed metal and glossy plastic? There are also various HIG violations, such as how "real world" applications are supposed to have a brushed metal look, yet most don't.

Apple is very good about consistency, for the most part, but even they don't follow their own guidelines 100% of the time.

As far as I know Mac users have been complaining like crazy about iTunes' inconsistent UI, among other things. Mac OS X Tiger became a complete mess of different styles, which Apple corrected with Mac OS X Leopard and improved upon with Snow Leopard. Why? Because Mac users and developers complained so much about it. So both examples you're giving support what I'm saying about Mac users in general: They tend to set the bar higher when it comes to their OS and applications.

Obviously Mac OS X isn't 100% consistent either, but it's nowhere near as bad as the situation is (and has been for years) on Windows.

But least these UIs are fast, you can't say the same for iTunes or Quicktime on Windows.

Microsoft Office for Mac fast? You gotta be kiddin' me... Next to that the application interfaces are quirky as hell and don't respect Mac OS X standard keyboard shortcuts.

Microsoft Office for Mac fast? You gotta be kiddin' me... Next to that the application interfaces are quirky as hell and don't respect Mac OS X standard keyboard shortcuts.

Indeed, Office is quirky, slow, sluggish, whatever you want. But at LEAST I?m pretty sure they improved a lot compared to Office 2008. It?s just a pity it?s not 64-bit yet, we?ll have to wait for 2014 for this...

Just out of curiosity, what is a 64-bit Office suite going to offer over 32-bit during daily usage? Or is it just wanting to have 64-bit for the sake of having 64-bit?

It won't offer much improvements over 32-bit. Excel would gain for those who use it as a database. A company I use to work for still uses it from what I've heard for spreadsheets that should have been turned into, at the very least, Access databases. They have millions of rows. It will definitely help with performance in that. I guess VB too. But for the most part, it won't offer much performance increases.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!