Third Office for Mac 2011 Beta Reveals New Icons, Splash Screens, more


Recommended Posts

Still fail tho, I work in education and I will from time to time have a student bring in a .pages file that we can't open at all, as we have no macs on site so they have no choice but to go home and re-export the work, it just wastes people's time. All of which could be saved by Apple creating something like Microsoft have, i.e powerpoint/word viewer.

A windows compatible pages/numbers/keynote viewer is a good idea. They should have that. The kid and parents probably learned something about file formats so it wasn't a complete waste of time.

Since no one in their right mind would use iTune unless they purchased an iPod or iPhone I don't consider iTunes free. I have never had any problem with Messenger on OS X, it's not "pretty" but it's never crashed on me.

I must be crazy then. Even if I didn't have an iPhone or iPod, I would use iTunes.

Count me in on that crazy train. I used iTunes for years (on Windows, no less) before I even got an iPod of any kind, and at that point it was only because I had won it in a contest. I have never bought an iPod. Either I've gotten it through contests or back to school deals. Then when I got a Mac, continuing to use iTunes was a no-brainer.

iTunes is just very simply the best music organizer that I have ever used. Perhaps most people don't know how to set it up right, since most of its useful features are off by default. I have my iTunes automatically make a copy of any song I dump into the library to the Music folder, and from there I have it automatically organize the songs by folder structure (Artist, then Album) and then save the song files by song number and name. It also embeds the album art into all the files, and correctly tags them (and I can batch correct them if something is wrong).

From there, if I ever need to make a backup of my music, it's all in one simple folder that I can copy to a drive. Or if I have a mp3 player that simply acts as a storage device (my old iRiver H120 did that) I can just dump the folder into the root of the drive and it all shows up nice and organized in the player itself. That's right, I used to use iTunes to indirectly sync to my iRiver.

I don't see the problem here. As far as I'm concerned, whenever I see people moan about iTunes it's because they just don't know what they want it to do. If someone honestly prefers WMP for music organization, then maybe anything they say from here on out should only be taken with a grain of salt.

Also,

Since no one in their right mind would use iTune unless they purchased an iPod or iPhone I don't consider iTunes free.

Wow. Just wow. There's not much to say in response to that other than: :huh:

... iTunes is just very simply the best music organizer that I have ever used. Perhaps most people don't know how to set it up right, since most of its useful features are off by default. I have my iTunes automatically make a copy of any song I dump into the library to the Music folder, and from there I have it automatically organize the songs by folder structure (Artist, then Album) and then save the song files by song number and name. It also embeds the album art into all the files, and correctly tags them (and I can batch correct them if something is wrong) ...

And it will blow away your entire folder structure, tags and every other bit of organisation you may do. When you add new music to your computer or download new music, iTunes does not pick up on it, its performance under Windows is shabby. It's bloated and is always trying to install other software to your machine.

I would not recommend Windows Media Player though as in Windows 7 it is quite simply broken!!!!

Zune however is light and elegant, monitors your folders, and makes it easy to sync to a device and organise your music and media. iTunes is more fully featured, but this will come to the Zune software once Windows Phone 7 is out.

And it will blow away your entire folder structure, tags and every other bit of organisation you may do.

That's the exact opposite of what I just said... What are you talking about here?

When you add new music to your computer or download new music, iTunes does not pick up on it

It's not iTunes' job to be a folder monitor, and I never once thought that I would ever use such a feature. But if you really need it, I'm sure there's a plug-in for that somewhere. You're supposed to just drag and drop a folder or file into the library to initiate a copy. Simple enough.

its performance under Windows is shabby. It's bloated and is always trying to install other software to your machine.

This is something I never understood. The last PC I ever ran was a crappy P4 3.0ghz single core machine. I ran iTunes on that for years and never felt the need to complain about performance, and I have a few thousand songs in my playlist. The only thing I can remember is that scrolling would lag a bit, but most of the time my iTunes was minimized or hidden while it played music so this was not an issue for me.

If iTunes ran adequately on a POS like that, then I'm sure it runs just fine on more modern PCs these days.

If you wanna talk about bloated, we should discuss Windows Live Messenger. ;)

Since no one in their right mind would use iTune unless they purchased an iPod or iPhone I don't consider iTunes free.

Fact of the matter is that iTunes is a free product. You'd be surprised how many people use iTunes without owning a iPod, iPad or iPhone. Windows and Mac OS X users alike.

I dont see people complaining about Adobe using splash screens or mentioning that fact it's got MANY more features than pages or the fact it's a business standard for a reason. If Pages was "just as good" then I'm sure companies would buy it for their Mac users because it's so much cheaper. Our company has an active ban on Keynote because we have had so many cases of a user making a presentation in Keynote then failing to convert it before giving it to others and then no one else can edit the presentation or even re-use it. 9 out of 10 times the only reason that Keynote looks more "pretty" than Powerpoint is that they assign a designer to make the Keynote presentation and when they want a Powerpoint presentation just just assign some assistant to do it. It's like complaining that a paint brush is total **** because I can't paint as good as Leonardo DiVinci.

You don't read well do you? I already said that iWork (which includes Pages) is a much younger product and as such lacks certain advanced features Microsoft Office does have. However, the applications are much better written, have better fitting interfaces and make full use of Mac OS X' capabilities. I have no doubt the next version of iWork will catch up with Snow Leopard's new technologies as well.

The rest of your story is subjective and doesn't apply to me.

iWork is useless to 80% of the world until PC users can edit/create files in iWork format. Until then its ONLY useful in companies that are all Mac.

I have been using it just fine for the past 5 years. Even noticed the fact you can export to PDF and other popular formats such as DOC? And before you come up with the whole lay-out argument: Advanced lay-outs can cause problems even between computers running Microsoft Office simply because A) Not everyone uses the same Office version B) Not all fonts are always there.

Zune however is light and elegant/quote]

While the Zune software does perform better on Windows than iTunes I find its interface to be rather confusing and a bit too candyland-like.

And it will blow away your entire folder structure, tags and every other bit of organisation you may do.

iTunes preserves your ID3 tags, etc. without any problem. As for reorganizing your file structure, yes, it's set up to do that on purpose. You can turn that off.

And it will blow away your entire folder structure, tags and every other bit of organisation you may do.

If iTunes does that it's only because you told it to. The first time you launch the application, be it on Mac OS X or Windows, the setup wizard will ask you if you want iTunes to manage your files and folders or to do it manually yourself. It's not Apple's fault that you don't read before hitting "Next". ID3 tags are preserved.

I can't help that Apple sent me two defective iMacs before this one...

I'm going to send the second one back with Windows 7 installed on it. Thought that would make a good joke... :laugh:

ROFL that's pretty funny indeed :p

I just hope you won't waste an hour just for installing Windows 7 and making them a joke :p

But two defective iMacs... There’s a few people out there who are just out of luck with those Apple products, but I thought they were doing this on purpose. Like "hey, each time I drop my iPod on the floor it breaks, so I send it back to Apple" XD

I’m surprised you had 2 problems in a row.

Windows setup doesn't require you to sit in front of your computer looking at how the progress bar fills up...

Next to that I want to see how Windows 7 performs without screwing up my production machine.

But two defective iMacs... There’s a few people out there who are just out of luck with those Apple products, but I thought they were doing this on purpose. Like "hey, each time I drop my iPod on the floor it breaks, so I send it back to Apple" XD

I’m surprised you had 2 problems in a row.

With Apple's quality control these days it's really not that surprising...

With Apple's quality control these days it's really not that surprising...

Where is the evidence that the percentage of defects have increased? All evidence shown is the defect rate is no worse than it used to be - I'd argue it is lower when compared to the fiascos when they used PowerPC and custom chipsets that were as buggy as hell.

Where's your evidence?

Anyway, this is totally off-topic.

Having been in the 'Mac community' (if there is such a thing) since 2002 where I regularly look at Macrumors, Appleinsider, Arstechnica etc. The number of people complaining is not better or worse when compared to crappy SMP PowerPC implementation, the horrible chipset that would result in the eMac having better disk I/O than the G5 iMac, the slow death of G5 PowerMac's due to cooling defects and the iBook G3 fiasco - I'm sure there are more that can be added to the list.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!