Recommended Posts

It's time to upgrade my cell phone, my blackberry 8300 is reaching its busting point, issues starting to crop up, plus its time I finally got data on my phone. I'm looking at the EVO 4G as a replacement (I'm on ATT but would switch to sprint), but want to see your opinions on the following:

I currently use a 1st Gen IPOD touch as my portable portfolio to show people/new models, etc.

I am looking at the EVO 4G to replace both my cell and the ipod touch.

Facts:

EVO 4g has a 16bit screen (65K colors) vs Ipod/Iphone 24bit screen (16Million colors)

EVO 4g has a much larger screen.

I have briefly loaded some of my work onto a coworkers EVO, but I have not been able to spent a lot of time testing the phone to see if it would be suitable as a replacement portable portfolio, so I ask this: Anyone that shoots around here, if you have one of these phones, and you understand color profiling, resolution, bit depth, banding...etc, would you recommend this phone as a portfolio device? Do you do anything different to your work to profile it to look better on the display? The larger screen on the EVO is enough to sway me away from the higher bit-depth screen of the iphone, however image quality and color fidelity/vibrancy are very important to me on a mobile device.

So would anyone recommend the EVO as a replacement?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/908864-htc-evo-4g-as-portfolio/
Share on other sites

I would recommend it. While the iphone has a better screen, it wont be something that you would really notice. At these sizes, the screens are basically as good as they will get, at least for how we can perceive them. Also, the camera might be better, but we really don't have anything to compare both against.

In the long run, the EVO would be a better display device due to the size of the screen. It will also save you money, as the phone and service plan are cheaper than what AT&T offers.

I would recommend it. While the iphone has a better screen, it wont be something that you would really notice. At these sizes, the screens are basically as good as they will get, at least for how we can perceive them. Also, the camera might be better, but we really don't have anything to compare both against.

In the long run, the EVO would be a better display device due to the size of the screen. It will also save you money, as the phone and service plan are cheaper than what AT&T offers.

Thanks Shakey... to clarify, I really don't care about the cameras in the phone, I would use it for social networking/portfolio/sms/phone usage only, so cameras in phones mean nothing to me. All I care about really is the large screen, and looking at my ipod touch next to the EVO, the screen is huge. The 8bit depth difference is slightly noticeable, but I'm thinking that over time, I could probably easily get used to that deficit, as the larger screen is better for showing images....that and the NEXT one may have a 24bit screen, in which case it would be perfect. I was thinking of getting an IPAD for the task, but I really don't want to lug around the big tablet just to show photos.

For purely screen size, an Evo or iPad would be good.

For quality, the iPhone 4 screen has higher resolution than the Evo, and probably more accurate color reproduction as it's an IPS display.

I'm not sure which would really be better in your case, the larger screen on the Evo might make more of an impact than the higher DPI of the new iPhone.

Probably best for photo display would be an iPad, but that's a lot of money for a device you would only use for one purpose, and like you said it isn't exactly pocketable.

Yea, are you aware of the new iPhone 4 that came out on Monday? The new screen on it is epic. It has over 300 pixels per inch. It's 4x better than the previous iphone/ipod touch.

Also, I'm not sure if you care, but the EVO has an extra $10 a month charge to it because it's 4G. Just an FYI.

if you want to show your portfolio pieces everywhere you go, i would probably get iPad (if you can afford it) cuz people dont want to see your portfolio in such small screen.

this. if you are wanting to really impress them with a image, this would be your best bet right now. Would have to carry something else, but would help in looking more professional, which goes a long way.

if you think AT&T is bad, just wait until you move to Sprint. AT&T will feel like heaven. I would not recommend it. I would wait until you get an EVO like phone on any other service

I went from ATT to sprint and felt like I went to heaven. I had no coverage w/ ATT, let alone 3G coverage. Sprint I've NEVER had a dropped call and have 3G coverage everywhere. The two networks aren't even comparable.

if you want to show your portfolio pieces everywhere you go, i would probably get iPad (if you can afford it) cuz people dont want to see your portfolio in such small screen.

As lame as I think the iPad is, I kinda have to agree.

this. if you are wanting to really impress them with a image, this would be your best bet right now. Would have to carry something else, but would help in looking more professional, which goes a long way.

I too agree that this would be a good move, if only for screen size and the "wow factor" the iPad currently has. People would be all like: "This guy's a pro!"

You'd have to carry 2 things around though. It might be wise to have your portfolio on BOTH your cell phone AND an iPad just in case you're ever caught with a nice opportunity and didn't bring along the iPad. You can say something like "I only have my phone with me right now" and give them a preview.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!