Best Affordable SLR Camera for Novice


Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've been toying with the idea of buying an SLR camera.

I was pretty set on the Nikon D90 DX for ~$1000*, but then I saw that the Canon T1i is only $700* and seems to be the a better buy.

*prices on Amazon.com

What would you guys suggest?

Also, what about the Nikon D5000? I can get it on Amazon new for $640.

And concerning lenses, should I buy the frame with the default lens or should i upgrade? If so, to which one?

Remember, I am a novice photographer, semi-limited budget (no more than $1000) and want quality.

Thanks guys. I've been going through some topics here and you seem knowledgeable. Help a brother out!

-Will

Have you played with either one? There's a big difference between the way canon and nikon feel in your hands and their UI.

I'd take a D90 over the T1i or the D5000, but the T2i is better I think.

Lenses are more important to image quality than the camera body, so maybe go with the D5000 or T1i and spend money on lenses.

Which lenses? It depends on what you want to do with the camera. Let us know.

I have handled a D90 and really liked it.

And the lens I was thinking (if I didn't stick with the stock lens) would be the Canon EF-S 55-250mm unless you have a recommendation for something else? I'm all ears.

The first thing you should learn is you can't mix cannon and nikon lenses. For instance, if you have a Nikon camera, you can't use a Canon lens

The first thing you should learn is you can't mix cannon and nikon lenses. For instance, if you have a Nikon camera, you can't use a Canon lens

Thanks for the clarification. I was curious about that, because Amazon recommended me that lens when I was on the D90 page. Stupid, I know.

and might I add, at those price points those are not really entry level DSLRs

I have the cash to go up to $1000, and I want to buy a camera so I don't have to buy another one for a while.

I'd rather pay a little extra for a better piece of equipment that I know is a great product and will last me a long time.

I am thinking of getting the Canon EOS Rebel T2i EF-S 18-55IS Kit. It's listed at $899 on Canon's website but I'm sure I could find it for less. What do you all think of it?

Great camera that is definitely not entry level. Price is listed retail price. Read my advice from earlier. Look at spending a few hundred of your $1000 on lenses. You'll regret it if you don't.

What will you be using this for? Do you need video?

If you want my advise, use Bing Cash Back, and get 20% off of this: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Nikon+-+12.3-Megapixel+Digital+SLR+Camera+-+Black/9311755.p?id=1218082646627&skuId=9311755

Then go get a telephoto lens.

I don't need the video but it's one of those things that is nice to have. I currently have a Canon Powershot SX 1 IS which is no longer available. If I could I would get a full frame sensor but... those are too much at the moment. The main problem that I have with my current camera is its poor low light performance. Anything more than ISO 800 there is noticeable grain/noise. I use it for pretty much everything from portraits to landscapes and nature.

The D90 was my very first camera. Back when bing had 30% cashback I bought one for $600 and lenses for $180 or so. Such a good deal, but somehow it became defective (I think?) and I could no longer get any good shots so I sold it and built a computer instead, lol. But man, it was really easy to learn and it felt great in your hands. The extra buttons were so useful. I've never used a canon but I'm sure they're equally as great, so it's up to user preference.

I started to miss photography though, so I bought a D40 kit for $147 from a sears. I doubt you can find any left at that price 'cause they were discontinued a while ago, but keep an eye out just in case. I think the D40 is more entry level than D90, but it can't really compete with the D90 at all... I miss the bigger body and motor for non-DX lenses...

$1000 is not entry level. Something like the Canon XSi is entry level. It will cost you around 400-480 for a new body. That is usually the entry level price. I wouldnt buy a $1000 camera and then not know how to use it. the worse thing is when you buy something expensive and not know how to handle it. it is waste of money. For a novice start with the Basic DSLR

I'm contemplating which lens to buy. I want it to be a one-and-done lens. a good one with a quality zoom and crisp image.

A D90 and which lens? Anyone want to shoot?

There is no perfect lens, especially a zoom lens. Zoom lenses are bet at their mid-zoom point, they get worse on each side of that. Zoom lenses are handy and you can get some great shots with them, but primes are the best for crisp images

Also note that lenses usually depreciate much slower than bodies so they're a far better investment.

The D90 with the kit lens should be pretty nice, if you can get something like an 18-105 kit lens then much better.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/580422-REG/Nikon_25448_D90_SLR_Digital_Camera.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/680673-REG/Canon_4462B005_Canon_EOS_Rebel_T2i.html

Try to find them somewhere else for less :p

Yeah. haha.

Okay, I have been considering cheaper alternatives. I've been reading reviews on the D40 and it's pretty much unanimously positive for it. And it's quite cheaper. What price would you say for the D40? On Amazon I can get it for $527 new with the stock 18-55mm lens.

Or pay $120 more for the D5000 with the 18-55mm lens.

There's such a massive difference between the D40 and D5000. Don't get anything less than the D5000. The D5000 has the same sensor as the D300s, an $1800 pro camera. That makes it very good deal for the price.

Oh and they don't even make the D40 any more; it's been replaced by the D3000.

There's such a massive difference between the D40 and D5000. Don't get anything less than the D5000. The D5000 has the same sensor as the D300s, an $1800 pro camera. That makes it very good deal for the price.

Oh and they don't even make the D40 any more; it's been replaced by the D3000.

+1 The D40 is maybe a tier or two below the D5000 all around (noise performance/metering/fps/sensor/) and the D3000 doesn't exactly fill the gap.

Like Crazzy says, get the D5000, Same sensor in D90 and D300s.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!