Recommended Posts

Feature highlights:

  • speed boost in benchmarks over 10.53 (not much change since public alpha)
  • Windows Aero Peek-like tab thumbnails that appear when you hover over tabs
  • Windows 7 thumbnails disabled by default; turn them on via Preferences > Advanced > Additional tab options
  • WebM video support restored
  • Geolocation support restored
  • Some related HTML5 stuff (Web Workers, Offline Web Applications, Cross-Document Messaging)
  • Search suggestions for Wikipedia, Yandex, and Bing (now the default Speed Dial search engine)

Download

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/911086-opera-1060-beta-1/
Share on other sites

i wonder if they are going to skip 10.54 as there have been no new builds of that for a while. 10.53 is still buggy, i guess we'll probably have to wait for 10.61 for a stable build of opera as i'm sure 10.60 will be very buggy too.

WebM support is still buggy, the volume level isn't saved, its 100% for every video, the fullscreen button doesn't make it fullscreen, instead it just maximises it within the window and there are missing resolutions for videos e.g only 360p and 720p, no 480p available to choose.

It's a shame that Opera uses its own rendering engine as well, leaving most websites with square corners alike Internet Explorer. Still a good browser but if it can't render most sites properly I'll never use it.

Also haha Neobond, mine took 30 seconds not minutes. :p

I don't like that Opera is turning off taskbar thumbnails by default, as it seems to run counter to the default Windows 7 taskbar behavior. IE8, Safari and other browsers all support the thumbnail tabs by default, and you turn them off, not the other way around.

I don't like that Opera is turning off taskbar thumbnails by default, as it seems to run counter to the default Windows 7 taskbar behavior. IE8, Safari and other browsers all support the thumbnail tabs by default, and you turn them off, not the other way around.

Imagine you have 30+ active tabs. :wacko: It's irritating for people who use Opera with lots of tabs always active (like I do), plus you can always activate it in Preferences

Avlor, check if the down key on your keyboard is not stuck;) Google Reader has ajax preloading every time you scroll to the bottom. It works ok for me. No leaks with Reader and Neowin opened.

Nope, didn't help. :no: Closed everything except Neowin, 1.4GB. It builds up really quickly after launch, in about 10 minutes I reach over 1.5GB?

It's a shame that Opera uses its own rendering engine as well, leaving most websites with square corners alike Internet Explorer. Still a good browser but if it can't render most sites properly I'll never use it.

Its not Operas fault that many web designer don't use the correct border radius. Because many use -moz-border-radius that only mozilla understand.

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/

It's a shame that Opera uses its own rendering engine as well, leaving most websites with square corners alike Internet Explorer. Still a good browser but if it can't render most sites properly I'll never use it.

Wait, what? Opera's rendering engine does support rounded CSS corners if that's what you mean =/

Not sure what sites you're finding that don't render properly but basically everything I go on works fine

It's a shame that Opera uses its own rendering engine as well, leaving most websites with square corners alike Internet Explorer. Still a good browser but if it can't render most sites properly I'll never use it.

Show me ONE SINGLE web page with 100% clean code that is rendered wrong in Opera, please!

Its rendering engine follows all W3C requirements and regulations, it's HTML5 capable, etc., etc. The 'problem' is it's not a wh*re like the rest - rendering all sorts of crap in half-compatibility modes. It's strict and it renders dirty code the way dirty code is supposed to be rendered. That's why Opera is web developers' choice, not yours.

  • Like 2

Show me ONE SINGLE web page with 100% clean code that is rendered wrong in Opera, please!

Unfortunately, that's completely irrelevant unless you spend all your time browsing only compliance benchmarks. The rest of us need to use the real Internet.

That's why Opera is web developers' choice, not yours.

Well, that's funny, given how Dragonfly is THE slowest and crappiest web development tool I've had the displeasure of using. :whistle:

In fact, I'd say that's possibly the reason web developers don't bother to test for Opera. Not when it makes life so difficult for them.

  • Like 2

Neowin itself uses rounded corners that work fine in opera...

Its not Operas fault that many web designer don't use the correct border radius. Because many use -moz-border-radius that only mozilla understand.

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/

And QFT.

And can we stop the moronic fanboy browser bashing in every thread?

  • Like 2

Hopefully 10.6 will add good HTML5 support. Looks like most will be there, which is nice.

Now lets add to the fire:

- Opera sux because it have a big red O as logo

- It sux because it doesn't use webkit or Gecko

- It can't render sites at all, which is why it sux

- They complained to EU? What?! Then they sux

Missing something?

Hopefully 10.6 will add good HTML5 support. Looks like most will be there, which is nice.

Now lets add to the fire:

- Opera sux because it have a big red O as logo

- It sux because it doesn't use webkit or Gecko

- It can't render sites at all, which is why it sux

- They complained to EU? What?! Then they sux

Missing something?

- Opera is full of bloat

- Opera has a non-standard UI

Be sure to add those to your strawman list.

Wait, what? Opera's rendering engine does support rounded CSS corners if that's what you mean =/

If you jump into the source of, say this page, it's quite a bit of a mess with regards to corners: there's the prefix for Webkit browsers, the prefix for Gecko, and the non prefix for Trident or Presto. For now some sites assume only the first two, not the latter.

With regards to the OS X complaints, I did have a quick look at it and it does feel a little awkward. It's not that bad though... if you want really awkward, check out the Linux port. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      260
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      84
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!