Recommended Posts

If you jump into the source of, say this page, it's quite a bit of a mess with regards to corners: there's the prefix for Webkit browsers, the prefix for Gecko, and the non prefix for Trident or Presto. For now some sites assume only the first two, not the latter.

With regards to the OS X complaints, I did have a quick look at it and it does feel a little awkward. It's not that bad though... if you want really awkward, check out the Linux port. :p

Opera is probably the only browser that actually fucntions properly on linux.

Chrome, the text and the adress bar is either to high or to low, and it jumps between the two for every letter I type.

Chrome and FF both ignore whatever icon theme Gnome is using. Chrome uses some of the OS cursors, FF just say "nah, I really don't like the OS cursors, you're going to use this special in FF only cursors because that's what I say"...

Opera is probably the only browser that actually fucntions properly on linux.

Chrome, the text and the adress bar is either to high or to low, and it jumps between the two for every letter I type.

Chrome and FF both ignore whatever icon theme Gnome is using. Chrome uses some of the OS cursors, FF just say "nah, I really don't like the OS cursors, you're going to use this special in FF only cursors because that's what I say"...

That's odd... the Opera port has different font rendering in the UI and webpages compared to the rest of the system. I'm basing this off running Opera in Ubuntu 10.04.

Imagine you have 30+ active tabs. :wacko: It's irritating for people who use Opera with lots of tabs always active (like I do), plus you can always activate it in Preferences

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

That's odd... the Opera port has different font rendering in the UI and webpages compared to the rest of the system. I'm basing this off running Opera in Ubuntu 10.04.

I've yet to see a browser that renders nice fonts on linux though. but not as annoying as the cursor thing. Bur fonts on linux browsers tend to be a lot smaller than they should be for some reason.

But it is part of the reason why I rarely boot into ubuntu, that and the horrible flash performance and lack of a decent RDP client to connect to my media center.

Also is it me or is the beta more unstable than the alpha ? the alpha/daily builds worked great for me. the beta seems to crash occasionally, and relatively often when I click tabs, maybe when I switch tabs to fast or something, not sure.

I've yet to see a browser that renders nice fonts on linux though.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Perhaps, but Opera seems to render fonts closer to like the webdesigner wanted it to be, though, it still looks toos mall on all linux browsers.

Its rendering engine follows all W3C requirements and regulations, it's HTML5 capable, etc., etc. The 'problem' is it's not a wh*re like the rest - rendering all sorts of crap in half-compatibility modes. It's strict and it renders dirty code the way dirty code is supposed to be rendered.

Huh? What are you talking about?

Opera is probably more of a "######" than the rest because it isn't supported by most sites. So it needs to add even more compatibility workarounds in practice. It was designed from the ground up to handle "Street HTML", as they call it. Meaning that they go out of their way to be compatible with crappy code.

Which is also why most compatibility problems are because of browser sniffing.

Huh? What are you talking about?

Opera is probably more of a "######" than the rest because it isn't supported by most sites. So it needs to add even more compatibility workarounds in practice. It was designed from the ground up to handle "Street HTML", as they call it. Meaning that they go out of their way to be compatible with crappy code.

Which is also why most compatibility problems are because of browser sniffing.

I don't quite think you understand how this works.

back in the days, the web was like the wild west, there was no standards. And only one browser even supported, promoted and followed the W3C suggestions. guess which one.

Today there are standards, andfor the web to work as big as it's gotten. Web sites need to follow these standards, so the browsers knows how to render them.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Would be nice if they can get this fixed by final, but at this rate it's probably going into a 10.6x release (if at all).

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

What's also weird is that since they disabled taskbar thumbnails by default, sometimes the taskbar thumbnails break. For instance, I get only two window previews in the taskbar when I have seven tabs.

I don't quite think you understand how this works.

back in the days, the web was like the wild west, there was no standards. And only one browser even supported, promoted and followed the W3C suggestions. guess which one.

You don't understand how this works. If Opera had followed the standards 100% and refused to render broken code, it wouldn't have worked anywhere. So they did build Opera from the ground up for compatibility while at the same time working to push open standards.

Why does every Opera thread turn into a degeneration of the same arguments over and over again? If you people don't like it, don't use it. Personally, I love Opera. I find it works with every site I encounter. I love it's features. I love it's speed. I love how I never encounter bugs (yes, some people claim they encounter obscure bugs, but I have no issues). It works for me. That's what matters. I don't see firefox or chrome threads degenerating constantly like the Opera ones do from the get-go.

  • Like 3

Why does every Opera thread turn into a degeneration of the same arguments over and over again? If you people don't like it, don't use it. Personally, I love Opera. I find it works with every site I encounter. I love it's features. I love it's speed. I love how I never encounter bugs (yes, some people claim they encounter obscure bugs, but I have no issues). It works for me. That's what matters. I don't see firefox or chrome threads degenerating constantly like the Opera ones do from the get-go.

+1

probably because because of smaller user community of opera, haters think that they waltz over to opera threads and trash and get away with it :/

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

They had it that way after the feature was first implemented but a lot of people complained in their forums and blogs so it was changed. Can't please everyone.

Btw. the new build released today fixes a lot of small stuff. Imo it's the best build since a long time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!