Recommended Posts

If you jump into the source of, say this page, it's quite a bit of a mess with regards to corners: there's the prefix for Webkit browsers, the prefix for Gecko, and the non prefix for Trident or Presto. For now some sites assume only the first two, not the latter.

With regards to the OS X complaints, I did have a quick look at it and it does feel a little awkward. It's not that bad though... if you want really awkward, check out the Linux port. :p

Opera is probably the only browser that actually fucntions properly on linux.

Chrome, the text and the adress bar is either to high or to low, and it jumps between the two for every letter I type.

Chrome and FF both ignore whatever icon theme Gnome is using. Chrome uses some of the OS cursors, FF just say "nah, I really don't like the OS cursors, you're going to use this special in FF only cursors because that's what I say"...

Opera is probably the only browser that actually fucntions properly on linux.

Chrome, the text and the adress bar is either to high or to low, and it jumps between the two for every letter I type.

Chrome and FF both ignore whatever icon theme Gnome is using. Chrome uses some of the OS cursors, FF just say "nah, I really don't like the OS cursors, you're going to use this special in FF only cursors because that's what I say"...

That's odd... the Opera port has different font rendering in the UI and webpages compared to the rest of the system. I'm basing this off running Opera in Ubuntu 10.04.

Imagine you have 30+ active tabs. :wacko: It's irritating for people who use Opera with lots of tabs always active (like I do), plus you can always activate it in Preferences

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

That's odd... the Opera port has different font rendering in the UI and webpages compared to the rest of the system. I'm basing this off running Opera in Ubuntu 10.04.

I've yet to see a browser that renders nice fonts on linux though. but not as annoying as the cursor thing. Bur fonts on linux browsers tend to be a lot smaller than they should be for some reason.

But it is part of the reason why I rarely boot into ubuntu, that and the horrible flash performance and lack of a decent RDP client to connect to my media center.

Also is it me or is the beta more unstable than the alpha ? the alpha/daily builds worked great for me. the beta seems to crash occasionally, and relatively often when I click tabs, maybe when I switch tabs to fast or something, not sure.

I've yet to see a browser that renders nice fonts on linux though.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Perhaps, but Opera seems to render fonts closer to like the webdesigner wanted it to be, though, it still looks toos mall on all linux browsers.

Its rendering engine follows all W3C requirements and regulations, it's HTML5 capable, etc., etc. The 'problem' is it's not a wh*re like the rest - rendering all sorts of crap in half-compatibility modes. It's strict and it renders dirty code the way dirty code is supposed to be rendered.

Huh? What are you talking about?

Opera is probably more of a "######" than the rest because it isn't supported by most sites. So it needs to add even more compatibility workarounds in practice. It was designed from the ground up to handle "Street HTML", as they call it. Meaning that they go out of their way to be compatible with crappy code.

Which is also why most compatibility problems are because of browser sniffing.

Huh? What are you talking about?

Opera is probably more of a "######" than the rest because it isn't supported by most sites. So it needs to add even more compatibility workarounds in practice. It was designed from the ground up to handle "Street HTML", as they call it. Meaning that they go out of their way to be compatible with crappy code.

Which is also why most compatibility problems are because of browser sniffing.

I don't quite think you understand how this works.

back in the days, the web was like the wild west, there was no standards. And only one browser even supported, promoted and followed the W3C suggestions. guess which one.

Today there are standards, andfor the web to work as big as it's gotten. Web sites need to follow these standards, so the browsers knows how to render them.

Both Firefox and Chrome render the fonts for me exactly as they're instructed to via the Font settings in Gnome. Be it slight, medium, full hinting, autohint, subpixel or not, it renders it exactly as the rest of the system, without any deviations. Opera doesn't.

Yeah, that's what I meant.

Would be nice if they can get this fixed by final, but at this rate it's probably going into a 10.6x release (if at all).

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

What's also weird is that since they disabled taskbar thumbnails by default, sometimes the taskbar thumbnails break. For instance, I get only two window previews in the taskbar when I have seven tabs.

I don't quite think you understand how this works.

back in the days, the web was like the wild west, there was no standards. And only one browser even supported, promoted and followed the W3C suggestions. guess which one.

You don't understand how this works. If Opera had followed the standards 100% and refused to render broken code, it wouldn't have worked anywhere. So they did build Opera from the ground up for compatibility while at the same time working to push open standards.

Why does every Opera thread turn into a degeneration of the same arguments over and over again? If you people don't like it, don't use it. Personally, I love Opera. I find it works with every site I encounter. I love it's features. I love it's speed. I love how I never encounter bugs (yes, some people claim they encounter obscure bugs, but I have no issues). It works for me. That's what matters. I don't see firefox or chrome threads degenerating constantly like the Opera ones do from the get-go.

  • Like 3

Why does every Opera thread turn into a degeneration of the same arguments over and over again? If you people don't like it, don't use it. Personally, I love Opera. I find it works with every site I encounter. I love it's features. I love it's speed. I love how I never encounter bugs (yes, some people claim they encounter obscure bugs, but I have no issues). It works for me. That's what matters. I don't see firefox or chrome threads degenerating constantly like the Opera ones do from the get-go.

+1

probably because because of smaller user community of opera, haters think that they waltz over to opera threads and trash and get away with it :/

I know it can be turned on again, but like I said, the default Win7 behavior is to have them on. I'd prefer most Windows applications to follow system standards whenever possible.

They had it that way after the feature was first implemented but a lot of people complained in their forums and blogs so it was changed. Can't please everyone.

Btw. the new build released today fixes a lot of small stuff. Imo it's the best build since a long time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
    • Get yo ass to space
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!