OMG, I got a negative vote! What for?


Recommended Posts

So basically what you're looking for is a forum where an MVC or above posts something and we are to all bow and chant "we're not worthy" so he/she gets an ego boost and no one hurts their sensitive feelings.....gotcha.

Not to mention, I could post 10,000 positive remarks and get 0 votes yet get 50 bad votes for a single post. Unless everyone votes on every post, I can guarantee you people will focus entirely on the negative and barely on the positive.

The voting is all a matter of opinion and how the reader interpretes the message. Opinions vary, and everyone is entitled to one. So why let a select few vote on an opinion and no one else? Especially, if the few all misinterpret the message.

  • Like 1

Any way to hide the - from us Subbies? I wont ever neg vote anyway. Every contribution here is a contribution, even the crap that comes out of my mouth sometimes :rofl:

So basically what you're looking for is a forum where an MVC or above posts something and we are to all bow and chant "we're not worthy" so he/she gets an ego boost and no one hurts their sensitive feelings.....gotcha.

Not to mention, I could post 10,000 positive remarks and get 0 votes yet get 50 bad votes for a single post. Unless everyone votes on every post, I can guarantee you people will focus entirely on the negative and barely on the positive.

The voting is all a matter of opinion and how the reader interpretes the message. Opinions vary, and everyone is entitled to one. So why let a select few vote on an opinion and no one else? Especially, if the few all misinterpret the message.

Letting everybody downvote posts would ensue in massive chaos - you just know how certain users would be downvoted regardless of what they were actually posting. Or you'd have certain IRC regulars gang up on certain posts.

Letting only somewhat trusted community members downvote posts is a good compromise. Whether or not certain individuals who have it deserve the MVC badge is an entirely different discussion, ok, but one we shouldn't start.

At least reset all reputation to zero.

P.S. I'm a member of one of those forums with negative reputation activated and EVERYBODY has a red stripe under their profile photo with -100, 'cause haters are everywhere (and multiple accounts also). This is a step back for Neowin in my opinion. Also, there'll be a lot of Christians vs Muslims +/- fights and I don't predict anything positive coming in the near future for Neowin members - only hate, keyboard fighting and on-line revenge. We already have the User Rating in profiles! This is useless and it'll fail, but before failing it'll oppose many people against their buddies, 'cause it's also anonymous. Just wait and see.

Letting everybody downvote posts would ensue in massive chaos - you just know how certain users would be downvoted regardless of what they were actually posting. Or you'd have certain IRC regulars gang up on certain posts.

I was unaware the IRC was a seperate "gang" of the user base. between the negatives and now this irc gang the underbelly of neowin is being exposed! I much preferred my ignorant rosey eyed view of her chest up until now.

If you are contributing on the site how you should be, then a - vote to your replies should be the least of your worries...

If you are contributing on the site how you should be, then a + vote to your replies should be the least of your worries...?

But if only MVCs and staff can downvote, then isn't this feature terribly underpowered? You can get upvoted numerous times by people for saying something clever or witty, but if you actually start doing bad things, you'll get downvoted a handful of times at it's best - and that won't damage the overall reputation of an user too much.

I was unaware the IRC was a seperate "gang" of the user base. between the negatives and now this irc gang the underbelly of neowin is being exposed! I much preferred my ignorant rosey eyed view of her chest up until now.

How do you think brentaal got the majority of his rep points? IRC regulars upvoting more or less subtle troll posts of his.

But if only MVCs and staff can downvote, then isn't this feature terribly underpowered? You can get upvoted numerous times by people for saying something clever or witty, but if you actually start doing bad things, you'll get downvoted a handful of times at it's best - and that won't damage the overall reputation of an user too much.

Exactly, that's why my suggestion would be more efficient.

How do you think brentaal got the majority of his rep points? IRC regulars upvoting more or less subtle troll posts of his.

and how did you get them? :alien:

Since you can't complain that you are voted down, what should one do if he firmly believes that he was given a negative vote unfairly. Will mods have right to upvote a comment downvoted by MVCs. If so how to bring this to their attention? I ask this because I have seen MVCs taking jabs at members who don't agree with them even when they are wrong and quoting the 'offending' members low post count as if the number of posts indicate commenter's quality.

  • Like 1

Since you can't complain that you are voted down, what should one do if he firmly believes that he was given a negative vote unfairly. Will mods have right to upvote a comment downvoted by MVCs. If so how to bring this to their attention? I ask this because I have seen MVCs taking jabs at members who don't agree with them even when they are wrong and quoting the 'offending' members low post count as if the number of posts indicate commenter's quality.

This. Luckily, however, the "original" 10M posts thread isn't active - given the number of people who bitched at me (a fair few of whom, were MVCs), I'd probably be in negative numbers. Still, hopefully this new system works "as intended".

Why? The negative points just subtracts from the positive points. So if a person is warned, 20 rep points are deducted.

Because +40 and -30 will give you a whole different idea, than simply +10.

Or maybe I should've started my sentence with "OR" instead of "AND", because that would actually make some sense with the current mechanism.

Who even takes the Rep points system seriously? All the most upvoted members are the ones in the Real World Issues (Tabloid central) forum. No one cares. No one ever will.

should add the clique that is IRC are always in the +10's :rofl:

(Y) :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      103
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!