Suggest Me A Car Under $4K


Recommended Posts

Well I don't know about the $600 oil change part, but people say to repair Audi's is very expensive.

On craigslist I found a 2001 A4 Turbo for $3800. I am wondering why are Audi's going for that low with low mileage (92,000 miles). Is it because that it's too expensive to fix and they are just trying to get rid of it or what.

I don't think the price/value of the car has anything to do with the cost of repairs. If that were the case, used Ferrari's would be dirt cheap. Not to mention the RX-7 or RX-8 should be pretty much free to give away seeing as they are the least reliable cars ever made in the last 20 years from Mazda.

A 2001 A4 1.8T for $3800 is definitely not a bad price. That's awesome, good find. It makes perfect sense though, if you think about it. The 2001 A4 uses the B5 chassis. Since than, Audi has updated their "generations" 3 times, with the B6, B7's and now B8's. 2001 was 9 years ago, that's a very long time ago for Audi :)

Nissan 300zx? Every Z car is great, but holy crap that VG30DETT in the Z32 fits tightly in the engine bay.. Maintenance will not be cheap unless you do it by yourself.

I will echo you and add that finding a Z, any Z, in anything other than pitiful condition for under 4k is going to be impossible. They have become desirable cars in the collector, grassroots racing, and import tuner communities at the same time, one of the few cars to do so.

The OP has already expressed his desire for a car in good shape so any Z for under 4k is going to be out. Additionally he has expressed a desire to seat more than four. If you want to put more than four in a Z they had better be circus clowns or you need a chainsaw and a tarp.

Well I have been researching the Audi's more after what you have said Xeon and I found out that the A4 is a Jetta varient. What is the difference between the two that sets them apart? Are you an owner of an Audi?

What about a 2001 Nissan Maxima? I have read that they have engine problems and transmission problems. Any owners know about this?

I will echo you and add that finding a Z, any Z, in anything other than pitiful condition for under 4k is going to be impossible. They have become desirable cars in the collector, grassroots racing, and import tuner communities at the same time, one of the few cars to do so.

The OP has already expressed his desire for a car in good shape so any Z for under 4k is going to be out. Additionally he has expressed a desire to seat more than four. If you want to put more than four in a Z they had better be circus clowns or you need a chainsaw and a tarp.

:laugh:

Well I have been researching the Audi's more after what you have said Xeon and I found out that the A4 is a Jetta varient. What is the difference between the two that sets them apart? Are you an owner of an Audi?

What about a 2001 Nissan Maxima? I have read that they have engine problems and transmission problems. Any owners know about this?

:laugh:

Hey buddy!

Audi's and Volkswagen's share only some drivetrains, not so much chassis. There are very few differences between the 1.8T found in an Audi, and a 1.8T found in a Volkswagen. Most of the time, Audi motors have slightly more efficient valvetrains and fuel injection (bigger, more efficient fuel injectors, fuel pumps etc.). On another note, Audi transmissions are different (and much better than their Volkswagen counter parts).

Having a different chassis's, there are also other improvements found in Audi's such as obviously more luxurious interiors that include Bose premium sound systems, leather seats, nicer looking clusters. Overall, they are much more "expensive" on the inside. Another upgrade to Audi over Volkswagen 1.8T models, is the turbocharger its self as well as the engine management system. The turbo found on Audi 1.8T's are BorgWarner K03-S (or K03-Sport), while the turbo on the VW 1.8 (found in the Jetta, GTI), is a regular BorgWarner K03. Not something that is really important, but it matters to some people.

In response to your question, I do own an Audi. I've owned a 2001 Audi S4 Avant with an Audi RS4 "widebody" conversion for a few years and I couldn't be happier with the car :)

This is coming from a previous Porsche 911 owner :)

post-10985-12804857663594.jpg

post-10985-12804857788539.jpg

post-10985-12804857885014.jpg

Hey buddy!

Audi's and Volkswagen's share only some drivetrains, not so much chassis. There are very few differences between the 1.8T found in an Audi, and a 1.8T found in a Volkswagen. Most of the time, Audi motors have slightly more efficient valvetrains and fuel injection (bigger, more efficient fuel injectors, fuel pumps etc.). On another note, Audi transmissions are different (and much better than their Volkswagen counter parts).

Having a different chassis's, there are also other improvements found in Audi's such as obviously more luxurious interiors that include Bose premium sound systems, leather seats, nicer looking clusters. Overall, they are much more "expensive" on the inside. Another upgrade to Audi over Volkswagen 1.8T models, is the turbocharger its self as well as the engine management system. The turbo found on Audi 1.8T's are BorgWarner K03-S (or K03-Sport), while the turbo on the VW 1.8 (found in the Jetta, GTI), is a regular BorgWarner K03. Not something that is really important, but it matters to some people.

In response to your question, I do own an Audi. I've owned a 2001 Audi S4 Avant with an Audi RS4 "widebody" conversion for a few years and I couldn't be happier with the car :)

This is coming from a previous Porsche 911 owner :)

I read this:

actually Audi stopped using VW platforms in 2001 for the A4 the A6 and A8 were already on Audi derived platforms. they use different V6 engine's if you get a 4 cylinder turbo than engine parts would be the same cost although labor may be slightly more. the suspension systems are different and you will pay more for Audi suspension components than VW. Audis do have better reliability than VW as many of the parts are upgraded for the extra weight and performance that the Audi has. if you buy one that is 200 or older than it would be pretty similar to a passat (which is also more reliable than a jetta)

Is it true?

Also looking at this: http://repairpal.com/audi-a4_quattro-2001/common_problems , it's not helping with a decision to buy an Audi. :( I don't really have a lot of money to sink into repairs and if these things fail it would be too expensive to fix. :/

I love your Audi. The color is perfect. :p Any problems with yours?

I read this:

Is it true?

Also looking at this: http://repairpal.com/audi-a4_quattro-2001/common_problems , it's not helping with a decision to buy an Audi. :( I don't really have a lot of money to sink into repairs and if these things fail it would be too expensive to fix. :/

I love your Audi. The color is perfect. :p Any problems with yours?

TBH, if you're okay with something in the 97-99 range, look at a Mk3 Jetta... I'm looking for a Wolfsburg or a VR6 swapped one myself, but they're damn reliable... They are boxy, but I like the box look and I will NEVER buy a coupe again, I want four doors. Take a look, you might like them. The newest (late 99+ up till the new City Jettas + full Jettas) are nice as well, but reported electrical issues in some cases and I prefer the rock solidness of the old ones... Take a look, people were selling them here from 2500-5000.

TBH, if you're okay with something in the 97-99 range, look at a Mk3 Jetta... I'm looking for a Wolfsburg or a VR6 swapped one myself, but they're damn reliable... They are boxy, but I like the box look and I will NEVER buy a coupe again, I want four doors. Take a look, you might like them. The newest (late 99+ up till the new City Jettas + full Jettas) are nice as well, but reported electrical issues in some cases and I prefer the rock solidness of the old ones... Take a look, people were selling them here from 2500-5000.

VR6's are infamous for chain tensioner noises after 80k miles, which leads to replacement. It's an expensive fix. I love VR6's for other reasons than everyday reliability :)

OP: I looked at the list you showed me of common problems and yes, those are all realistic problems. They are all common problems of all/most modern fuel injected cars. There isn't really any expensive on that list except the torque converter replacement. Basically get a 5 speed manual and the problem will never haunt you :) The rest of the problems are pretty much all maintenance related.

A little off topic, but nice car, Xeon! As I was reading your post and came across your car description as "widebody" I had visions of some really overblown and overdone looking mod, but that is nice, clean and almost subtle. It looks like it could have come from the factory like that. I really like the lines on your car even the roof rack contributes.

A little off topic, but nice car, Xeon! As I was reading your post and came across your car description as "widebody" I had visions of some really overblown and overdone looking mod, but that is nice, clean and almost subtle. It looks like it could have come from the factory like that. I really like the lines on your car even the roof rack contributes.

Thanks man! :D

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the long time no post, but I may have found a car that I want to get. I found a 2000 Audi A6 Sedan 2.8L V6 with 124,000 miles on it and I want to get your opinions on it. Is it a good reliable car? I have been reading stuff on the internet that it would be a lot of $$ to get it fixed and it has problems a lot and I don't have a lot of money to put into repairs EVERY month. :/

if you don't have money to put into possible repairs, buy a cheap car where you can afford the repairs with and do most things yourself. IE..look at the plugs, when it is time to do a tune up can you? Look at the transmission pan, can you get to each nut holding it in? Brakes, are they all disk or are they drum in the rear, IMO it is easier to replace disks than drums, no springs to worry about, fkers like to pop everywhere.

I think you should learn to do some things on your own. It is a small investment in tools and can save you hundreds, but some jobs aren't worth the agony (ie. a crank sensor for a 2.5S Altima...sure it is a 30-60 dollar part, to have someone put it in with cost of part is 250, to put it in yourself requires you to be able to dislocate your arm in a few places with convential tools....just let someone else do it for 250, it just isn't worth the pain and suffering you have to go through to put it in that blind spot (can't see where you have to put it in, can only feel...it is deep in a cavity by the rear motor mount). give it to someone who deals with that crap every day, he knows tricks that you don't know to get things in like that.)

You may want to seriously consider american, parts are usually cheaper than german. Jap parts are usually cheaper than german too, but not as cheap as american in most cases. (example, american cars (for the most part) run fine on the cheapest plugs you can get your hands on. jap and german cars have higher compression which require a special plug to run right (the will run on the cheapys but I used to get a lot of complaints about them not running right with the cheapy autolite plugs and often returned for the better plugs, this was in the 1999-2001 circa when I worked behind a parts counter)...average cost of a cheapy autolite plug 1.50, average cost of a foreign plug 8..so it would be $6 for a 4cyl with cheapy plugs and $32 for a 4cyl for foreign plugs, while it isn't a lot of money it is to someone who doesn't have any and is worried about spending a lot for repairs, and that is just 1 part of the tune up...airfilter, pcv valve, possible fuel filter, possible belt (average cost of a tune up back then was about 100, don't know what a tuneup is now as you don't need some parts like a cap and a rotor and some cars have a non servicable fuel filter, you may or may not have to replace the belt or want to replace the belt as it may be too difficult to replace (all depends how much room the engineers gave you to put your hand down there). I like rwd cars, so much easier to do belts and plugs, except for an expedition where they hide the rear plugs under the cowl, fkers).

Two of mty friends had A4's

Mate 1. had transmission go on him. Was a manual. $3000 to repair. Audi dont provide individual parts apparently.

Mate 2. Had auto go on his. replaced transmission at $3200 and it lasted a year. Now its gone again. He is selling the car. He got the car for $11000 with 80000kms, ended up with transmission and other repairs to be $18000

I wouldnt buy an audi.

Two of mty friends had A4's

Mate 1. had transmission go on him. Was a manual. $3000 to repair. Audi dont provide individual parts apparently.

If this is true, then that is why the good Lord created the aftermarket, scrapyards and the internet. Thy Lord and his faithful prophet of Henry Ford and his system of standardized parts has provided for thee. Halle-fricken-lujah

I saw a 2002 Nissan Altima 2.5S today and I got it to a very reasonable price, but that's because the Transmission is leaking fluid from the front seal. The guy said it would cost about $550 to fix it. Do you think that its still a good car to buy?

how many miles? what seal?

here is what has gone in mine at 180,000

o2 sensors at 100,000

crank sensor at 180,000

flex pipe at 160,000 (well not gone but I don't think it is holding pressure)

other than that typical oil changes, brakes, tune up, trans fluid, air filter, and tires.

how many miles? what seal?

here is what has gone in mine at 180,000

o2 sensors at 100,000

crank sensor at 180,000

flex pipe at 160,000 (well not gone but I don't think it is holding pressure)

other than that typical oil changes, brakes, tune up, trans fluid, air filter, and tires.

It has 92,000 miles and he said it is the front main seal, where the torque converter goes in.

You don't buy an eight plus year old car to service it at the official dealership. It doesn't make sense. Of course, any kind of work done there will seem expensive compared to what the car cost you. So you take it to a no-name brand garage :) All you gotta do is find a good private mechanic specializing in a particular brand.

p.s. it's pretty easy to ruin any car, even the most reliable, if you don't take care of it. Give me a Bentley and I'll make its tranny bleed beyond repair in a week! By the way, do you know Bentley shares its transmission model with Audi A8? (Bentley belongs to VW) In fact, all German car manufacturers outsource their transmissions to another German company, called ZF. So, Audi's transmission is no better or worse than the one found in a Benz or a bimmer. It's all about how an individual car was maintained.

could be a recall. I would get it fixed if it is leaking, I am sure if you jack it up you will see. but I think I would go for it. get a car fax, it won't show everything but it will show major things.

It's not a recall. :/ Do you think that it is worth it though? Under $4K I am buying it.

You don't buy an eight plus year old car to service it at the official dealership. It doesn't make sense. Of course, any kind of work done there will seem expensive compared to what the car cost you. So you take it to a no-name brand garage :) All you gotta do is find a good private mechanic specializing in a particular brand.

p.s. it's pretty easy to ruin any car, even the most reliable, if you don't take care of it. Give me a Bentley and I'll make its tranny bleed beyond repair in a week! By the way, do you know Bentley has the same model of transmission as found in Audi A8? (Bentley belongs to VW) In fact, all German car manufacturers outsource their transmissions to another German company, called ZF. So, Audi's transmission is no better or worse than the one found in a Benz or a bimmer. It's all about how an individual car was maintained.

I am not going to get it serviced at a dealership, they are charging me $1100 to get the problem fixed, but the guy said his mechanic can fix it for $550. Do you think that I will have problems with the transmission latter on, after I get it fixed?

I wouldn't buy a car with a leaking transmission. If it leaks, it means something had already happened to it and the problem wasn't fixed properly or it's just dying due to corrosion or damage, or something else.

In any case, you don't know how long the previous owner drove the car for with possibly next to no oil in the transmission.

2003 Escort ZX2.

2 door coupe, strong 130HPi4 Zetec, non-interference. if you get a 5spd great pick-up and if you want you can get great handling out of it for cheap, just springs, struts and swaybar. I get about 42MPG on the HW with mine. I have an intake and custom tune on it, few Ford Racing suspension pieces.

I don't drive it much anymore but I love having a small little go cart handling car that gets great gas for when I need to go to NYC.

A 98 or 99 Honda Passort/Izuzu Rodeo will do you quite nicely. I have owned one for 8 years, had very little issue with it. Bought it at 110K now at 164K. Every problem is well documented on automativeforums.com and if it you happen to have any questions there are very informed people on that board to help you. Not to mention DO IT yourself guides with pictures to do the simple repairs, like a dirty egr valve etc. Great Vehicle HIGHLY recommended.

Technically any year of the passport/rodeo is a good year. There all documented well. I paid 7700 for my EX Honda Passport after taxes, today its not worth much more then 4000. However i've done plenty of modifications to it.

Just change the oil on this beast and your set! Mines fully loaded, leather, sunroof, heated mirrors etc.

29822190031_large.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!