Suggest Me A Car Under $4K


Recommended Posts

If this is true, then that is why the good Lord created the aftermarket, scrapyards and the internet. Thy Lord and his faithful prophet of Henry Ford and his system of standardized parts has provided for thee. Halle-fricken-lujah

Yeh to be honest they ain't that mechanically minded. One did buy a reconditioned trans but that one died after a year just outa warranty

I know what ya mean by wreckers etc but I they ain't the sorta ppl to locate parts and install themselves

I believe they were ripped off majorly

modified = stay away. you don't know what dumb ass did. he probably tried racing it, meaning it is beat to crap (this would explain the leaky seal).

No doubt.

If you see any leaks on any use car I would suggest staying away. Small leaks turn into big leaks and that cost money.

I would find it hard to trust a leaking transmission. Even after the leak is fixed I worry damage was done while it was possibly ran low on oil. Plenty of cars out there. I would keep looking or at least make a much lower offer.

The intake modification also throws up a bit of a flag as well. That one does not look too poorly done though. Actual hose clamps that are close to the correct size and placed so as to be accessible is a good sign for instance.

I would find it hard to trust a leaking transmission. Even after the leak is fixed I worry damage was done while it was possibly ran low on oil. Plenty of cars out there. I would keep looking or at least make a much lower offer.

The intake modification also throws up a bit of a flag as well. That one does not look too poorly done though. Actual hose clamps that are close to the correct size and placed so as to be accessible is a good sign for instance.

It is hard to mess up a kit. The issue isnt the quality of the kit, the issue is why did he do it in the first place. To gain that .5 hp to the wheels. With the money these dumb asses put into ridiculous parts they could just get a nitrous kit and add some hp they can feel. But I digress. He put it on because he wanted more power (obviously not for engine dress up, that engine compartment looks pretty ugly, and I would think if he was going for looks he would have left the engine cover on it) which would mean beating the living crap out of that poor car.

It is hard to mess up a kit. The issue isnt the quality of the kit, the issue is why did he do it in the first place. To gain that .5 hp to the wheels. With the money these dumb asses put into ridiculous parts they could just get a nitrous kit and add some hp they can feel. But I digress. He put it on because he wanted more power (obviously not for engine dress up, that engine compartment looks pretty ugly, and I would think if he was going for looks he would have left the engine cover on it) which would mean beating the living crap out of that poor car.

Ohh I agree. I just have seen some real abortions done even with what started out as a quality kit. It is still a red flag just not as bad as the coffee cans with zip tied garden hose I have seen in the past.

again these silly people with the aftermarket cold air intake on a stock engine lol... Get something entirely stock if what you want is a reliable daily driver car.

wow a honduh driver actually agrees that this is a stupid mod...there is hope for you.

I really need a car for school and for work due to the fact that my current one (1993 Toyota Pickup) needs repairs and instead of putting money to repair it I would rather put it towards a newer and better car. What do you suggest for under $4K in the USA? I need a car that can get places and can go at least 65-75 miles an hour on the HWY and maybe newer than 1997.

I have been looking at cars on Craigslist, the only one that has caught my attention is a 2001-2002 Toyota Solara, but those are going for around $3.5K+. Are Toyota Solara's good, namely the 2001-2002 ones?

If you can suggest me a car I would really appreciate it. :)

if you are willing, get a bike, a 250 ninja will cost 4k new and that bike holds its resale value well.

if you are willing, get a bike, a 250 ninja will cost 4k new and that bike holds its resale value well.

Can't, my parents would freak out if I ride one and I don't know how to ride one. :p

I went to see a 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 today and I got it down to $4,200. Worth it? Are they good reliable cars? This compared with an 2002+ Alitma or 2000+ Maxima, which would be the best bang for the buck?

What about VW Passat's? They any good?

wow a honduh driver actually agrees that this is a stupid mod...there is hope for you.

I know what I like :p Rice and modifying a FWD daily driver isn't one of them. My Civic's a very reliable and fun little car for what it is. That's it. It's not fast, it's not a sports car and it can't beat vipers even if I dropped $4000 on a b18c engine that would barely double my horsepower. Seriously, you can buy an LS1 at that price lol...

Can't, my parents would freak out if I ride one and I don't know how to ride one. :p

I went to see a 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 today and I got it down to $4,200. Worth it? Are they good reliable cars? This compared with an 2002+ Alitma or 2000+ Maxima, which would be the best bang for the buck?

What about VW Passat's? They any good?

imo I would stick with honda or nissan or toyota. vw isn't known for quality. the accord ex is a very good and reliable car.

Well it's too late for the Honda now. :( The guy was supposed to hold it for me, but he sold it. People buy cars SO fast if they have good deals on them. :(

Don't worry there are a few hundred thousand more Hondas out there. You are not exactly looking for a Rembrandt here. You are looking for a car and not a rare one at that. There are tons out there already and they keep making more of em everyday. You will eventually find the car for you.

imo I would stick with honda or nissan or toyota. vw isn't known for quality. the accord ex is a very good and reliable car.

I found a 2002 VW Passat for $3900. It has 133,000 miles on it and he hit a pole in his building complex and the bumper in the front is dangling just a bit. See image:

xn96xg.jpg

It is a GLS 1.8T 4dr Sedan w/Automatic. Worth it? He said he can bring it down to like 3,300 because of the issue with the bumper and he is leaving the state.

you couldn't pay me to drive it. imo, keep looking. You almost found one in the accord. If you assist with a zip, I can help you with some autotrader/vehix/autoshopper/etc searching.

Why not? It has good reviews on edmunds: http://www.edmunds.com/volkswagen/passat/2002/review.html

Zip is: 90706.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!