Suggest Me A Car Under $4K


Recommended Posts

If this is true, then that is why the good Lord created the aftermarket, scrapyards and the internet. Thy Lord and his faithful prophet of Henry Ford and his system of standardized parts has provided for thee. Halle-fricken-lujah

Yeh to be honest they ain't that mechanically minded. One did buy a reconditioned trans but that one died after a year just outa warranty

I know what ya mean by wreckers etc but I they ain't the sorta ppl to locate parts and install themselves

I believe they were ripped off majorly

modified = stay away. you don't know what dumb ass did. he probably tried racing it, meaning it is beat to crap (this would explain the leaky seal).

No doubt.

If you see any leaks on any use car I would suggest staying away. Small leaks turn into big leaks and that cost money.

I would find it hard to trust a leaking transmission. Even after the leak is fixed I worry damage was done while it was possibly ran low on oil. Plenty of cars out there. I would keep looking or at least make a much lower offer.

The intake modification also throws up a bit of a flag as well. That one does not look too poorly done though. Actual hose clamps that are close to the correct size and placed so as to be accessible is a good sign for instance.

I would find it hard to trust a leaking transmission. Even after the leak is fixed I worry damage was done while it was possibly ran low on oil. Plenty of cars out there. I would keep looking or at least make a much lower offer.

The intake modification also throws up a bit of a flag as well. That one does not look too poorly done though. Actual hose clamps that are close to the correct size and placed so as to be accessible is a good sign for instance.

It is hard to mess up a kit. The issue isnt the quality of the kit, the issue is why did he do it in the first place. To gain that .5 hp to the wheels. With the money these dumb asses put into ridiculous parts they could just get a nitrous kit and add some hp they can feel. But I digress. He put it on because he wanted more power (obviously not for engine dress up, that engine compartment looks pretty ugly, and I would think if he was going for looks he would have left the engine cover on it) which would mean beating the living crap out of that poor car.

It is hard to mess up a kit. The issue isnt the quality of the kit, the issue is why did he do it in the first place. To gain that .5 hp to the wheels. With the money these dumb asses put into ridiculous parts they could just get a nitrous kit and add some hp they can feel. But I digress. He put it on because he wanted more power (obviously not for engine dress up, that engine compartment looks pretty ugly, and I would think if he was going for looks he would have left the engine cover on it) which would mean beating the living crap out of that poor car.

Ohh I agree. I just have seen some real abortions done even with what started out as a quality kit. It is still a red flag just not as bad as the coffee cans with zip tied garden hose I have seen in the past.

again these silly people with the aftermarket cold air intake on a stock engine lol... Get something entirely stock if what you want is a reliable daily driver car.

wow a honduh driver actually agrees that this is a stupid mod...there is hope for you.

I really need a car for school and for work due to the fact that my current one (1993 Toyota Pickup) needs repairs and instead of putting money to repair it I would rather put it towards a newer and better car. What do you suggest for under $4K in the USA? I need a car that can get places and can go at least 65-75 miles an hour on the HWY and maybe newer than 1997.

I have been looking at cars on Craigslist, the only one that has caught my attention is a 2001-2002 Toyota Solara, but those are going for around $3.5K+. Are Toyota Solara's good, namely the 2001-2002 ones?

If you can suggest me a car I would really appreciate it. :)

if you are willing, get a bike, a 250 ninja will cost 4k new and that bike holds its resale value well.

if you are willing, get a bike, a 250 ninja will cost 4k new and that bike holds its resale value well.

Can't, my parents would freak out if I ride one and I don't know how to ride one. :p

I went to see a 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 today and I got it down to $4,200. Worth it? Are they good reliable cars? This compared with an 2002+ Alitma or 2000+ Maxima, which would be the best bang for the buck?

What about VW Passat's? They any good?

wow a honduh driver actually agrees that this is a stupid mod...there is hope for you.

I know what I like :p Rice and modifying a FWD daily driver isn't one of them. My Civic's a very reliable and fun little car for what it is. That's it. It's not fast, it's not a sports car and it can't beat vipers even if I dropped $4000 on a b18c engine that would barely double my horsepower. Seriously, you can buy an LS1 at that price lol...

Can't, my parents would freak out if I ride one and I don't know how to ride one. :p

I went to see a 2001 Honda Accord EX V6 today and I got it down to $4,200. Worth it? Are they good reliable cars? This compared with an 2002+ Alitma or 2000+ Maxima, which would be the best bang for the buck?

What about VW Passat's? They any good?

imo I would stick with honda or nissan or toyota. vw isn't known for quality. the accord ex is a very good and reliable car.

Well it's too late for the Honda now. :( The guy was supposed to hold it for me, but he sold it. People buy cars SO fast if they have good deals on them. :(

Don't worry there are a few hundred thousand more Hondas out there. You are not exactly looking for a Rembrandt here. You are looking for a car and not a rare one at that. There are tons out there already and they keep making more of em everyday. You will eventually find the car for you.

imo I would stick with honda or nissan or toyota. vw isn't known for quality. the accord ex is a very good and reliable car.

I found a 2002 VW Passat for $3900. It has 133,000 miles on it and he hit a pole in his building complex and the bumper in the front is dangling just a bit. See image:

xn96xg.jpg

It is a GLS 1.8T 4dr Sedan w/Automatic. Worth it? He said he can bring it down to like 3,300 because of the issue with the bumper and he is leaving the state.

you couldn't pay me to drive it. imo, keep looking. You almost found one in the accord. If you assist with a zip, I can help you with some autotrader/vehix/autoshopper/etc searching.

Why not? It has good reviews on edmunds: http://www.edmunds.com/volkswagen/passat/2002/review.html

Zip is: 90706.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!