Recommended Posts

Is there any way to get the "URL preview" back, like it was in beta 10, and turn off the "bloody stupid" status display in the bottom left corner?

1 - Not Yet

2- http://userstyles.org/styles/43680

#statusbar-display {
    display: none !important;}

Is there any way to get the "URL preview" back, like it was in beta 10, and turn off the "bloody stupid" status display in the bottom left corner?

evidently devs thinks chrome is better, since they felt the duty to copy it :/

evidently devs thinks chrome is better, since they felt the duty to copy it :/

It's not a beloved feature for every Chrome user! Here's one point of view:

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=3236567c895e1320&hl=en

So Fx 4 beta 11 won't even have an "either/or" option?

It's not a beloved feature for every Chrome user! Here's one point of view:

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=3236567c895e1320&hl=en

So Fx 4 beta 11 won't even have an "either/or" option?

Firefox has become a Chrome wannabee. I am disgusted with it.

I'm using Fx 4 beta 10 on Win XP with tabs on top and no menu bar.

I want to change the color of the space lying between the appmenu-button and the tabs, between each tab, and between the last tab on the right and the min/max/close buttons on the far right. Currently, this space is a solid-blue when Firefox is in focus and grey when any other window is active (Win XP defaults?).

hey can anyone gimme the script to make the empty navigation toolbar of minimal width, say 2 or 3 px. Currently its in this condition :

ff4b12prenav.png

why not right click and remove it?

this worked for me

#nav-bar {

height: 3px !important;

min-height: 0px !important;

overflow: hidden !important;

}

I'm using Fx 4 beta 10 on Win XP with tabs on top and no menu bar.

I want to change the color of the space lying between the appmenu-button and the tabs, between each tab, and between the last tab on the right and the min/max/close buttons on the far right. Currently, this space is a solid-blue when Firefox is in focus and grey when any other window is active (Win XP defaults?).

Got it...

#TabsToolbar { background: desired_color !important; } but the color doesn't change when the browser isn't in focus. Any idea about that?

Got it...

#TabsToolbar { background: desired_color !important; } but the color doesn't change when the browser isn't in focus. Any idea about that?

How about adding:

#TabsToolbar:hover{ background: desired_color !important; }

How about adding:

#TabsToolbar:hover{ background: desired_color !important; }

Gary, thanks! But I think what I want is like when I hit alt+tab to bring up a window of another program, say Notepad, the "desired_color" in the TabsToolbar area should be different to signify that Firefox is not the active window. Previously, without any code regarding TabsToolbar, the area would be a dark blue when Firefox was active and if I switched to another program, the area of the TabsToolbar not occupied by tabs would automatically turn grey.

In edit: this is with Firefox in a maximised window and the other program's window not maximized.

Gary, thanks! But I think what I want is like when I hit alt+tab to bring up a window of another program, say Notepad, the "desired_color" in the TabsToolbar area should be different to signify that Firefox is not the active window. Previously, without any code regarding TabsToolbar, the area would be a dark blue when Firefox was active and if I switched to another program, the area of the TabsToolbar not occupied by tabs would automatically turn grey.

In edit: this is with Firefox in a maximized window and the other program's window not maximized.

I guess something like this is involved ... #main-window[sizemode=maximized][tabsontop=true] but what happens next is beyond me.

Of course, I could just remove this bit (#TabsToolbar { background: maroon !important; }) and go back to the default colors ...

As promised. Let me know if there are any issues.

post-49492-0-54742900-1294174232.png

Download

Ok I realise its a late reply, but I just tracked this down to this extension:

capturevpk.png

What appears to happen is the address bar on popup windows and forms appears on the titlebar, and so not only can I not move the window, but I can't edit the address either. Thanks to Aero's chunky buttons and window glow, I can still use the window widgets, but nothing else!

Ok I realise its a late reply, but I just tracked this down to this extension:

http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/6349/capturevpk.png

What appears to happen is the address bar on popup windows and forms appears on the titlebar, and so not only can I not move the window, but I can't edit the address either. Thanks to Aero's chunky buttons and window glow, I can still use the window widgets, but nothing else!

I had this also when using this extension.

I guess something like this is involved ... #main-window[sizemode=maximized][tabsontop=true] but what happens next is beyond me.

Of course, I could just remove this bit (#TabsToolbar { background: maroon !important; }) and go back to the default colors ...

Did you see this, it's the solution to your problem:

What you need is

#TabsToolbar:-moz-window-inactive {background-color: red !important; }

Did you see this, it's the solution to your problem:

Thanks, foxxyn8. Was just what I needed.

Here's a slightly weird question ....

Once we decide we like some code, is it better to place it in userContent.css or userChrome.css and keep Stylish for code that won't work in userContent.css or userChrome.css? Of course, as long as something is being tested, Stylish is more convenient since a browser restart is not required.

Would that be more efficient in any way?

Personally, I just keep it all in stylish because it allows me to enable/disable on the fly which makes it easier to track conflicting styles and test new styles. There are also some things that just can't be styled using userChrome/userContent.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!