97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

What's the difficulty difference like between the practice league and the normal starter league? as i've played a few games in the practice league and i'm 5 games 5 wins 1v1, 4 games 2 wins 2v2, will this good streak continue if i click the dreaded 'skip' button on the practice league? :)

(oh and if you fancy a game details in sig!)

[edit]

wow i can't read this morning

it's hard to say how difficult as people tend to try to cheese their way through placement lol

if you don't scout the proxy or rush then it can be very hard. if you see it coming it'll be cake

My first upgrade is usually for attack.

Also Anaron we did 1v1 :) we know how that turned out. lol

I may or may not be the double rainbow guy all based on how you see things.

Terran with mass rines medics and thors, might seem hard.

( Forcefield your ramp)

Templars, With storm for the rines, and Feedback the medics, If you have Temps, usually you can get DTS so if its a late game, they wont scan if its an epic battle.

2 immortals will take the tanks while other units tear them up. It seems like alot to do, but terrans always go all in so if you tear through that and have enough forces left, just counter hit them right away.

My first upgrade is usually for attack.

Also Anaron we did 1v1 :) we know how that turned out. lol

I may or may not be the double rainbow guy all based on how you see things.

Terran with mass rines medics and thors, might seem hard.

( Forcefield your ramp)

Templars, With storm for the rines, and Feedback the medics, If you have Temps, usually you can get DTS so if its a late game, they wont scan if its an epic battle.

2 immortals will take the tanks while other units tear them up. It seems like alot to do, but terrans always go all in so if you tear through that and have enough forces left, just counter hit them right away.

Yes, I failed horribly by moving my high templars out of position. I had 3 of them with full energy (plus psi-storm) and a sentry with full energy for force fields. If I left the HTs alone, they would've tore your army apart and I would've quickly countered. I want a rematch though. :p

I love HTs(P Storm all the way!), I have owned people with those and carriers lol.. I also got back into my archon strat that I used to use in SC I which is great against a lot especially tech'ed up fully.

When I upgrade I typically do two armor upgrades first then weapons and that gives me the huge advantage for the most part in battles.

Ive been skipping terran lately just too burned out using them. Been doing some sexy strats with Zerg, and Toss.

40 Speedling rush.

Normal build except fast gas, nad mass larva stockpile, if done right you can annhilate almost 3 players probes.

I also go banelings with it, so if its a ran i mass 40 banes and boom blow up the way blow up their units and then rush their probes.

Ive been skipping terran lately just too burned out using them. Been doing some sexy strats with Zerg, and Toss.

40 Speedling rush.

Normal build except fast gas, nad mass larva stockpile, if done right you can annhilate almost 3 players probes.

I also go banelings with it, so if its a ran i mass 40 banes and boom blow up the way blow up their units and then rush their probes.

I am trying your strat, but its not working for me; how do you do this?

Gotta love last minute problems. Funny thing is, my DVD Drive has been shot for the last 3 years lol. **** me if tomorrow I pop my dvd in and it doesnt work.

Its shot, because I chose Lite On for my DVD Drive. Big mistake. first 6 months i used it and made copies of linux distros, windows etc etc etc, motor went out. Now it whines anytime, and especially with a disc in. Hits full speeds and whines bad. Ive already had to pull it out once because it broke one of my discs.

Oh well, we will see tomorrow.

Btw, **** YOU ALL WHO HAVE THE POSTER AND THE GAME! ALL OF YOU!

I get no poster or ****!

Oh well, i get collectors, hopefully that in itself is awesome :)

Lite-ON is *far* from the worst company for DVD drives (even DVD burners); most of the early DVD drives and burners *not* manufactured by Sony/Philips were re-branded Lite-ON drives (including early DVD burners and drives from ASUS and MSI, and those in most PCs from Dell and even HP). I have a Lite-ON LDW-411S; it is, in fact, my last PATA drive (as both hard drives, and my other DVD burner, are SATA). Still soldiering on despite dating back to when Windows Vista was in early beta. It is *regularly* r\used and abused (usually burning Linux distros and recovery media, along with the odd audio CD). It's still in use due to the ability (that the newer Samsung SH-223B lacks) to burn reliably at low speeds to CD-RW media.

How on earth is THAT hot? :wacko:

Remember; Infestation is like a Zerg Suit (in Kerrigan's case, it fits her like one of those racing Speedos). Once you get past the Zerg Suit, Kerrigan *is* hot.

Why are you glad that you never played the beta, the campaign was was part of it :unsure:

Separate beta (the majority of the testing was MP; very few of us got to test the SP at all, and no, I wasn't one of them).

I found the SP campaign actually fun (I'm not good enough to play on Brutal, as I am way too lacking in experience) and there are a truckload of *in* jokes from Anthology. (I *still* want to feed Arcturus Mengsk to a Nydus Worm, though.)

Separate beta (the majority of the testing was MP; very few of us got to test the SP at all, and no, I wasn't one of them).

I found the SP campaign actually fun (I'm not good enough to play on Brutal, as I am way too lacking in experience) and there are a truckload of *in* jokes from Anthology. (I *still* want to feed Arcturus Mengsk to a Nydus Worm, though.)

yes I know, it was a typo.

If you guys ever want to learn strats and stuff, feel free to add me.

[email protected]

Its my real ID, just make sure you put neowin and who you are on neowin in the message portion.

Ill be on all weekend. Now only if Sikh got on when he says he will :D

Soloing my Speed ling strat is hard.

To solo it it takes a little longer.

Need to get first expo right at the start, hopefully your enemy doesnt pay much attention or rushes.

Get a spawning pool at 14 drones on minerals, get a gas started with 2 drones, build 3 more drones start pumping a few overlords. Once spawning pool is done build lings and 1 queen at each hatch. You should have built up enough gas to get your speedling upgrade. start it then do larva spawn your hatches, until you have produced 40 sets of lings. You should have 40 by the time the upgrades done then go in for the kill. If you see terran, just do baneling speedling. Blow their wall rush a few lings in with banes blow up their stuff then send in mass force.

Patch 1.1 current info...

To begin, we've heard a lot of feedback from our global community about standardized hotkey options. We're happy to announce that in patch 1.1 we are going to make the Standard (US) and Standard for Lefties (US) hotkey options available in all regions.

Balance Changes

We have several balance changes in store. One general change we're making is that friendly units will no longer provide vision after being killed. Enemy units previously revealed will no longer be targetable. Now let's break down the additional balance changes we're implementing.

Maps

We're going to be adding destructible rocks to the Desert Oasis map to make natural expansions easier to protect. In addition, the center map watchtower area is being narrowed.

Protoss

We have two key changes in mind for the zealot: the build time is being increased from 33 to 38 seconds, and the warpgate cooldown is being increased from 23 to 28 seconds. Zealot rushes are currently too powerful at various skill levels, particularly those that rely on rapidly assaulting an enemy base from nearby "proxy" gateways. We feel the window players have to scout for and fend off this rush is too small. We also want to address the problem of protoss being able to dump minerals a bit too quickly with the combination of warpgates and Chrono Boost.

Terran

There are several changes in the works for terrans. Reapers against zerg are stronger than expected. Due to the zealot build time increase, reapers would be a bit problematic in combination with proxy barracks, bunkers, and/or marauders against protoss. Therefore, we have decided to increase the build time of reapers as well from 40 to 45 seconds. Fast reaper + bunker, or fast marine + bunker rushes are problematic against zerg. Although this rush would never outright destroy the zerg player, we feel zerg suffers too much of a disadvantage from either having to cancel the fast expansion, or getting trapped inside the main base for too long, so we are also increasing the bunker build time from 30 to 35 seconds.

Siege tanks in large numbers are performing too well in all matchups. In the mid- to late-game, siege tanks are too dominant against all ground units. We want a small set of light and unarmored ground units to perform better against siege tanks. With this in mind, we're changing the Siege Mode damage of the siege tank from 50 to 35, +15 vs. armored; to correspond with this, damage upgrades will be changed from +5 to +3, +2 vs. armored. This change reduces the base damage of the siege tank against light and unarmored units, as well as the splash damage.

Battlecruisers currently lack good counters from the ground and still perform very well against a wide array of unit types. We're aware that it is not easy to get battlecruisers out for the cost, but at the same time, it is possible in both 1v1s and team games to create stalemate situations to bring them out. Overall, we feel that battlecruisers are too strong for their cost, and the terran-forced stalemate situations are causing less interesting gameplay. We will be lowering their damage against ground units from 10 to 8.

Zerg

Ultralisk damage is being decreased from 15, +25 vs. armored to 15, +20 vs. armored. This reduction is comparable to the changes being made to the battlecruiser and siege tank. Like the battlecruiser, ultralisks are simply too powerful for the cost, even though they are difficult to muster. Also, in combination with other units, ultralisks are difficult to counter from the ground. The ultralisk building attack (Ram) is being removed because the damage rate is too similar to its normal attack, which will be used against buildings instead. When ultralisks target tightly packed smaller buildings such as supply depots, the Ram attack is actually outputting considerably less overall damage than its normal attack, as Ram only hits a single target.

And Beyond...

We are reading your posts on the forums and creating lists of features and bugs to address in future patches. We have mid- to long-term plans to further evolve the Custom Game experience, and soon, enhance our social features with the addition of chat channels. We will be sharing more specific information in the coming weeks. As with all of our previous games, we will support StarCraft II for many years to come. Your feedback and participation is critical in making this not only the best game it can be, but also the most engaged gaming community in the world. We look forward to the implementation of patch 1.1, as well as sharing our plans for our future gameplay and Battle.net features.

I feel the tanks damage shouldnt of been dropped so low, because if you get one tank out before mass rine wave hits you, the marines arent going to scatter instead they will live through the tanks blast and come tear it to pieces.

Mass hydra also are still a problem. Tanks Price should be raised or supply cost and keep the same damage.

Zealots time is being increased because people are to lazy to scout...GG to those people that fail at the game then.

Yea, its stupid. Blizzard are trying to make scouting a not-so-big factor. Damn the casual gamers! :(

I feel the tanks damage shouldnt of been dropped so low, because if you get one tank out before mass rine wave hits you, the marines arent going to scatter instead they will live through the tanks blast and come tear it to pieces.

Mass hydra also are still a problem. Tanks Price should be raised or supply cost and keep the same damage.

Or both things, decrease the damage, but slightly, like 5 or something, not 15, and increase the costs slightly (15~20 minerals/gas).

Yea, its stupid. Blizzard are trying to make scouting a not-so-big factor. Damn the casual gamers! :(

You don't even need to scout to know there's a proxy coming. You can almost always see the probe in your base first.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!