97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

That's your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I won't discuss this any further as I don't think it's allowed per say the forum rules.

You can discuss it as long as you don't provide any download links.

Anyway, I've been playing a custom game called Storm of the Imperial Sanctum lately and it's really good.

What is SotIS?

Storm of the Imperial Sanctum is a custom UMS for the Blizzard product Starcraft 2. Designed around the traditional AoS architecture, SotIS attempts to bring hero-based gameplay into the world of Starcraft, while maintaining the world-class visual presentation that Blizzard's Havok engine provides. Our design philosophy intends to produce gameplay that is familiar yet refreshing to both new and seasoned gamers alike.

Similar to predecessing AoS games such as Defense of the Ancients, Heroes of Newerth, and League of Legends - SotIS revolves heavily around hero-based gameplay. However, unlike such designs, SotIS introduces an element in the form of mercenaries, whose role in the game is to aid the early-game progress of your primary hero character. This inclusion should give rise to new forms of gameplay that require the unique micro and macro skills of the more RTS-focused player.

http://playsotis.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=169&Itemid=136

  • 4 weeks later...

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

Switch to air immediately... Don't play a fixed build, play a flexible build that uses scouting as the main weapon.

Switch to air immediately... Don't play a fixed build, play a flexible build that uses scouting as the main weapon.

Well right now scouting is a pain as my practice matches their are a ton of debris walls to prevent scouting and slow down the rush. When I push air is it all void rays? Or are carriers a good choice too.

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

A 4-warp gate is effective if you can make it happen around the 6:30-7:00 mark. It's a rush: if it doesn't catch your opponent off-guard, it won't work very well.

Gateway units are effective in the early game but you have to tech to unlock Protoss's power. You need colossi to deal with your ennemy's ground army, blink to make stalkers way more mobile and effective, charge for your zealots, phoenixes to harass, immortals to deal with large tank counts, etc. Staying stuck on purely Gateway tech is a classic beginner mistake.

A 4-warp gate is effective if you can make it happen around the 6:30-7:00 mark. It's a rush: if it doesn't catch your opponent off-guard, it won't work very well.

Gateway units are effective in the early game but you have to tech to unlock Protoss's power. You need colossi to deal with your ennemy's ground army, blink to make stalkers way more mobile and effective, charge for your zealots, phoenixes to harass, immortals to deal with large tank counts, etc. Staying stuck on purely Gateway tech is a classic beginner mistake.

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

Once you have 4-5 zealots / stalkers / whatever. Meaning, you should be expanding after / while building a second tier structure (Stargate, Twilight Council, Robotics Bay).

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

Look at some of the common build orders to get your started.

I would suggest a 3-gate expand rather than 4-gate. The 3-gate expand gives you enough units to defend against most early game attacks while also allowing you to safely expand. 3-gate expand is the bread and butter of most macro Protoss.

Can anyone recommend a good mechanical keyboard thats is NOT a widow? I use my laptop keyboard and a Deathadder right now.

Unless you like throwing money around, personally, I would not get a mechanical keyboard. They don't increase your playing ability and, in fact, many of the top Korean players use very cheap keyboards.

What they do is pry out the non-hotkey keys so you can't mistype.

http://sc2pod.com/trackers/community/?id=2029

http://media.photobucket.com/image/korean%20starcraft%20keyboard%20remove%20key/ihatett/normal_boxerkeyboard_2.jpg

If you really want a mechanical keyboard, I would check out Das Keyboard. I've heard good things about them and they cater to a hardcore crowd.

Well right now scouting is a pain as my practice matches their are a ton of debris walls to prevent scouting and slow down the rush. When I push air is it all void rays? Or are carriers a good choice too.

SCII is ridiculously easy compared to SC:BW. Just send a miner to wherever the starting positions are, you can see them on the minimap and he'll find his own way, unlike BW, where they would literally just stop unless you direct them manually :s.

About air: don't, you're not going to win a 200/200 battle against any race with just air (on a map where ground fighting units are mobile). Void rays are mostly for early harrass against Terran. As in 1gate > cyber (stalker) > stargate (void ray) > (warp gate research). 2 max, otherwise you're eco is going to take a massive hit and it won't be worth it. You don't wanna do it against Zerg because by the time you have 1, they should have or almost have 2 Queens out. Don't do it against Protoss because stalkers pick em off easy. Terran Marines are outranged, so with good back and forth micro, a void ray should pick off a few marines and with proper use of the terrain, SCVs are there for the picking. Phoenix's are really good here with the pick up technique thing they do.

Carriers are just a generally no no NO. By the time you have a sufficient force to do any damage, you're gonna run into Zerg Infester fungal growth, devastating and easy pickings for Corruptor or Hydralisks. Terran vikings outrange Carriers and stim Marines cut down interceptors easily.. Protoss Stalker, Archon, Templar (storm). Just don't go Carriers.

  • 3 weeks later...

protoss here anyone know of any good guides to read as I really suck playing online....

There are several - still, the best is watching matches from the better players.

TeamLiquid - home to several of the best players from all over - also has a forum that has linkage to replays from those players.

Natually, they *also* have replay linkage from n00bs like moi - so you can see what *not* to do...:)

http://www.teamliquid.net (free registration is a requirement to post, but not to browse)

SCII is ridiculously easy compared to SC:BW. Just send a miner to wherever the starting positions are, you can see them on the minimap and he'll find his own way, unlike BW, where they would literally just stop unless you direct them manually :s.

About air: don't, you're not going to win a 200/200 battle against any race with just air (on a map where ground fighting units are mobile). Void rays are mostly for early harrass against Terran. As in 1gate > cyber (stalker) > stargate (void ray) > (warp gate research). 2 max, otherwise you're eco is going to take a massive hit and it won't be worth it. You don't wanna do it against Zerg because by the time you have 1, they should have or almost have 2 Queens out. Don't do it against Protoss because stalkers pick em off easy. Terran Marines are outranged, so with good back and forth micro, a void ray should pick off a few marines and with proper use of the terrain, SCVs are there for the picking. Phoenix's are really good here with the pick up technique thing they do.

Carriers are just a generally no no NO. By the time you have a sufficient force to do any damage, you're gonna run into Zerg Infester fungal growth, devastating and easy pickings for Corruptor or Hydralisks. Terran vikings outrange Carriers and stim Marines cut down interceptors easily.. Protoss Stalker, Archon, Templar (storm). Just don't go Carriers.

Carriers are definitely a standalone no-no unless you already have a crapton of air (mixes of VR/Phoenix), are WAY ahead, and looking to push a checkmate/endgame (in which case you should followup with the Mothership, and surround it with mixed air units (Void Rays, Phoenixes, and possible even a Shuttle or six carrying anti-air ground units and an assault force to *plow the road*)). Also, even with air, never never NEVER deploy a single unit type if avoidable! Deploying a mixed bag makes counters that much more difficult - which is always a good thing.

Seriously? A 200 supply all / majority air army works? You in the Purple League or something? If I as a player am letting another to safely transition into carriers from any sort of starting build, then I'd be very disappointed in myself indeed. I should say, Viking probably have the same range as Carriers, but hit and runs combined with the Vikings superior speed make up for that.

I seen people win going straight void rays, I guess what happens is they have one or more of their teammates feed them (gas mainly I'm assuming) and they got about 10+ by the 20min marker, they roll in from back and charge up and yeah....

I personally don't those all-ins as you are screwed once you lost those units..

It'd be very hard for me to lose to pure void rays. If I scout your base and see that you went double gas, I'll assume you're either going for robo tech or air. And in that case, I'll continue to scout while producing stalkers and getting blink. I'm fairly confident a delayed 4-gate can also beat a void ray build.

Anyway, has patch 1.4 been released yet? I'm really looking forward to the immortal range buff.

I've come to the conclusion that I just can't play this game, I have a friend at work who plays it LOADS and he keeps going on at me about macroing my abilities up and getting a tight build order and early expoing etc. I just can't get the hang of it :p

The latest balance change to the upcoming patch (1.4) is causing a stir on the Battle.net forums: "Infestor?s Neural Parasite can no longer target Massive units."

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/3393687#blog

As a Protoss player, it was really annoying when a Zerg player manages to use neural parasite on one of your colossi. It didn't happen often but when it did, I was faced with the choice of either sniping the infestor or taking out the colossus to minimize my losses.

The latest balance change to the upcoming patch (1.4) is causing a stir on the Battle.net forums: "Infestor?s Neural Parasite can no longer target Massive units."

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/3393687#blog

As a Protoss player, it was really annoying when a Zerg player manages to use neural parasite on one of your colossi. It didn't happen often but when it did, I was faced with the choice of either sniping the infestor or taking out the colossus to minimize my losses.

Well as IdrA said, the whole purpose of NP was to take out selected key units in your opponent's army, and these often happen to be massive: colossi, thors, archons, mothership. With that nerf, NP will only be marginally useful to take siege tanks, immortals and... that's it. Basically there won't be a good reason to get it.

A lot of the other changes are good though, especially barracks build time delayed by 5 seconds. Should kill the stupid 11/11 barracks build, hopefully.

By the way if you're looking for serious SC2 strategy discussion don't go to the battle.net forums. teamliquid.net is where it's at.

Well as IdrA said, the whole purpose of NP was to take out selected key units in your opponent's army, and these often happen to be massive: colossi, thors, archons, mothership. With that nerf, NP will only be marginally useful to take siege tanks, immortals and... that's it. Basically there won't be a good reason to get it.

A lot of the other changes are good though, especially barracks build time delayed by 5 seconds. Should kill the stupid 11/11 barracks build, hopefully.

By the way if you're looking for serious SC2 strategy discussion don't go to the battle.net forums. teamliquid.net is where it's at.

I understand that it's useful for taking out massive units and the removal of that aspect of the ability is a huge blow to infestors. Fortunately for non-Zerg players, it means worrying less about neural parasite and more about fungal growth. That ability is insanely effective against Terran and Protoss. In a lot of cases, over 75% of my army is taken out because of a few well-placed fungal growths. It's even more annoying when a bunch of your stalkers are taken out quite easily rather than zealots.

I'm glad they delayed the barracks build time because I found the 1/1/1 build to be both annoying and cheap. Anyway, it's funny you mentioned teamliquid.net because I just recently reset my password for my account there just to start posting around (to discuss Protoss strategy).

I think they should have found another way to fix what they perceived as a problem. I think what they did is kind of an overreaction. I mean yeah it sucks if you play against a zerg player that goes heavy infestors and then NPs your meaty units and fungal spams your other units. I've been caught off guard and absolutely pounded by that .. but I don't think it was overpowered, I liked the unforgiving nature of it and it taught me to position my important things better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!