97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

That's your opinion, and you are entitled to it. I won't discuss this any further as I don't think it's allowed per say the forum rules.

You can discuss it as long as you don't provide any download links.

Anyway, I've been playing a custom game called Storm of the Imperial Sanctum lately and it's really good.

What is SotIS?

Storm of the Imperial Sanctum is a custom UMS for the Blizzard product Starcraft 2. Designed around the traditional AoS architecture, SotIS attempts to bring hero-based gameplay into the world of Starcraft, while maintaining the world-class visual presentation that Blizzard's Havok engine provides. Our design philosophy intends to produce gameplay that is familiar yet refreshing to both new and seasoned gamers alike.

Similar to predecessing AoS games such as Defense of the Ancients, Heroes of Newerth, and League of Legends - SotIS revolves heavily around hero-based gameplay. However, unlike such designs, SotIS introduces an element in the form of mercenaries, whose role in the game is to aid the early-game progress of your primary hero character. This inclusion should give rise to new forms of gameplay that require the unique micro and macro skills of the more RTS-focused player.

http://playsotis.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=169&Itemid=136

  • 4 weeks later...

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

Switch to air immediately... Don't play a fixed build, play a flexible build that uses scouting as the main weapon.

Switch to air immediately... Don't play a fixed build, play a flexible build that uses scouting as the main weapon.

Well right now scouting is a pain as my practice matches their are a ton of debris walls to prevent scouting and slow down the rush. When I push air is it all void rays? Or are carriers a good choice too.

ok so somehow 2 of my friends got me into mulitplayer. I am working on learning 4 gate protoss but have gotten killed by Maurader spam and got caught with my main army gone by those flying things from zerg. For maurader spam what can I do to counter that? Right now I am focusing on stalker/sentrys from my gates and even with shields up they got pounded.

A 4-warp gate is effective if you can make it happen around the 6:30-7:00 mark. It's a rush: if it doesn't catch your opponent off-guard, it won't work very well.

Gateway units are effective in the early game but you have to tech to unlock Protoss's power. You need colossi to deal with your ennemy's ground army, blink to make stalkers way more mobile and effective, charge for your zealots, phoenixes to harass, immortals to deal with large tank counts, etc. Staying stuck on purely Gateway tech is a classic beginner mistake.

A 4-warp gate is effective if you can make it happen around the 6:30-7:00 mark. It's a rush: if it doesn't catch your opponent off-guard, it won't work very well.

Gateway units are effective in the early game but you have to tech to unlock Protoss's power. You need colossi to deal with your ennemy's ground army, blink to make stalkers way more mobile and effective, charge for your zealots, phoenixes to harass, immortals to deal with large tank counts, etc. Staying stuck on purely Gateway tech is a classic beginner mistake.

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

Once you have 4-5 zealots / stalkers / whatever. Meaning, you should be expanding after / while building a second tier structure (Stargate, Twilight Council, Robotics Bay).

I've been grabbing my upgrades for my gateway units and building immortals but I feel like I just never have the resources to go further then those units. When should I expand to another base?

Look at some of the common build orders to get your started.

I would suggest a 3-gate expand rather than 4-gate. The 3-gate expand gives you enough units to defend against most early game attacks while also allowing you to safely expand. 3-gate expand is the bread and butter of most macro Protoss.

Can anyone recommend a good mechanical keyboard thats is NOT a widow? I use my laptop keyboard and a Deathadder right now.

Unless you like throwing money around, personally, I would not get a mechanical keyboard. They don't increase your playing ability and, in fact, many of the top Korean players use very cheap keyboards.

What they do is pry out the non-hotkey keys so you can't mistype.

http://sc2pod.com/trackers/community/?id=2029

http://media.photobucket.com/image/korean%20starcraft%20keyboard%20remove%20key/ihatett/normal_boxerkeyboard_2.jpg

If you really want a mechanical keyboard, I would check out Das Keyboard. I've heard good things about them and they cater to a hardcore crowd.

Well right now scouting is a pain as my practice matches their are a ton of debris walls to prevent scouting and slow down the rush. When I push air is it all void rays? Or are carriers a good choice too.

SCII is ridiculously easy compared to SC:BW. Just send a miner to wherever the starting positions are, you can see them on the minimap and he'll find his own way, unlike BW, where they would literally just stop unless you direct them manually :s.

About air: don't, you're not going to win a 200/200 battle against any race with just air (on a map where ground fighting units are mobile). Void rays are mostly for early harrass against Terran. As in 1gate > cyber (stalker) > stargate (void ray) > (warp gate research). 2 max, otherwise you're eco is going to take a massive hit and it won't be worth it. You don't wanna do it against Zerg because by the time you have 1, they should have or almost have 2 Queens out. Don't do it against Protoss because stalkers pick em off easy. Terran Marines are outranged, so with good back and forth micro, a void ray should pick off a few marines and with proper use of the terrain, SCVs are there for the picking. Phoenix's are really good here with the pick up technique thing they do.

Carriers are just a generally no no NO. By the time you have a sufficient force to do any damage, you're gonna run into Zerg Infester fungal growth, devastating and easy pickings for Corruptor or Hydralisks. Terran vikings outrange Carriers and stim Marines cut down interceptors easily.. Protoss Stalker, Archon, Templar (storm). Just don't go Carriers.

  • 3 weeks later...

protoss here anyone know of any good guides to read as I really suck playing online....

There are several - still, the best is watching matches from the better players.

TeamLiquid - home to several of the best players from all over - also has a forum that has linkage to replays from those players.

Natually, they *also* have replay linkage from n00bs like moi - so you can see what *not* to do...:)

http://www.teamliquid.net (free registration is a requirement to post, but not to browse)

SCII is ridiculously easy compared to SC:BW. Just send a miner to wherever the starting positions are, you can see them on the minimap and he'll find his own way, unlike BW, where they would literally just stop unless you direct them manually :s.

About air: don't, you're not going to win a 200/200 battle against any race with just air (on a map where ground fighting units are mobile). Void rays are mostly for early harrass against Terran. As in 1gate > cyber (stalker) > stargate (void ray) > (warp gate research). 2 max, otherwise you're eco is going to take a massive hit and it won't be worth it. You don't wanna do it against Zerg because by the time you have 1, they should have or almost have 2 Queens out. Don't do it against Protoss because stalkers pick em off easy. Terran Marines are outranged, so with good back and forth micro, a void ray should pick off a few marines and with proper use of the terrain, SCVs are there for the picking. Phoenix's are really good here with the pick up technique thing they do.

Carriers are just a generally no no NO. By the time you have a sufficient force to do any damage, you're gonna run into Zerg Infester fungal growth, devastating and easy pickings for Corruptor or Hydralisks. Terran vikings outrange Carriers and stim Marines cut down interceptors easily.. Protoss Stalker, Archon, Templar (storm). Just don't go Carriers.

Carriers are definitely a standalone no-no unless you already have a crapton of air (mixes of VR/Phoenix), are WAY ahead, and looking to push a checkmate/endgame (in which case you should followup with the Mothership, and surround it with mixed air units (Void Rays, Phoenixes, and possible even a Shuttle or six carrying anti-air ground units and an assault force to *plow the road*)). Also, even with air, never never NEVER deploy a single unit type if avoidable! Deploying a mixed bag makes counters that much more difficult - which is always a good thing.

Seriously? A 200 supply all / majority air army works? You in the Purple League or something? If I as a player am letting another to safely transition into carriers from any sort of starting build, then I'd be very disappointed in myself indeed. I should say, Viking probably have the same range as Carriers, but hit and runs combined with the Vikings superior speed make up for that.

I seen people win going straight void rays, I guess what happens is they have one or more of their teammates feed them (gas mainly I'm assuming) and they got about 10+ by the 20min marker, they roll in from back and charge up and yeah....

I personally don't those all-ins as you are screwed once you lost those units..

It'd be very hard for me to lose to pure void rays. If I scout your base and see that you went double gas, I'll assume you're either going for robo tech or air. And in that case, I'll continue to scout while producing stalkers and getting blink. I'm fairly confident a delayed 4-gate can also beat a void ray build.

Anyway, has patch 1.4 been released yet? I'm really looking forward to the immortal range buff.

I've come to the conclusion that I just can't play this game, I have a friend at work who plays it LOADS and he keeps going on at me about macroing my abilities up and getting a tight build order and early expoing etc. I just can't get the hang of it :p

The latest balance change to the upcoming patch (1.4) is causing a stir on the Battle.net forums: "Infestor?s Neural Parasite can no longer target Massive units."

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/3393687#blog

As a Protoss player, it was really annoying when a Zerg player manages to use neural parasite on one of your colossi. It didn't happen often but when it did, I was faced with the choice of either sniping the infestor or taking out the colossus to minimize my losses.

The latest balance change to the upcoming patch (1.4) is causing a stir on the Battle.net forums: "Infestor?s Neural Parasite can no longer target Massive units."

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/3393687#blog

As a Protoss player, it was really annoying when a Zerg player manages to use neural parasite on one of your colossi. It didn't happen often but when it did, I was faced with the choice of either sniping the infestor or taking out the colossus to minimize my losses.

Well as IdrA said, the whole purpose of NP was to take out selected key units in your opponent's army, and these often happen to be massive: colossi, thors, archons, mothership. With that nerf, NP will only be marginally useful to take siege tanks, immortals and... that's it. Basically there won't be a good reason to get it.

A lot of the other changes are good though, especially barracks build time delayed by 5 seconds. Should kill the stupid 11/11 barracks build, hopefully.

By the way if you're looking for serious SC2 strategy discussion don't go to the battle.net forums. teamliquid.net is where it's at.

Well as IdrA said, the whole purpose of NP was to take out selected key units in your opponent's army, and these often happen to be massive: colossi, thors, archons, mothership. With that nerf, NP will only be marginally useful to take siege tanks, immortals and... that's it. Basically there won't be a good reason to get it.

A lot of the other changes are good though, especially barracks build time delayed by 5 seconds. Should kill the stupid 11/11 barracks build, hopefully.

By the way if you're looking for serious SC2 strategy discussion don't go to the battle.net forums. teamliquid.net is where it's at.

I understand that it's useful for taking out massive units and the removal of that aspect of the ability is a huge blow to infestors. Fortunately for non-Zerg players, it means worrying less about neural parasite and more about fungal growth. That ability is insanely effective against Terran and Protoss. In a lot of cases, over 75% of my army is taken out because of a few well-placed fungal growths. It's even more annoying when a bunch of your stalkers are taken out quite easily rather than zealots.

I'm glad they delayed the barracks build time because I found the 1/1/1 build to be both annoying and cheap. Anyway, it's funny you mentioned teamliquid.net because I just recently reset my password for my account there just to start posting around (to discuss Protoss strategy).

I think they should have found another way to fix what they perceived as a problem. I think what they did is kind of an overreaction. I mean yeah it sucks if you play against a zerg player that goes heavy infestors and then NPs your meaty units and fungal spams your other units. I've been caught off guard and absolutely pounded by that .. but I don't think it was overpowered, I liked the unforgiving nature of it and it taught me to position my important things better.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You sound like some eastern Ukrainians before the war: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!