97 members have voted

  1. 1. What race do you play as (the most)?

    • Protoss
      36
    • Terran
      38
    • Zerg
      14
    • Random
      9


Recommended Posts

I like what they're doing for the zerg race. The new Viper seems insanely useful; the speed upgrade for hydralisks should make them less horrible at everything; and I can't wait to see the new "artillery" unit that shoots Locusts. Zergs got their own Siege Tanks now!

I like what they're doing for the zerg race. The new Viper seems insanely useful; the speed upgrade for hydralisks should make them less horrible at everything; and I can't wait to see the new "artillery" unit that shoots Locusts. Zergs got their own Siege Tanks now!

The viper is definitely scary. As a Protoss player, I'd be really angry if my colossus was pulled down a cliff or our of my ball of gateway units. The off-creep speed upgrade for hydralisks is also something to fear. Any good Protoss or Zerg player knows that they're quite effective against gateway units. The new Protoss units are good but as always, they're expensive.

I like the new Nexus abilities: Arc Shield and Mass Recall.

The first ability adds additional shields and armour to any targeted building as well as a weapon similar to the photon cannon. I read that it can only target light units but I don't know if that is confirmed. Also, it has huge potential for cheese tactics (e.g. arc shield on stolen vespene geyser/in-base pylon). The second ability allows the player to teleport units home.

For those that aren't in the loop with the new MP details for Heart of the Swarm, you can read about it here.

The viper is definitely scary. As a Protoss player, I'd be really angry if my colossus was pulled down a cliff or our of my ball of gateway units. The off-creep speed upgrade for hydralisks is also something to fear. Any good Protoss or Zerg player knows that they're quite effective against gateway units. The new Protoss units are good but as always, they're expensive.

^ this, i am going to be rage quitting if my giraffes where being pulled down into zerg army :|

^ this, i am going to be rage quitting if my giraffes where being pulled down into zerg army :|

Someones a viewer of lagtv... :laugh:

I'm not sure how I feel about the new units though. The multiplayer in SC2 is way to infuriating for me so I'll hold off on buying this game until it's on sale.

I was at BlizzCon again this year, and Blizzard DOTA is seriously amazing. I can't wait for it to be released.

I also came in here to share a link that I think may be useful to other SC noobs like myself: http://day9.tv/archives/?search=Newbie. Scroll to the bottom and just start watching them one by one. It's so great to have various aspects of the game or strategies explained completely. I've got some friends who are pretty skilled (one in Masters), but they just can't seem to explain as well as Day[9] does. And even though these are called "Newbie Tuesday," they're for players up to Gold.

Hope this helps ;)

Ok Season 4 is better than I thought. Despite originally saying that the map pool would remain untouched, they still removed Searing Crater (********* map ever made) and replaced it with Metalopolis (best Blizzard-made map). So that's one very nice touch.

Among other news, I finally got placed in Master league. :cool:

post-138285-0-25710100-1319608860_thumb.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I wonder if Heart of the Swarm will encourage the use of tier 3 units. A lot of times, regular players and professionals alike will use tier 1, 1.5, and 2 units over tier 3 units because they're cheaper to produce (and take less time to produce as well). How often do you even see Battlecruisers, Carriers, or Ultralisks in a regular game? I'm currently in Diamond for 2v2 random and the last time I saw a tier 3 unit in a league game was months ago. My teammate and I went up against two macro-heavy Zerg players that used Ultralisks which were easily taken out by my Immortal/Colossi/Void Ray death ball. Anyway, I feel as though the new tier 3 Protoss unit will be just as useless as the Carrier it's going to replace.

I wonder if Heart of the Swarm will encourage the use of tier 3 units. A lot of times, regular players and professionals alike will use tier 1, 1.5, and 2 units over tier 3 units because they're cheaper to produce (and take less time to produce as well). How often do you even see Battlecruisers, Carriers, or Ultralisks in a regular game?

Battlecruisers are often seen in lategame TvT. Carriers are a useless unit, but only because the Colossus already fills the "siege" unit role better, and the Colossus is T3 as well (Robo + specific tech building). Ultras just suck, but Broodlords are a common occurence in all matchups especially ZvT.

To get T3 units you're supposed to have a solid T1-T2 army to support it. The problem is that players will usually try to end the game before that, and with uneven skill levels and the element of surprise, especially at lower levels, it usually works. I think the game is well designed if players of equal skill, who understand what their opponent is doing, often transition into lategame. And that's basically what we're seeing, at least at the pro level. Considering how immature the metagame is, it's really not bad I think.

Battlecruisers are often seen in lategame TvT. Carriers are a useless unit, but only because the Colossus already fills the "siege" unit role better, and the Colossus is T3 as well (Robo + specific tech building). Ultras just suck, but Broodlords are a common occurence in all matchups especially ZvT.

To get T3 units you're supposed to have a solid T1-T2 army to support it. The problem is that players will usually try to end the game before that, and with uneven skill levels and the element of surprise, especially at lower levels, it usually works. I think the game is well designed if players of equal skill, who understand what their opponent is doing, often transition into lategame. And that's basically what we're seeing, at least at the pro level. Considering how immature the metagame is, it's really not bad I think.

When I said T3 units, I meant T3 air units. :pinch:

I've been playing some 1v1 league matches and so far, all I've seen is Brood Lords. I'll probably see Battlecruisers if I go against more Terrans and I doubt I'll see Carriers. Right now, Carriers seem like the most worthless unit for Protoss. It's expensive, slow, and it's easily taken out by lower-tier units.

It's definitely worth it for $29.99. Anyway, my friend and I finally made it into diamond league for 2v2. We're currently ranked 5 and it's about damn time. We actually went against masters league players. I'm also playing 1v1 league matches which is something I rarely do. I usually just play custom games to play maps that I like.

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Patch 1.5 Is Coming

The upcoming 1.5 patch will be our most feature-laden patch to date. This patch represents the first steps towards the release of our first expansion for StarCraft II, Heart of the Swarm, and will include numerous upgrades and fixes throughout the game. One of the most significant additions will be the all new Arcade feature which includes improved custom game visibility, ratings, reviews, game instructions, screenshot support, and more. Patch 1.5 will also include significant improvements throughout the overall user interface, streaming support, antialiasing, editor and modding upgrades, new art tools, and more. We?ll go into further details about these features in future developer updates. In this update, I would like to provide some insight into the thinking and motivation behind a few of the upcoming changes.

Source: StarCraft II Blog

It's about time they added antialiasing support.

  • Like 1
  • 3 months later...

Source: StarCraft II Blog

It's about time they added antialiasing support.

Well, if you have a BattleNet account that includes StarCraft II (yes - that includes the Starter Edition) you can test out the 1.5.0 patch before it goes live, as a new installer has been built around it (it does NOT replace the existing Starcraft II install, if any). I just installed the new (beta) version and I'm looking to try out StarJeweled (since I'm an admitted Bejeweled 3 addict).

And by the way, it *will* install on Windows 8 Release Preview.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!