I confess: I bought an iPad (and so far I love it)


Recommended Posts

Mary Jo Foley : I confess: I bought an iPad (and so far I love it)

I bought an iPad.

Big deal, you say? So did 3.3 million other people so far this year.

Well, for me it is a big deal. I?m a PC. I am not an early adopter or someone who rushes out to buy the latest/greatest gadget. This is the first Apple product I?ve ever owned.

So why did I succumb to the charms of the iPad? Quite simply, I have not been able to find a PC that offered what an iPad does. Windows laptops are powerful, versatile and relatively inexpensive compared to Apple?s counter-offerings. You can get portable netbooks (with so-so performance), great big-screen gaming rigs and thin-and-light models (like the Asus UL30A that is my current workhorse). But none of these has the amazing battery life, fast on/off, ultra-handy form factor, a made-for-touch interface (rather than touch bolted on to a keyboard/mouse-centric interface) or a built-in app store.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/i-confess-i-bought-an-ipad-and-so-far-i-love-it/6912

Edited by rm20010
Use the original title.

Same here, the only thing I hate is not able to play flash video.

One of the reasons that I will never buy an iPad, as well as connectivity and card reader.

I need something that is light, portable with the ability to plug in memory cards or my DSLR, so I've opted for a netbook...just awaiting its arrival.... :whistle:

I admit I didn't "get" it for a long time, though that did change somewhat. And then I held it in one hand while trying to play a game on my friend's ipad. 15 minutes of this is more of an arm workout than a week of masturbating, I swear. This thing is very heavy for it's size. Considering there's no built-on way to prop it up, this thing is useless without their case.

Of my 2 friends that have them, neither of them actually used their ipad more than a week :wacko:

the probem with the iPad as I see it is that there is no classic usecase for it yet, because, although the concept is everything but new, the iPad offers usability no other Slate or Tablet has offered yet. It's in no way a replacement but more supplementary to what you have anyways.

I experienced that my habits changed after making the purchase.

Sure thing, you really, really don't NEED one and if you don't have the money and would have to save your a** off just to get one... I wouldn't.

In my case, I had some spare money I got from a client because he screwed up and I got some compensation. However, I wanted the iPad, would've never bought it if I didn't have the money right here, I got the money, bought it, best purchase this year so far...

The problem is, that before you have really used it for a few hours, at home, at the coffee shop, in the subway and not at the Apple store, you won't know what you're missing.

I have never been a fan of netbooks because I hated the form factor. The iPad, for me at least, is perfectly suited for quick webbrowsing, taking it to work (I have a 45 minute subway ride to get there) and generally to take it, where my MB is overspecced, too heavy or just not appropriate.

But that's only my opinion, some would consider me fanboy, because I own more than one Apple product and are totally happy with them (I must add - the antenna problem is virtually non-existent in germany, since T-Mobile here is pretty strong) but yea...

I admit I didn't "get" it for a long time, though that did change somewhat. And then I held it in one hand while trying to play a game on my friend's ipad. 15 minutes of this is more of an arm workout than a week of masturbating, I swear. This thing is very heavy for it's size. Considering there's no built-on way to prop it up, this thing is useless without their case.

Of my 2 friends that have them, neither of them actually used their ipad more than a week :wacko:

I was quite surprised by how heavy it is until I paid closer attention to the ads and realised that I was holding it wrong. Apparently you're meant to rest it on your lap as you lie on your sofa ;)

The other big thing I've noticed when using one is that the software experience is really claustrophobic. This may be due to the lack of multitasking in the current implementation but I just didn't like the feeling that I was stuck with one application at a time. Of course, at the end of the day the iPad doesn't do anything useful that can't be achieved better on a PC or a phone so there's no real need for one.

It was flame bait. Did you really think they'd let it stay as it was?

It seems like it depends on the site it appears in. It was an original copied from Blorge.com :-) you can't blame them for flaming.

I think the original heading just tries to prove a point, while the new headline could have been written by an Apple fanboy (which I am not as I don't own any of Apple's products).

I was quite surprised by how heavy it is until I paid closer attention to the ads and realised that I was holding it wrong. Apparently you're meant to rest it on your lap as you lie on your sofa ;)

The other big thing I've noticed when using one is that the software experience is really claustrophobic. This may be due to the lack of multitasking in the current implementation but I just didn't like the feeling that I was stuck with one application at a time. Of course, at the end of the day the iPad doesn't do anything useful that can't be achieved better on a PC or a phone so there's no real need for one.

Hopefully they implement multitasking better than they did with the iphone. It's a really ridiculous system to use. Despite my thoughts about this device before it came out, I actually want there to be a GOOD second iteration of the ipad. If they can add the missing features they should have had and can make it lighter, it could be a winner. I just can't see buying this gen one though

One of the reasons that I will never buy an iPad, as well as connectivity and card reader.

I need something that is light, portable with the ability to plug in memory cards or my DSLR, so I've opted for a netbook...just awaiting its arrival.... :whistle:

iPad Camera Connection Kit

At first I hated the iPad. now, I am writing this from my one month old iPad which I love. This is the greatest device I ever owned. It is the perfect companion wherever I am. I use it on my couch, in bed, when at customers, when traveling.

It is much better than any netbook out there, it is fast, has great apps and surfing the Internet with it is a joy. I don't like flash, so I don't care. The websites I visit work great with the iPad, even with video. This is indeed a great device.

Does the iPad teach you to write like that?

I tried an Ipad and was incredibly impressed. But the device was far too limited to be anything more than a novelty for me. I believe android slates will slowly take over though and be extremely useful. Microsoft has a chance to get ahead in this market. Their touch pack for windows 7 is a start, they need a full proper touch interface and GOOD marketing.

It is much better than any netbook out there

Congrats, you win stupid quote of the month for that one.

I can tell you now, my Acer Ferrari One netbook although ?300+ is still half the price of an iPad, has more than TWICE the power, RAM and Storage.

I have true Multitasking

I have GPS

I have a webcam

I have a card reader

I have USB ports

I have HD output & true HD capability

I have a true 16:9 display

I can view flash (80% of the top 100 web sites use flash)

The iPad has none of that, but I agree the iPad has it's place and is handy for many people, but please don't try and tell us it's a netbook beater like Steve Jobs lies to you, it's a PR stunt, nothing more.

I seriously considered an iPad, but don't do "sofa surfing" which is really where the iPad would excel.

Otherwise, most netbooks (or smaller laptops) obviously are far better.

I've got no plans on getting a iPad at this moment. It is still missing

a lot of features and other little things thats holding me back from

getting one. Here is my list of issues ...

1. no adobe-flash support .... 60% of video on the Internet is still flash

2. no multitasking support in the OS ... I know it coming later this fall .

3. no camera, micro SD, usb ports ... all these are a most before I get a iPad ..

4. support for other web browsers ... Firefox, Opera, Seamonkey ... even IE8 :whistle:

5. The price is too high for what you are getting .. it should be $150 less ... An don't say .. they spent tons on R&D ... thats total BS ..

That's basically covers ... why I've got no plans on getting one ....

Maybe I'll get one when they release a 7" or 8" version of the iPad ... if they don't add

a camera, micro SD, I'll pass on this too ... if they do all the above and forge the usb

I might get it. Also, Apple needs to support Adobe-Flash ... a must in my book ..

Thats my 2 cents on the subject ...

Congrats, you win stupid quote of the month for that one.

SNIP

The iPad has none of that, but I agree the iPad has it's place and is handy for many people, but please don't try and tell us it's a netbook beater like Steve Jobs lies to you, it's a PR stunt, nothing more.

I seriously considered an iPad, but don't do "sofa surfing" which is really where the iPad would excel.

Otherwise, most netbooks (or smaller laptops) obviously are far better.

That's his opinion that it is better then a netbook, i think mine is also. You do understand what an opinion is right.

And I use my iPad more then sofa searching, and use it for day to day stuff and haven't booted my laptop sonic i got it, i can do word docs fine, and all of my email accounts, even my web based work account, remote sessions with a desktop, and pretty much the only thing that i have to use either my laptop or desktop is games, and ripping my DVD's for streaming over the network to my 360, iPad, whatever.

And i STILL have yet to run into those TOP 100 websites that depend on flash on either desktop or iPad so yea that flash is a killer

If he thinks his iPad is better then a notebook, that's his belief, if you think it's not, that's yours. Stupid quote of the month crap you need to get over yourself.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!