I confess: I bought an iPad (and so far I love it)


Recommended Posts

1. no adobe-flash support .... 60% of video on the Internet is still flash

2. no multitasking support in the OS ... I know it coming later this fall .

3. no camera, micro SD, usb ports ... all these are a most before I get a iPad ..

4. support for other web browsers ... Firefox, Opera, Seamonkey ... even IE8 :whistle:

5. The price is too high for what you are getting .. it should be $150 less ... An don't say .. they spent tons on R&D ... thats total BS ..

1. Haven't noticed that one

2. True comming later but even then not true multitasking sonly supports up to 4 apps

3. MicoSD and USB can somewhat be taken care of off the record with the camera kit, but true it would be better with those if one needs it, camera I'm soso on

4. There're are ALOT of different web browsers that can be run on it, including FireFox and Opera, they are currently in the app store, but for iPhone/iPod touch which runs on the iPad, but not native display which i wish they would, all the others do

5. Agreed that the price should be lower

4. There're are ALOT of different web browsers that can be run on it, including FireFox and Opera, they are currently in the app store, but for iPhone/iPod touch which runs on the iPad, but not native display which i wish they would, all the others do

Opera Mini is only useful on 3G, otherwise it's slower (and anyway has page rendering issues).

Firefox is not on the app store at all. You're thinking of Firefox Home which is not a web browser.

If you do a search on the app store for web browser, all the results are basically Safari with no option to view history, or Safari with full screen, and aren't different web browsers at all (because they all use Safari APIs).

Mary Jo Foley : I confess: I bought an iPad (and so far I love it)

So why did I succumb to the charms of the iPad? Quite simply, I have not been able to find a PC that offered what an iPad does. Windows laptops are powerful, versatile and relatively inexpensive compared to Apple?s counter-offerings. You can get portable netbooks (with so-so performance), great big-screen gaming rigs and thin-and-light models (like the Asus UL30A that is my current workhorse). But none of these has the amazing battery life, fast on/off, ultra-handy form factor, a made-for-touch interface (rather than touch bolted on to a keyboard/mouse-centric interface) or a built-in app store.

this is my answer

Opera Mini is only useful on 3G, otherwise it's slower (and anyway has page rendering issues).

Firefox is not on the app store at all. You're thinking of Firefox Home which is not a web browser.

If you do a search on the app store for web browser, all the results are basically Safari with no option to view history, or Safari with full screen, and aren't different web browsers at all (because they all use Safari APIs).

Yea it's firefox home, but i was under the understanding that it was about the same but with sync ability, so the app wont open web pages?

I used Opera on my iPod touch and it did seem faster, but because it's using their servers for pages (like a passthrough or proxy server) that's where the speed comes from.

As far as all safari API, a webkit browser is a webkit browser in my opinion, i thought they were all different though.

this is my answer

Ill pass, the windows 7 part is using the hardware in the keyboard and just operating in a remote session, getting that cause he said it was using 7 on an intel processor, yet the tablet runs snapdragon.

And it seemed kind of slow when he was using it in tablet form, but hopefully cause it's using Linux, it can be changed to something the tablet can handle as from what he was doing with it, it seemed underpowered, and slow.

I still have high hopes for the slate in a consumer form, not enterprise that it was changed to.

Congrats, you win stupid quote of the month for that one.

I can tell you now, my Acer Ferrari One netbook although ?300+ is still half the price of an iPad, has more than TWICE the power, RAM and Storage.

I have true Multitasking

I have GPS

I have a webcam

I have a card reader

I have USB ports

I have HD output & true HD capability

I have a true 16:9 display

I can view flash (80% of the top 100 web sites use flash)

The iPad has none of that, but I agree the iPad has it's place and is handy for many people, but please don't try and tell us it's a netbook beater like Steve Jobs lies to you, it's a PR stunt, nothing more.

I seriously considered an iPad, but don't do "sofa surfing" which is really where the iPad would excel.

Otherwise, most netbooks (or smaller laptops) obviously are far better.

The thing is most people use a netbook for surfing the net, checking email, browsing youtube and going on social websites - all those other features you've mentioned the majority of people don't need for what they would use a netbook for. They don't need twice the power of an iPad to do this. The iPad is better at browsing the net than a netbook with the exception of flash (I used to have a netbook about 2 years ago, sold it after about 2 months and I now have an iPad and I wont be selling it). So the iPad is a netbook killer in the sense that it is better at doing the things most people use a netbook for. It's not a netbook killer in pure hardware and features.

It's like saying a smartphone is a laptop killer. They are both for mobile computing, but they target different needs and use scenarios. Because a netbook has so many features it has several use scenarios from full on coding and designing to simply browsing the net. Your netbook use scenario is the extreme and the iPad isn't better but for the majority of "sofa surfers" it is.

The iPad has GPS by the way, but again most people aren't going to be using this.

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't have a hard-on for iPads myself but it is pretty standard that the only people who knock Apple products are the people who haven't seriously tried using them. I used PCs, sold PCs, fixed PCs and talked about PCs on TV and radio for nearly a decade. Then I got a job at a company that used Macs. Needless to say, I have a MacBook Pro now and laugh any time somebody tells me PCs can do anything Macs can.

I don't like flash, so I don't care.

LOL.. responses like is what really gets me laughing.. How do you "not like Flash".. Technology that brought us ubiquity on the interent, unified videos and brought us free stuff.. It seems people forgot what web looked like prior to Flash?

The only reason a person can say a thing like "I don't like Flash" or "It needs to die", is the one who believes stupid Steve Jobs crap. But again, not really surprised people do.

When you shell out $500-$800 and you can't see 70% of the internet you start making justifications and believe stupid sh**.

But no worries, those will soon be over just like the thing with iPhone was.. Real Slate computers are coming.. with support for Android, TV, Flash, camera etc etc.. and they will be cheaper, have better performance and be actually open so I can put whatever I want on it and not just stuff Apple tells me I can.

Rubbish. An iPad is nothing like a netbook.

How so? The intent of a netbook is that it is a small, portable device to be used for e-mail, web browsing, and other network tasks. How does that NOT describe the iPad as well?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook

I'd like to think what would've happened if Apple introduced a simpler and less powerful version of Mac OSX for the iPad instead of using iOS.

I honestly don't think it would have worked as well.

I still stand by the opinion that a desktop OS is not entirely appropriate for a Tablet or Slate type touchscreen device. The best user experience is surely acheived from an operating system designed around touch input, and not the other way around (adapting the operating system for touch input) as has been done with Windows 7 (although I don't doubt that people run Windows 7 quite happily on tablets - before I get jumped on! :p )

Already liking the look of the newest lot of tablet/netbook OS's; Google Chrome OS, Jolicloud, Meego etc.

I just hope iOS builds on a lot of the weaknesses and lacking features that presently exist in iOS of the iPad - Only then might I consider purchasing one to compliment my iPhone!

LOL.. responses like is what really gets me laughing.. How do you "not like Flash".. Technology that brought us ubiquity on the interent, unified videos and brought us free stuff.. It seems people forgot what web looked like prior to Flash?

The only reason a person can say a thing like "I don't like Flash" or "It needs to die", is the one who believes stupid Steve Jobs crap. But again, not really surprised people do.

When you shell out $500-$800 and you can't see 70% of the internet you start making justifications and believe stupid sh**.

But no worries, those will soon be over just like the thing with iPhone was.. Real Slate computers are coming.. with support for Android, TV, Flash, camera etc etc.. and they will be cheaper, have better performance and be actually open so I can put whatever I want on it and not just stuff Apple tells me I can.

You can laugh as much as you want to. The sites I visit work great on my ipad and Flash as a technology was always bad. It is slow, written for input devices like a mouse (and not for Touch interfaces), and is the source of 99% of all annoying ads on the Internet. I don't like saying it as I am no Apple fanboy, but Steve Jobs is right this time.

The slates you mention wont do the trick also, because they are not optimized for touch interfaces. Google doesn't even officially support Android on tablets (yet). Microsoft on the other hand is insisting on telling us that Windows 7 is the OS for tablets...

How so? The intent of a netbook is that it is a small, portable device to be used for e-mail, web browsing, and other network tasks. How does that NOT describe the iPad as well?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook

The ipad is a tablet device, not a netbook. They might share some functionality (as all computer devices do), but the form factor is different.

It is slow, written for input devices like a mouse (and not for Touch interfaces), and is the source of 99% of all annoying ads on the Internet.

LOL.. god why do I even argue when people have no clue.

No technology out there is written for "touch interfaces". HTML5 is not native touch, no other technology is.. actually Flash is the CLOSEST thing to supporting touch without changing a lot of code. You can run code and they react to touch as if it was mouse. So please don't discuss something that you have no idea about.

Second, 99% of all annoying ads are served through flash because it gives analytics and can run optimized videos and stuff through them. Do you think that you won't get ads with HTML5? LOL.. you are just so naive..

Apple will serve you ads wherever they can.. The whole point is that they don't want Flash because they want to monetize those same ads. Not because Flash is annoying.. and btw, you won't be able to block HTML5 ads like you can Flash. If you think that getting rid of Flash will get rid of ads, you are delusional.

So much for that..

I wish people wouldn't just blindly repeat stupid sh*t from Apple as if it was some noble thing when in fact the lying sacks of crap just want the same thing but to work for them.

Wake up.

The slates you mention wont do the trick also, because they are not optimized for touch interfaces.

What the hell are you even talking about.

LOL.. god why do I even argue when people have no clue.

No technology out there is written for "touch interfaces". HTML5 is not native touch, no other technology is.. actually Flash is the CLOSEST thing to supporting touch without changing a lot of code. You can run code and they react to touch as if it was mouse. So please don't discuss something that you have no idea about.

Second, 99% of all annoying ads are served through flash because it gives analytics and can run optimized videos and stuff through them. Do you think that you won't get ads with HTML5? LOL.. you are just so naive..

Apple will serve you ads wherever they can.. The whole point is that they don't want Flash because they want to monetize those same ads. Not because Flash is annoying.. and btw, you won't be able to block HTML5 ads like you can Flash. If you think that getting rid of Flash will get rid of ads, you are delusional.

So much for that..

I wish people wouldn't just blindly repeat stupid sh*t from Apple as if it was some noble thing when in fact the lying sacks of crap just want the same thing but to work for them.

Wake up.

I'm not a fan of Flash either, and also think it's pointless on a mobile device. Lets go over a few things here... First, he never mentioned he'd rather HTML5 as an alternative. He simply said that Flash is annoying and not very useful on mobile devices. You're entire response is about how HTML5 is no better than flash, and yet, no one mentioned HTML5. Let's get back to the issue with Flash on a mobile device instead. First off, Flash IS slow. Windows is the only thing Flash runs halfway decent on, and even then it's not that great. The large majority of Flash IS written for input devices like a mouse, Petvas's point. Not that HTML5 would be better, but that Flash isn't very useful because so much of the Flash out there can't be properly used on a touch screen, unless it's just a movie player. Also, Flash IS the source of MANY ads, meaning, it has limited usefulness in other aspects, but what it can offer is a lot more ads. Without it, less ads, and not much missed out on.

Furthermore, Flash has ALWAYS been VERY buggy. If my web browser ever crashes, you can almost be guaranteed it's because of Flash. So here's my opinion. Most applications of Flash on the web are useless on a phone, except for movie players. I'm not a fan of Flash as a movie player, because I don't see why you wouldn't use something native like HTML5 that doesn't require a third party plugin. The video tag is interpreted by your browser as a block of space to send native H264 (or other) media to your browser, and have your browser play it. Why add Flash in the middle when it's not needed?

So, going back to the HTML5 vs Flash thing, yes, you can code all the Flash on the web to work better with Flash, but you can also do all the same natively with HTML5, which every browser supports now. I understand that Flash is capable, I don't understand what the point in a "middle-man" plugin when the same things can be done natively now. Yes, I'm sure Flash still has it's applications alongside HTML5, but again, the web as it is today, which is all that matters, makes Flash somewhat pointless on your phone. Regardless of what it can do or is capable of, it's, for the most part, not used for that right now. And btw, you CAN block HTML5 in exactly the same way you block Flash, by blocking a specific tag or it's parent container.

Now, while I don't think Flash is anywhere near as useful as it used to be, I don't pick sides and have tech wars over a certain technology, I think that's silly. So in Flash's defense, while it is less useful on a mobile phone, something like the iPad probably should have it. Just like I said earlier, the web as it is today is what really matters, and a lot of sites still use Flash in ways that make a device that's main point is as a web tablet need it at times. There are a lot of sites with video players that use Flash, and regardless of if Flash is or isn't the best solution for something like that, not having it means you miss out on most video sites on the web today. So I understand the reasoning for wanting Flash, especially on more of a tablet type device that you're going to use to browse the web a lot, but I entirely agree that Flash needs to start being phased out for a lot of it's applications that it's simply not necessary anymore for when there's native ways of doing the same thing.

How so? The intent of a netbook is that it is a small, portable device to be used for e-mail, web browsing, and other network tasks. How does that NOT describe the iPad as well?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netbook

I don't know who you see using a netbook, but people use it for a lot more than the tasks a crippled iPad can handle.

If it's just for email and web browsing, I'll take my Galaxy S phone anyday rather than lay out £600 for an inferior version of a Macbook.

Whenever I do some late night browsing, I use my iPad for the portability. I also play games on it as well as chat. For personal use, it's pretty much a toy, and you can do everything it does with a standard computer. But the size and battery life definitely add a level of convienience that is hard to get at the same time in other devices.

When I am at work, I use it for discrete tasks like assisting me in focusing cameras (think of having a mini monitor with you wherever you go) and remoting into different machines around the world, without staying tied down to a desk.

I can certainly say that it fits my needs and that I use it every single day. Am I telling anyone else to get one? No, it's not for everyone. Conversely, it's foolish to say that no one out there has a need for one and that those that buy them are simply throwing money away.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!