I confess: I bought an iPad (and so far I love it)


Recommended Posts

That's an over simplification. Applications need to be built with the bigger screen in mind. Otherwise you might as well just use the phone. It makes a huge difference in day to day use. I do not use one single iPhone sized app on the iPad. All the apps on my iPad were purpose built for it.

What is going to be interesting is how developers manage to cater for all the different screen sizes that are likely to come out for the Android tablets - from 5 inches (Dell is calling the Streak a tablet) all the way to 12 or more inches. That's not a trivial undertaking. Screen sizes may differ, but the finger stays the same size. Mouse, and stylus driven interfaces can get away with shrinking the buttons. Not touch interfaces.

Absolutely agree. And applications will be developed for it just like they did for the iPad. The only difference is, you have true multitasking on your wireless device. That for me will make it a true netbook replacement. Let's face it, Microsoft can't run the same OS for desktops on netbooks. It's absolutely horrible for them to even do that. It's not a smooth experience at all.

And NIN application is absolutely awful..

What makes it "Absolutely" awful?

1) An iPad is an oversized iPhone. Just like the Android Tablet will be an oversized Android Phone.

2) I never said Log me In wasn't available on the iPhone / iPad.

Knowing number 1, which is a big 1 for me, I prefer multi-tasking over what Apple passes off. And from what I understand, the iPad doesn't have iOS 4 on it which means no multi-tasking. Let's face it, the Android Tablet will not be different than an Android Phone other than no phone capabilities and a bigger screen. Plus you'll have more options by January/February 2011. Sorry if Android Phones are out performing the iPhone. It must hurt Apple fanboys like yourself. It puts a smile on my face.

Sorry everyone. I have low a tolerance for stupidity.

You must hate yourself then, if you can read I never said one was better then the other, unlike you have so please stop being a fanboy.

All the basic apps that exist for the iPhone exist for the Android. What iPhone has more of is games. It would be nice if Android got some game love but honestly, I don't play video games so I doesn't affect me. The only app for me that the iPhone has that I want for my Android is the NIN app. Other than that, there is no difference.

You call people idiots but you havnt got a clue what you are talking about, compare the stores the iphone has a lot more and it isn't just games, we have quality professional apps like WHM, Pingdom, BBC, WHMCS, you talking out of your arse when you say they are the same, Android apps have a long way to go.

You call people idiots but you havnt got a clue what you are talking about, compare the stores the iphone has a lot more and it isn't just games, we have quality professional apps like WHM, Pingdom, BBC, WHMCS, you talking out of your arse when you say they are the same, Android apps have a long way to go.

Sorry I hurt your feelings. But I did say BASIC apps. Maybe the iPhone needs a "Hooked on Phonics" app? Relax buddy, in the end, it's just a phone. Don't get to worked up, you'll live longer.

Absolutely agree. And applications will be developed for it just like they did for the iPad. The only difference is, you have true multitasking on your wireless device. That for me will make it a true netbook replacement. Let's face it, Microsoft can't run the same OS for desktops on netbooks. It's absolutely horrible for them to even do that. It's not a smooth experience at all.

windows 7 starter is just fine on my netbook. it's snappier than some laptops i've used and it suits the needs and wants i bought it for perfectly.

that being said i have no interest in tablet devices at all.

windows 7 starter is just fine on my netbook. it's snappier than some laptops i've used and it suits the needs and wants i bought it for perfectly.

that being said i have no interest in tablet devices at all.

Windows 7 Starter is horrible. You can't have too many apps running at once because of the limit Microsoft put in. Microsoft really needs to be innovative and write an OS specifically for mobile devices. That is where Apple got it right.

PS Your signature makes me laugh. I have something similar for my email signature from my phone.

Windows 7 Starter is horrible. You can't have too many apps running at once because of the limit Microsoft put in. Microsoft really needs to be innovative and right an OS specifically for mobile devices. That is where Apple got it right.

Holy missing the point, Batman.

Holy missing the point, Batman.

I got the point Robin. It suits his needs. My opinion is it is horrible because it doesn't suit my needs.

Read Between

Jesus Christ, does everything have to be spelled out on this forum so people can understand?

The Lines

You call people idiots but you havnt got a clue what you are talking about, compare the stores the iphone has a lot more and it isn't just games, we have quality professional apps like WHM, Pingdom, BBC, WHMCS, you talking out of your arse when you say they are the same, Android apps have a long way to go.

I think you are dismissing one very important fact.. most of the "apps" you have on the iphone need to be apps because their websites are not supported on iPhone's Safari..

Why do I need for example a BBC player or whatever application when I can go to the Flash site with my Android phone and just enjoy the full experience there.

I mean, i think you are forgetting the fact that some apps on iPhone are there because of Apple's refusal to accept Flash and other technologies from getting on iPhone due to their own interests. The fact alone I can play games and run websites with Flash on my Nexus One makes all those apps on App Store obsolete to me despite the fact that some sites and games online are still not "optimized" in Flash for that.. but that will come too as Flash now supports proper optimizations and touch APIs and all that good stuff right in the player.

Just some food for thought.

I think you are dismissing one very important fact.. most of the "apps" you have on the iphone need to be apps because their websites are not supported on iPhone's Safari..

Why do I need for example a BBC player or whatever application when I can go to the Flash site with my Android phone and just enjoy the full experience there.

I mean, i think you are forgetting the fact that some apps on iPhone are there because of Apple's refusal to accept Flash and other technologies from getting on iPhone due to their own interests. The fact alone I can play games and run websites with Flash on my Nexus One makes all those apps on App Store obsolete to me despite the fact that some sites and games online are still not "optimized" in Flash for that.. but that will come too as Flash now supports proper optimizations and touch APIs and all that good stuff right in the player.

Just some food for thought.

Unfortunatly the BBC iPlayer isn't a iPhone app, it works in safari. As to the reset, none of those apps I mentioned use Flash on the website, sorry Boz, big fail.

Windows 7 Starter is horrible. You can't have too many apps running at once because of the limit Microsoft put in. Microsoft really needs to be innovative and write an OS specifically for mobile devices. That is where Apple got it right.

PS Your signature makes me laugh. I have something similar for my email signature from my phone.

that limit does not exist in win 7 starter.

basically the difference between starter and home basic is you can't change the wallpaper. big deal especially since your browser fills the whole screen.

Is that why it dominates the market and is accepted by the majority?

No, it dominates the market because it was the first and ended up being bundled with OSX and Windows (and Linux too). It's not because it dominates the market that it's the best :rolleyes:

Unfortunatly the BBC iPlayer isn't a iPhone app, it works in safari. As to the reset, none of those apps I mentioned use Flash on the website, sorry Boz, big fail.

I'm not talking about apps you mentioned but in general.. you need to have things like Hulu app to watch Hulu and similar apps and games in general that you can run in browser with FLash on iPhone and you count those as apps (btw you can run Hulu on Android if you go through proxy that hides mobile signature).. I don't count those as apps because I can access them through browser on my Android phone so there is really no need for the owners of those sites to even have those apps on Android plus in some cases you will be getting less content through your iPhone app or you will have to pay for it (not all but it happens because of the invested resources in building a separate application for the same content for the iphone). Android with Flash on the web gets the full experience as it was meant to be and most of the time it's free..

And that's exactly one of the reasons why Apple banned Flash from their platform.

I am still very skeptical on buying an iPad, I think once they add multitasking that would be the thing to have me sold. I really need opinions of people other than it's a toy. Why do you love your iPad? what makes it loveable? How is it say you're sitting in bed browsing sites and you receive an IM/ tweet/ IRC? is switching as simple as a computer? I am but moment from clicking the buy button on the apple website.. So help me out here.

I am still very skeptical on buying an iPad, I think once they add multitasking that would be the thing to have me sold. I really need opinions of people other than it's a toy. Why do you love your iPad? what makes it loveable? How is it say you're sitting in bed browsing sites and you receive an IM/ tweet/ IRC? is switching as simple as a computer? I am but moment from clicking the buy button on the apple website.. So help me out here.

Video is probably the killer app for me at the moment. Streaming movies or shows from my Mac to the iPad whilst in bed is pretty convenient. Yes, I know I can do that with a netbook or a MacBook, but there's just something charming and handy about the iPad. It's always there and it's always on (seriously, the battery life is unreal).

Video is probably the killer app for me at the moment. Streaming movies or shows from my Mac to the iPad whilst in bed is pretty convenient. Yes, I know I can do that with a netbook or a MacBook, but there's just something charming and handy about the iPad. It's always there and it's always on (seriously, the battery life is unreal).

What about streaming music from the mac/ Pc to the iPad? how would you do that? also if you pause a movie went back to the home screen sent a few messages/ browsed the web then went back to the movie streaming app, would it play where you left off?

that limit does not exist in win 7 starter.

basically the difference between starter and home basic is you can't change the wallpaper. big deal especially since your browser fills the whole screen.

You're absolutely right. I forgot Microsoft later changed that policy. But still it is not the best OS for a netbook. It should be something like where Chrome OS is going (where everything is run from the cloud).

What about streaming music from the mac/ Pc to the iPad? how would you do that? also if you pause a movie went back to the home screen sent a few messages/ browsed the web then went back to the movie streaming app, would it play where you left off?

Never tried streaming any music as I already have an alternative solution. If you can find a way of doing it, I'm willing to try it out for you.

I'm using AirVideo for iPhone and iPad, which will transcode pretty much any video format on the fly (including 1080p .mkv files, if your network can handle it). Whenever I want to check my mail or Twitter, the transcoding stops but AirVideo seems to remember my position (don't ask me how, I'd have assumed this is something that would have required 4.0 multitasking). Once I'm good to go, I simply hit play and the transcoding then picks up where it left off. Pretty seamless if you ask me.

Personally, I'd wait it out for the inevitable 2nd generation iPad in 2011. FaceTime, Retina display and more memory will really make the iPad a killer device. The 4.0 update due sometime before the end of the year will hopefully add some much needed improvements.

No, it dominates the market because it was the first and ended up being bundled with OSX and Windows (and Linux too). It's not because it dominates the market that it's the best :rolleyes:

Rubbish. The Nintendo Wii came out a year after the 360 but still dominates it (and the PS3).

Things dominate because people use them. People use them because they think the product is better than it's alternatives (if alternatives exist at all).

I think you are dismissing one very important fact.. most of the "apps" you have on the iphone need to be apps because their websites are not supported on iPhone's Safari..

Why do I need for example a BBC player or whatever application when I can go to the Flash site with my Android phone and just enjoy the full experience there.

I mean, i think you are forgetting the fact that some apps on iPhone are there because of Apple's refusal to accept Flash and other technologies from getting on iPhone due to their own interests. The fact alone I can play games and run websites with Flash on my Nexus One makes all those apps on App Store obsolete to me despite the fact that some sites and games online are still not "optimized" in Flash for that.. but that will come too as Flash now supports proper optimizations and touch APIs and all that good stuff right in the player.

Just some food for thought.

As a developer, I violently disagree with Apple's stance on what's allowed on the devices, and how they go about it. I need to pay $99/year just to be able to run software that I wrote, on a device that I own? Really? On that point I agree with you 100%.

However, I don't agree that most of the iPhone apps are there because of the lack of Flash. The apps are there because people prefer to use a native app than going to a website. A phone isn't like a traditional computer. People may use an app for a few seconds, then move on to something else. I could fire up the browser on my phone, look up a bookmark, wait for the page to load, navigate to the section I want, and do whatever I wanted to do. Or I could fire up an app and get straight to the point, using a UI that's been designed to work well on the phone. That's the reason why so many apps exist. If BBC has a native app, and ABC doesn't, I use the BBC. ABC figure this out, and they make an app too. These sites realise that in order to be competitive they need to build native applications for the platform. I win.

As a user, I take a native application over a Flash application any day. Same goes for an Adobe Air app. Native is better integrated. Chances are the UI won't suck and that the platform conventions are respected. That the Cancel and OK buttons will be in the right places. I care about this on my computer. I care about this even more on my phone, where I am less inclined to put up with clunky UI. I want optimised. I don't want one size fits all.

As a developer, I subscribe to the "best tool for the job" mentality. Flash is hardly the best tool for building mobile apps on iOS or Android. Developers should also open their eyes, put down the hammer, and stop looking at everything like they are nails. Objectively, for the platform's users, native is best. Users have voted, and content providers are taking notice.

I think you are dismissing one very important fact.. most of the "apps" you have on the iphone need to be apps because their websites are not supported on iPhone's Safari..

Why do I need for example a BBC player or whatever application when I can go to the Flash site with my Android phone and just enjoy the full experience there.

I mean, i think you are forgetting the fact that some apps on iPhone are there because of Apple's refusal to accept Flash and other technologies from getting on iPhone due to their own interests. The fact alone I can play games and run websites with Flash on my Nexus One makes all those apps on App Store obsolete to me despite the fact that some sites and games online are still not "optimized" in Flash for that.. but that will come too as Flash now supports proper optimizations and touch APIs and all that good stuff right in the player.

Just some food for thought.

After watching the Droid 2 + Flash video on Adobe's website, I can safely say that I prefer that developers are making native applications. It's possible that those Flash apps haven't been "optimized" yet, but they were quite slow and unresponsive in the video (especially when the video players had to bring up controls or overlays). That's not something that a native app is immune too, but it's certainly not the norm.

As a user, I take a native application over a Flash application any day. Same goes for an Adobe Air app. Native is better integrated. Chances are the UI won't suck and that the platform conventions are respected. That the Cancel and OK buttons will be in the right places. I care about this on my computer. I care about this even more on my phone, where I am less inclined to put up with clunky UI. I want optimised. I don't want one size fits all.

As a developer, I subscribe to the "best tool for the job" mentality. Flash is hardly the best tool for building mobile apps on iOS or Android. Developers should also open their eyes, put down the hammer, and stop looking at everything like they are nails. Objectively, for the platform's users, native is best. Users have voted, and content providers are taking notice.

This.

Developing isn't easy. I know. But the "one size fits all" usually doesn't work for apps. For games, sure, but for apps, users like a native UI and a consistent UX. Chances are if you're developing for one UX, you're breaking another and vice-versa.

I think you are dismissing one very important fact.. most of the "apps" you have on the iphone need to be apps because their websites are not supported on iPhone's Safari..

Most apps are apps because you can sell them in the App Store. You can't sell a flash website anyone can visit using Safari.

I love how everyone is still saying they Love their iPads yet not giving us a reason what I'd really like to know what you love about the device & how much use of it does it get?

I really would love to know how you sit and use the device; Do you sit legs crossed, on a bed? on a couch? in the bath?.. I have looked at the iPad ads and to be quite honest it looks like they have the device in their laps and are looking at it by bending forward.. Now wouldn't that be really really bad for the neck? So again I ask How do you sit using your iPad? and what do you find most comfy?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!