Linkin Park: "A Thousand Suns" (Album) Discussion


Recommended Posts

They're interludes, not songs.

I mean, yeah, technically they are. Personally, I see it is ambient noise that serves almost no purpose. I've listened to a lot of aural music though, so I am a bit aggressive on things like this. The over usage of them is what bothers me, as you begin to see how little of actual music is on the album.

I did like a few of the actual songs from it, but I honestly did not understand the overall concept.

To each his own (Y) I honestly didn't expect most people who only liked their heavier work to like it, as it definitely isn't heavy. It's getting pretty great professional reviews so far, but there have been two very vocal negative reviews.

@ Unrealistic: It's a political album, if you listen to the lyrics. Not like, "Obama rulez!" (or the inverse), but more general in a commentary on human nature and society, I suppose you could say (Mario Savio and his "Gears" free speech... speech, Martin Luther King Jr. and civil rights/equality, Oppenheimer and his comments on creating the atomic bomb). It's meant to be listened to all the way through, hence the interludes. There's lots of references to previous acts that have influenced the band, especially Public Enemy.

one of the most piece of crap I had heard this year. Pretty bad and most of the time annoying. Seems like the old linkin park is already dead and they are since minutes to midnight. The only thing that keeps them alive is transformers, that damn movie, nothing more.

Professional Reviews Thus Far

Professional Reviews don't mean **** if the users don't like it.

Just look at the sputnik site. They gave it a 3.5, users average is 2.6, with 18 votes at 2 and 12 at 1. You can have every professional in the world say something is great or bad and it doesn't mean a thing. Remember what critics said about John Hughes flicks in the 80's?

Wow, what a steaming piles of crap! They lost me as a fan with this festering mess of a cd, they can't "come for me" soon enough...

I realize they will NEVER make another Hybrid Theory, but they should NOT STOP TRYING!! :no:

I'm just glad my cousin is a total diehard fan and will buy this from me, even if it is for half price. :crazy:

Professional Reviews don't mean **** if the users don't like it.

Just look at the sputnik site. They gave it a 3.5, users average is 2.6, with 18 votes at 2 and 12 at 1. You can have every professional in the world say something is great or bad and it doesn't mean a thing. Remember what critics said about John Hughes flicks in the 80's?

My God dude, you need to calm down. I never diminished your opinion, I was simply trying to contribute to the thread. Chill out. I get you don't like the album. That is a perfectly valid opinion to have. I was not in any way negating your opinion by posting professional reviews. There are plenty of fans out there that love the album, too, as well as plenty that hate it. If you go to their official forums, or fansites, the reaction is overwhelmingly positive. Does that make their reaction "right"? NO. Do the reactions from people on other music sites mean they're automatically "right"? NO.

I could just as easily point to the comments on some of those articles as indicators that the reaction is positive, but it doesn't matter. This is only a discussion of the album, and I'm doing my best to include everything I can, both positive and negative. At the end of the day, if you don't like the album, that should be good enough for you. Why you need others to verify that it is "crap" is beyond me, just as why anyone needs good reviews to verify that their liking an album is "good" makes no sense. If they like it and no one else does, who the hell cares?

As far as John Hughes, I have no clue what you're talking about. Almost all of his well-reviewed movies, including The Breakfast Club and Ferris Bueller's Day Off, were well-received from the beginning. They were also box office successes. So, again, not sure what you're harping on about. People's opinions are always going to differ, if that's your point. That's life.

In summary: RELAX. I'm continuing the thread. If you don't like it and can't discuss it like an adult, then don't even bother responding.

Lol at all the people here who judge Linkin Park based on Transformers. There used to be a time when we made an opinion on something after we tried it ourselves, rather than being weak and pathetic and using movies as excuses. Days when Microsoft's reputation didn't matter to the people, the quality of the operating system did, days where a video game was a video game was a video game, and it didn't matter what system it was on as long as it was good.

So to all you people judging this band based on what movies used their songs, grow a f***ing pair already.

I listened to the album after tiring of Linkin Park and I am happy to say I was pleased with this new direction they are taking. It's less angsty and more abstract.

Lol at all the people here who judge Linkin Park based on Transformers. There used to be a time when we made an opinion on something after we tried it ourselves, rather than being weak and pathetic and using movies as excuses. Days when Microsoft's reputation didn't matter to the people, the quality of the operating system did, days where a video game was a video game was a video game, and it didn't matter what system it was on as long as it was good.

So to all you people judging this band based on what movies used their songs, grow a f***ing pair already.

I listened to the album after tiring of Linkin Park and I am happy to say I was pleased with this new direction they are taking. It's less angsty and more abstract.

I only care how it sounds in my ears with my headphones on with no distractions or videos or artwork or stories, because nothing else matters. You can see how I feel about it a few posts up. I will listen to it maybe twice more and see if it grows on me, but having 6 of 15 tracks be "interludes" or whatever they want to call them crushes my soul a little every time I think about it. Strip the "transitions and intros" and you've got an EP just over 40 minutes long. How many times will you listen to those 6 songs driving down the road? You going to jam out to them?

I know and understand bands have to try new things, Linkin Park was different and amazing when I heard "Crawling" and "One Step Closer", but this new stuff just makes me shake my head and wonder what they were thinking? I get it, it's a "concept album", but Queensryche's Operation:Mindcrime didn't need 6 interludes to get the point across.

I'm hoping just enough people will buy this cd so they don't get dropped, because the next change in direction just might be the next Hybrid Theory.

In summary: RELAX. I'm continuing the thread. If you don't like it and can't discuss it like an adult, then don't even bother responding.

Sarcasm meter off a bit? Wasn't trying to do anything other than bring some dry-humor (obviously I failed) to the topic.

As far as John Hughes, I have no clue what you're talking about. Almost all of his well-reviewed movies, including The Breakfast Club and Ferris Bueller's Day Off, were well-received from the beginning. They were also box office successes. So, again, not sure what you're harping on about. People's opinions are always going to differ, if that's your point. That's life.

Don't You Forget About Me - Documentary on John Hughes. Watch it and you'll understand what I was referring to.

I'm continuing the thread

All I was trying to do. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough in my attempt at some humor/sarcasm.

RELAX.

Good advice.

Sorry man, truly. Didn't think you would take it so personal or as a direct attack against you. Was just my way of showing that (with the John Hughes comment) that professional people don't matter as much as they people who listen to it and the only opinion I'll wanna hear from is fellow Neowin's.. Again sorry man.

I hope you can accept this:

polls_Handshake_0028_332184_answer_4_xlarge.jpeg

Psst: Relax man, just joshing ya. :)

I'm hoping just enough people will buy this cd so they don't get dropped, because the next change in direction just might be the next Hybrid Theory.

I'd welcome that. Just don't think this album at any shape matches up to what LP produced with Hybrid Theory and Meteora .

I dont know what happend to them. Seems like they are with their own (really bad) projects and now they reunite just to make some money. The album is crap by definition. I didnt hear something good from them since meteora.

And Professional (payed) Reviews means nothing. If something is bad, is bad, there is nothing a "professional" (mercenary) can do.

I never really listened to Minutes to Midnight much, I have a great appreciation for Meteora and Hybrid Theory. How does it compare to some of their legacy tracks? Will give it a listen :)

Doesn't sound anything like Meteora or Hybrid Theory. In those times, Linkin Park was a great band. But now they got sort of soft and emotional instead of that I-Dont-Give-A-****-Lets-Live-Life personality they were initially known for. I honestly do not like A Thousand Suns. It's worse than Minutes to Midnight. However, their unreleased underground CD (IDK why the **** they DIDN'T release it before), Across the Line, is pretty good. It's like a mesh of Minutes to Midnight and Meteora with the single, The Catalyst and Wretches and Kings.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!