Recommended Posts

PC Patch out:

Hey PC community.

We are listening and have been working on updates. We have deployed a few already below, with more to come. Stay tuned here.

11/10

gameservers.com has bumped sv_maxrate to 25000 across all servers to reduce lag

gameservers.com continues to improve official server distribution

11/11

Friends fix for join in progress and Friends tab in server browser.

Performance improvement for dual and quad core.

Improved connectivity with Black Ops Rcon tool.

Regards,

-JD

http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1578882

Patch did stop the major stuttering - but frame rates are still terrible for me. Annoying.

Haha, this was so stupid - Guy just had to change his weapons for the hell of it, making noise. This is why you need patience and need to stay quiet at all times people :p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufK4BlRuItk

Owned! :laugh: Do you use headphones?

I'm struggling to reach a K/D ratio of 2. I'm at 1.77 now (from 1.85) because of lag.

Anyway, add me if you have the X360 version. My gamertag is Anaron. (Y)

I need all PC users to respond to this post urgently

Is anyone else able to play SP on the PC? And if so what programs are you running in the background? Thanks.

I'm able to play SP fine.

I have (off the top of my head) running most of the time:

* Firefox

* AltBinz

* Foobar2000

* Windows Explorer

* TightVNC Server

* Steam

* Thunderbird

* Fraps

Edit: I haven't tried since the patch though, if that matters.

Just started playing and I am not getting more than 1-2 fps at 1024x768 low settings. WTF lol

My system:

Intel P4 3Ghz (lol i know its the worst cpu ever made)

XFX 9600GT 512mb

1.5gb RAM

Medal of Honor runs just fine at 1920x1080 at medium settings.

I need all PC users to respond to this post urgently

Is anyone else able to play SP on the PC? And if so what programs are you running in the background? Thanks.

i can play no problems. 1680x1050 everything maxed out as high as possible in the settings. runs butter smooth.

background i have logmein, microsoft security essentials, xfi stuff, daemon tools. maybe chrome will be open or winamp but that's about it. my windows box is usually pretty bare in terms of running programs.

I need all PC users to respond to this post urgently

Is anyone else able to play SP on the PC? And if so what programs are you running in the background? Thanks.

Not able to correctly. Any resolution and it lags every minute or two. Not patched and no cfg tweaks. Running a few apps in the BG (no CPU usage on them), but CPU usage on CoD is nearly 100%, most of the time.

I need all PC users to respond to this post urgently

Is anyone else able to play SP on the PC? And if so what programs are you running in the background? Thanks.

Working great here at 1680 x 1050 with everything maxed out, Air Video and NIS 2010 are running in the background.

I'm on the 4th level of campaign, on vet. Haven't really been impressed by anything nor has the difficulty been hard. People say the 3rd and 4th are one(s) of the toughest to play on Vet. 3rd was a breeze. 4th one however is ****ing me off. First part of the level, I didn't do ****. AI did it all, just sat back sniping fools. Get to the part where you have to push back the NVA (downhill). Infinite respawns and all of a sudden the said AI becomes garbage and can't kill a thing if there life depended on it. Using infinite respawns and setting AI to "dumb" is a cheap tactic to make a game hard. Hope there isn't much more parts like this, because that's just some BS.

I'm on the 4th level of campaign, on vet. Haven't really been impressed by anything nor has the difficulty been hard. People say the 3rd and 4th are one(s) of the toughest to play on Vet. 3rd was a breeze. 4th one however is ****ing me off. First part of the level, I didn't do ****. AI did it all, just sat back sniping fools. Get to the part where you have to push back the NVA (downhill). Infinite respawns and all of a sudden the said AI becomes garbage and can't kill a thing if there life depended on it. Using infinite respawns and setting AI to "dumb" is a cheap tactic to make a game hard. Hope there isn't much more parts like this, because that's just some BS.

Yup, that is where I got stuck on veteran. Its crap, and that is why the SP campaign fails hard. I find it even more amusing that I see NVA in the background who are running to the right take random pop-shots like they are some thug gangster in a hollywood movie, hit me with one bullet, and either kill me or almost kill me. And then they run off to the right off screen. I especially love seeing the enemey just point the gun around or over cover and not even look where they are firing and still hit me with deadly accuracy.

MP is a whole other bag of ****. Absolutely the worst spawns of any COD and without a doubt worse than Halo. Matchmaking for 360 is a ****ing joke right now too and drops parties 75% of the time leading to 30-45 minutes of the party regrouping and then searching for a match again. This is a blatant prime example why matchmaking is a terrible idea and needs to go away.

I do however see potential in the games MP if they can work on the spawns and fix matchmaking to make it quit dropping parties in a very timely manner. Then they can work on the smaller things. This game has potential, it just needs work.

I'm on the 4th level of campaign, on vet. Haven't really been impressed by anything nor has the difficulty been hard. People say the 3rd and 4th are one(s) of the toughest to play on Vet. 3rd was a breeze. 4th one however is ****ing me off. First part of the level, I didn't do ****. AI did it all, just sat back sniping fools. Get to the part where you have to push back the NVA (downhill). Infinite respawns and all of a sudden the said AI becomes garbage and can't kill a thing if there life depended on it. Using infinite respawns and setting AI to "dumb" is a cheap tactic to make a game hard. Hope there isn't much more parts like this, because that's just some BS.

I don't recall any other areas being as bad as that one part of the level, I got stuck there for ages with the infinite spawns as I wasn't pushing the barrels down, and at the time didn't know you could, so it took ages to get through on just normal, lol.

Though I know now for my Veteran run through, looks like it will be the same as MW2, just being careful and not rushing with only a few problem areas, unlike WaW, after doing that on veteran I'm never playing that game again. :p

I need all PC users to respond to this post urgently

Is anyone else able to play SP on the PC? And if so what programs are you running in the background? Thanks.

Runs for me, has crashed twice since launch on SP but that was both on release day on level 1 - not done it since. I usually have firefox, maybe iTunes in the background. Apart from Steam of course and possibly Xfire that's it. Though it's still not as smooth as I'd like it in some combat situation even with some settings like anti-aliasing low.

I don't recall any other areas being as bad as that one part of the level, I got stuck there for ages with the infinite spawns as I wasn't pushing the barrels down, and at the time didn't know you could, so it took ages to get through on just normal, lol.

Though I know now for my Veteran run through, looks like it will be the same as MW2, just being careful and not rushing with only a few problem areas, unlike WaW, after doing that on veteran I'm never playing that game again. :p

EXACT same thing here, had a friend over while playing that level and we both had so many go's at that bit without realising you had to kick barrels. Only difference is I did it on Hardened. Managed to get down to the marker at the bottom a few times, last about 3 seconds then die. Fluke saved me as I dived next to a barrel for cover one time and whats-his-face ran up and kicked it over. It dawned on me then :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!